FT2 and Paul Sinclair, FT2 is not the man in the photos Options

[Proabivouac]

Last night, I spoke by telephone at some length to Paul Sinclair of Sinclair Associates, the man pictured in this thread…
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20192&st=0

…and on Hivemind:
http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/hivemind.html#338

FT2 was certainly the "Paul Sinclair" of the failed Wikimedia UK, but this man is not FT2. Accordingly, I suggest tarpitting threads in which this innocent man is exposed and criticized in FT2's stead.

[Lar]

I find this all confusing as all get out.

Which isn't the end of the world because
a) If it confuses me, it no doubt confuses everyone else, which seems a good thing since you're all busily trying to out people.
b) It's amusing to see all these pseuds industriously trying to connect real life identities together,
and c) It doesn't matter, really, who FT2 is... Who cares? Not me.

For the record I condemn all of this as BS, harrassy, stalky, and missing the point. Not to mention WR at its worst. Not that anyone cares but there you go.

Carry on playing silly buggers.

[Somey]

For the record I condemn all of this as BS, harrassy, stalky, and missing the point.

I was under the impression that the point, such as it is, is that several people here don't believe FT2 (T-C-L-K-R-D) 's assertions that his editing activity on articles relating to fetishism and bestiality is merely indicative of a high degree of interest in controversial topics in general, and that they may in fact be indicative of some form of bias or even a conflict of interest.

I agree that it's confusing, though... And one might also legitimately claim that FT2's editing activity on some of the articles in question might in itself be sufficiently suspect that his identity wouldn't have to be an issue. I can at least say that the mods here have had plenty of discussions about this, and there's almost unanimous agreement that he's both sufficiently controversial and influential enough for this level of scrutiny, even if it ultimately turns out that little is gained by it.