 Admin watch, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Peter Damian |
 Wed 3rd December 2008, 5:06pm
Post
#1
|
 I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!  Group: Regulars Posts: 4,400 Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm Member No.: 4,212 WP user page - talk check - contribs  |
Apologies if this is already on another thread
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tony1/AdminWatch The talk page is quite funny |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| Kato |
Wed 14th January 2009, 3:38pm
Post
#2
|
 dhd Group: Regulars Posts: 5,521 Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm Member No.: 767 |
Tony seems to have got himself into a bitter dispute with the aforementioned MBisanz (T-C-L-K-R-D)
- ostensibly about some date delinking thing, but it was MBisanz who tried to strangle Tony's AdminWatch / AdminReview project at birth recently, and Tony reckons that MBisanz has more sinister motives to discredit him before it can be launched.
MBisanz is an occasional member here, but is prone to some silly antics. Remember him removing Brandt's comments from a BLP discussion page, and then running to the admins noticeboard to tell tales on PrivateMusings who rightfully restored them? Why is MBisanz so desperately trying to scupper Tony's AdminWatch project now? Anyway, here is Tony on some arbitration page, appealing to the court regarding MBisanz's latest slur attempt against him: QUOTE(Tony1) [MBisanz's] "involvement" concerns his leading an (unsuccessful) attempt to delete my AdminReview page, and the potential for conflict of interest in attempting to slur me in this judicial context by quoting me from that page he tried to delete, representing a comment I made which has nothing to do with either this case or incivility. I believe that both diffs should be withdrawn immediately: one as irrelevant; the other as in bad faith with potential conflict of interest. Tony (talk) 17:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| MBisanz |
Thu 15th January 2009, 1:38am
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Regulars Posts: 478 Joined: Sun 13th Apr 2008, 6:00am Member No.: 5,693 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
QUOTE(Kato @ Wed 14th January 2009, 4:38pm)  MBisanz is an occasional member here, but is prone to some silly antics. Remember him removing Brandt's comments from a BLP discussion page, and then running to the admins noticeboard to tell tales on PrivateMusings who rightfully restored them? I was not the person who removed Brandt's comments: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=204742064 |
|
|
|
| Somey |
Thu 15th January 2009, 5:00am
Post
#4
|
 Can't actually moderate Group: Moderators Posts: 11,814 Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm From: Dreamland Member No.: 275 |
QUOTE(MBisanz @ Wed 14th January 2009, 7:38pm) I was not the person who removed Brandt's comments: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=204742064 Probably an easy-enough mistake to make, though: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=204742064 Still, you've supported tougher blocking rules for BLP vandals and changing the AfD default to "delete" for BLP's, so perhaps this isn't an area for which you deserve bashing. I was looking at some of your comments on User talk:Tony1/AdminReview/Archive_2 (T-H-L-K-D), and it looks like most of your stated objections are fairly reasonable, though based primarily on hypothetical scenarios that probably wouldn't come up very often. It seems like something rather nasty must have happened to cause you to somewhat-suddenly label the proposal an "attack page" and try to get it deleted... So what was it, exactly?  |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Peter Damian Admin watch Wed 3rd December 2008, 5:06pm
Kato That Tony1 guy is a real ballbreaker but he demand... Wed 3rd December 2008, 5:20pm Son of a Yeti
Apologies if this is already on another thread
h... Wed 3rd December 2008, 6:51pm Kato Despite a bunch of admins (led by that rather sini... Mon 29th December 2008, 4:19pm
Peter Damian
Despite a bunch of admins (led by that rather sin... Mon 29th December 2008, 5:24pm Basil
Tony is a good guy who has been with the project ... Mon 29th December 2008, 10:45pm Obesity
I expect that will have something to do with this... Mon 29th December 2008, 11:27pm Eva Destruction
I expect that will have something to do with this... Mon 29th December 2008, 11:27pm Kato Scroll down the deletion debate page for Tony... Tue 30th December 2008, 2:34am Queeran Hey look - they had a nice pile-on on WP:ANI, foll... Fri 2nd January 2009, 7:47pm LessHorrid vanU
Hey look - they had a nice pile-on on WP:ANI, fol... Fri 2nd January 2009, 8:29pm Queeran What you really MEAN to say is YOU abused someone,... Fri 2nd January 2009, 9:31pm Black Kite
And then of course there's the lying scum shi... Fri 2nd January 2009, 10:41pm Queeran Quoth the lying shitfucking asswad Black Kite, ... Fri 2nd January 2009, 11:04pm Peter Damian [ blanked - all these people, including the admins... Fri 2nd January 2009, 11:06pm Black Kite
Black Kite, as I remember, was the one Wales warn... Fri 2nd January 2009, 11:18pm Castle Rock
What you really MEAN to say is YOU abused someone... Fri 2nd January 2009, 11:10pm Queeran I don't have "trolling socks", or an... Fri 2nd January 2009, 11:25pm Castle Rock
I don't have "trolling socks", or a... Fri 2nd January 2009, 11:58pm GlassBeadGame A thread discussing a Wikipedia users attempt at m... Fri 2nd January 2009, 11:31pm Black Kite Strangely I tend to call bullshit as I find it, bu... Fri 2nd January 2009, 11:37pm Somey Personally, I'd have to say that anyone using ... Sat 3rd January 2009, 12:17am Kato
...we'll probably have to treat it as a thre... Sat 3rd January 2009, 12:35am Moulton See also Narcissistic Wounding. Sat 3rd January 2009, 12:35am Random832 Speaking of thread derailment... Sat 3rd January 2009, 5:08am Kato Renamed "AdminReview" from AdminWatch.
... Sun 4th January 2009, 1:19am Anonymous editor link Wed 14th January 2009, 1:37am Kato
[quote name='Kato' post='151150' date='Wed 14th J... Thu 15th January 2009, 1:03pm Kato Tony is still plugging away.
One important potent... Mon 19th January 2009, 12:45pm Moulton One important potential problem they'll need t... Mon 19th January 2009, 1:09pm Kato The challenge is whether anyone in the Wikisphere ... Mon 19th January 2009, 1:16pm Kato Tony's now taking a look at the Policies for A... Fri 23rd January 2009, 3:12am Milton Roe
A paradox. For if "Mr. Sanger" was rig... Tue 3rd February 2009, 5:51pm the fieryangel
A paradox. For if "Mr. Sanger" was ri... Tue 3rd February 2009, 11:23pm Milton Roe
A paradox. For if "Mr. Sanger" was r... Wed 4th February 2009, 1:47am the fieryangel
Alas, it also contains a few people like David Ge... Wed 4th February 2009, 9:52am EricBarbour The vote on keeping AdminWatch is a fairly good in... Fri 23rd January 2009, 4:07am LaraLove
Dollar says someone high up in the cabal will del... Fri 23rd January 2009, 4:14am everyking
The vote on keeping AdminWatch is a fairly good i... Fri 23rd January 2009, 4:51am MBisanz
Sceptre, MBisanz, MZMcBride, Redvers, Scarian an... Fri 23rd January 2009, 4:57am Anonymous editor
The vote on keeping AdminWatch is a fairly good i... Fri 23rd January 2009, 5:43am Kato Tony debates with User:Jayron, on a subpage here. ... Fri 23rd January 2009, 4:12pm EricBarbour At present, probably the most productive "Adm... Sat 24th January 2009, 8:50am Kato According to Tony
Elections for the Coordinators ... Tue 3rd February 2009, 4:20pm Obesity
According to Tony
Elections for the Coordinators... Tue 3rd February 2009, 4:33pm GlassBeadGame
According to Tony
[quote=Tony1]Elections for the... Tue 3rd February 2009, 4:37pm Sarcasticidealist This just in: The Fieryangel thinks that people sh... Tue 3rd February 2009, 11:30pm EricBarbour It's still there, now called AdminReview.
No ... Wed 25th February 2009, 9:15am Kato There are still debates going on in the talk page,... Wed 25th February 2009, 11:49am Jon Awbrey
There are still debates going on in the talk page... Wed 25th February 2009, 12:39pm CharlotteWebb
On another thread, someone here talked about impl... Wed 25th February 2009, 3:32pm Sarcasticidealist In a nutshell, who (once again, not named "Br... Wed 25th February 2009, 3:41pm JoseClutch
[quote name='CharlotteWebb' post='158364' date='W... Wed 25th February 2009, 4:47pm CharlotteWebb
In fact, I would be surprised if there were a doz... Wed 25th February 2009, 5:20pm Somey
How much of this (your viewpoint) hinges on admin... Wed 25th February 2009, 6:11pm JoseClutch
In fact, I would be surprised if there were a do... Wed 25th February 2009, 7:36pm Newyorkbrad
[quote name='CharlotteWebb' post='158385' date='W... Wed 25th February 2009, 10:18pm Eva Destruction
[A reconfirmation process won't work…]
Whe... Wed 25th February 2009, 10:32pm Newyorkbrad
[A reconfirmation process won't work…]
Wh... Wed 25th February 2009, 10:35pm Eva Destruction
[quote name='Eva Destruction' post='158479' date=... Wed 25th February 2009, 10:38pm Milton Roe
My hunch is that most admins would be reconfirmed... Wed 25th February 2009, 10:40pm EricBarbour It is difficult to predict what sort of norms migh... Wed 25th February 2009, 10:45pm Sarcasticidealist His Wiki-buddies do it for him. They serve at his ... Thu 26th February 2009, 2:44am GlassBeadGame
His Wiki-buddies do it for him. They serve at his... Thu 26th February 2009, 3:01am EricBarbour
Agree. Mr. Wales' greatest disservice to Wiki... Thu 26th February 2009, 4:49am Moulton [quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='158523' date='We... Thu 26th February 2009, 5:21am One
[quote name='EricBarbour' post='158487' date='Wed... Thu 26th February 2009, 4:27am Jon Awbrey
Once again, I think this hits the mark. Jimbo see... Thu 26th February 2009, 4:32am Kelly Martin There are 1600 administrators on the English Wikip... Thu 26th February 2009, 3:15am CharlotteWebb
A majority (even without the effective lowering o... Wed 25th February 2009, 4:56pm Sarcasticidealist I forgot to mention, no self-noms. But yes, one co... Wed 25th February 2009, 5:01pm CharlotteWebb
Not sure of the meaning of your quotation marks, ... Wed 25th February 2009, 6:03pm A Horse With No Name
On another thread, someone here talked about imp... Wed 25th February 2009, 3:53pm Kelly Martin Which current admins other than Newyorkbrad you th... Wed 25th February 2009, 6:21pm CharlotteWebb
I'm sure quite a lot would be. We just don... Wed 25th February 2009, 6:43pm Bottled_Spider Which current admins other than Newyorkbrad you th... Wed 25th February 2009, 6:32pm EricBarbour I say it's time to look at the [i]badmin probl... Wed 25th February 2009, 7:29pm Sarcasticidealist I still think that if Jimbo and his top whores (Ba... Wed 25th February 2009, 8:59pm Milton Roe
I still think that if Jimbo and his top whores (B... Wed 25th February 2009, 9:49pm Kato One of the leading supporters - and apparently an ... Tue 10th March 2009, 7:10pm Cla68
One of the leading supporters - and apparently an... Tue 10th March 2009, 11:33pm Kato The election to the Admin Review team has been mov... Wed 18th March 2009, 2:07am seicer "We need to institute at least basic measures... Wed 18th March 2009, 4:27am east.718 Perfect is the enemy of good. Wed 18th March 2009, 4:28am EricBarbour Could swear someone else wrote a similar proposal-... Wed 18th March 2009, 4:58am |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th 5 13, 4:43am |