Fat man who came back, is standing Options

[Peter Damian]

I like the cut of his jib - he is the same as Obesity, yes?

Greetings, neighbors and colleagues. I am the Fat Man Who Never Came Back. I have voiced my ongoing displeasure with the Committee's performance this year, complaining that the committee as a whole is ineffectual, indecisive, uncommunicative and largely unresponsive to the demands and needs of the community. Many colleagues who share this point of view, or who otherwise tire of the "types" of candidates being perennially regurgitated, have begged me to run for a spot on the Committee. I have avoided declaring my candidacy in the hope that several bold, fresh and plausible voices from outside the crowd of AN/I and RfARB regulars would step onto the stage. For the most part, they have not materialized; the names I see on the ballot (while sometimes indicative of decent editors and administrators, impressive in their encyclopedic accomplishments) do not inspire confidence that an overhaul of the way ArbCom functions is likely, or even possible. With seven open seats, this may be the only real opportunity to radically change the composition and disposition of the Committee over the next few years.

The committee needs an injection of independence, clear communication and common sense. I support a more welcoming environment for expert content contributors and strong writers as well as an end to internal cronyism, favoritism and needless behind-the-scenes machinations. Though the Committee does not dictate editorial policy, I would not refrain from using my position on the Committee to throw considerable weight behind reforms that would help bolster Wikipedia's prestige with the outside world: greater sensitivity toward BLPs; exploring the implementation of flagged revisions; and an easy and straightforward process for demoting poorly performing administrators. Let the Fat Man help regain your trust and confidence.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=253725496

This is exactly what is needed. Why did no one think of that before?

This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Mon 24th November 2008, 4:11pm

[One]

The statement sounds like the work of a serious candidacy.

I wish Jechochman's first question to him didn't make it seem like a joke.

This post has been edited by One: Mon 24th November 2008, 4:13pm

[Littleunknownadmin]

The statement sounds like the work of a serious candidacy.

I wish Jechochman's first question to him didn't make it seem like a joke.

I think Jechohman just killed his chances for ArbCom with that question. It didn't sound like a joke Fat Man's candidacy.

This post has been edited by Littleunknownadmin: Mon 24th November 2008, 4:40pm

[JoseClutch]

The statement sounds like the work of a serious candidacy.

I wish Jechochman's first question to him didn't make it seem like a joke.

I think Jechohman just killed his chances for ArbCom with that question. It didn't sound like a joke Fat Man's candidacy.

I am not trying to say he would be a bad choice, but his chance of election was already "rhymes with hero".

Of course, a resulting blowup might put a dent in Jehochman's "plausible but not certain" candidacy.

And voters are ever fickle.

[Littleunknownadmin]

The statement sounds like the work of a serious candidacy.

I wish Jechochman's first question to him didn't make it seem like a joke.

I think Jechohman just killed his chances for ArbCom with that question. It didn't sound like a joke Fat Man's candidacy.

I am not trying to say he would be a bad choice, but his chance of election was already "rhymes with hero".

Of course, a resulting blowup might put a dent in Jehochman's "plausible but not certain" candidacy.

And voters are ever fickle.

Yea candidates aren't supposed to be involved in other candidates elections, Secret/Jaranda also just killed his small chances by reverting a new user candidacy. Both users should withdraw before there is a shit fest.