| |
|
  |
Today is the final day for nominations, for the 2009 WP:DICK of Distinction awards pageant |
|
|
| Sarcasticidealist |
Wed 14th January 2009, 4:12pm
|

Head exploded.
     
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,662
Joined: Tue 22nd Jan 2008, 1:54am
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Member No.: 4,536
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Kato @ Wed 14th January 2009, 9:04am)  My personal fave Dick of Distinction for 2007, George William Herbert, also faded this year. No longer were we treated to some of most preposterous comments you'll ever read. He's also demonstrated real humility on a few occasions, including the aftermath of Mantanmoreland. I give him substantial points for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarcasticidealist |
Wed 14th January 2009, 10:53pm
|

Head exploded.
     
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,662
Joined: Tue 22nd Jan 2008, 1:54am
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Member No.: 4,536
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 14th January 2009, 2:42pm)  And I'm not sure whether Sarcastic or Root are admins. I am, Root isn't. And while I am sincerely flattered to be nominated (for a category that doesn't exist, granted, but still) I don't think my name belongs there. While I'm very proud of my views on BLPs, I don't do a lot of campaigning on the subject, since I've concluded that changing policy on Wikipedia is not actually possible. I'm pretty much a gadfly on this issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| victim of censorship |
Thu 15th January 2009, 6:09am
|

Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
     
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,143
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640

|
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 12th January 2009, 10:19pm)   We are now accepting nominations for the 3rd Annual Wikipedia Review WP:DICK of Distinction awards pageant. Newcomers can acquaint themselves with the history of this star-studded gala event by following this link. The categories are as follows: WP:DICK of DistinctionThis award goes to the admin who most consistently and corruptly abuses the tools. I'll get the ball rolling by proposing these favorites from previous years, all of whom have made their mark over the past year: JzG Jayjg Will Beback Miss IncongenialityAs if any explanation were needed, this is for the admin that most consistently and aggressively flouts WP:CIVIL. The Tag-Team EventThis category, which is open to non-admins, is one of many attributes that the WMF has borrowed from its sister organization, the WWF.The Straight ShooterThis event is open to admins only, and the award goes to the admin who most honestly and diligently attempts to exercise his or her authority in accordance with WP:NOT. Since we now have a bumper crop of admins who have joined the Review, I would like to invite them to self-nominate and engage in shameless electioneering -- knowing that they will be held to whatever promises they may make. Nominees: Thatcher131 Jehochman Cool Hand Luke Newyorkbrad Cojones de latónThis award goes to non-admins who boldly confront the cabal. Nominees: Giano Cla68 The Fat Man Who Never Came Back George the Dragon Alanyst Please post your nominees for the various categories in this thread. I'll keep a running tally of the nominees, and in about a month, members of the Academy will be invited to cast their votes. Please ad the Grand Gramiliel to your list under WP:DICK of Distinction
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alison |
Thu 15th January 2009, 6:21am
|

Skinny Cow!
       
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,514
Joined: Tue 26th Jun 2007, 8:08pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 1,806

|
QUOTE(UseOnceAndDestroy @ Wed 14th January 2009, 7:37am)  QUOTE(Alison @ Wed 14th January 2009, 2:31am)  all the honourable stuff he's done behind the scenes over the last year (that you guys don't know about  ). He's as straight as they get. Somehow, "does stuff" + "no one knows about it" does not equal "straight", I reckon. Yeah, I know  I can't really say much more than that, obviously, so it's only my word an' all ... However, Thatcher policed Checkuser, and policed it well when he was on the inside. That shows up in his Quis custodiet ipsos custodes essay. What he didnt' say was that he personally called a few people out on their c/u shenanigans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| One |
Thu 15th January 2009, 7:29am
|

Postmaster General
       
Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,553
Joined: Tue 25th Dec 2007, 10:49am
Member No.: 4,284
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Alison @ Thu 15th January 2009, 6:21am)  QUOTE(UseOnceAndDestroy @ Wed 14th January 2009, 7:37am)  QUOTE(Alison @ Wed 14th January 2009, 2:31am)  all the honourable stuff he's done behind the scenes over the last year (that you guys don't know about  ). He's as straight as they get. Somehow, "does stuff" + "no one knows about it" does not equal "straight", I reckon. Yeah, I know  I can't really say much more than that, obviously, so it's only my word an' all ... However, Thatcher policed Checkuser, and policed it well when he was on the inside. That shows up in his Quis custodiet ipsos custodes essay. What he didnt' say was that he personally called a few people out on their c/u shenanigans. Yep. He's a reformer on the inside. He's careful, and a straight shooter to his core. I've felt this way for ages. Incidentally, there's been a lot of credit thrown around for Mantanmoreland. I think that Thatcher deserves more than a little praise for the case. He did something subtle, but essential. He filled that CU request, even though WordBomb filed it. He filled carefully, relaying the details needed to start SirFozzie's investigation. He had only been a CU for three weeks at the time, and it would have been very easy to just issue "inconclusive" and move on. He also caught Bassettcat--I think there would still be a cloud hanging over the case if he didn't cleanly vindicate the conclusions by catching him again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Kato |
Thu 15th January 2009, 12:31pm
|

dhd
        
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767

|
QUOTE(One @ Thu 15th January 2009, 7:29am)  QUOTE(Alison @ Thu 15th January 2009, 6:21am)  QUOTE(UseOnceAndDestroy @ Wed 14th January 2009, 7:37am)  QUOTE(Alison @ Wed 14th January 2009, 2:31am)  all the honourable stuff he's done behind the scenes over the last year (that you guys don't know about  ). He's as straight as they get. Somehow, "does stuff" + "no one knows about it" does not equal "straight", I reckon. Yeah, I know  I can't really say much more than that, obviously, so it's only my word an' all ... However, Thatcher policed Checkuser, and policed it well when he was on the inside. That shows up in his Quis custodiet ipsos custodes essay. What he didnt' say was that he personally called a few people out on their c/u shenanigans. Yep. He's a reformer on the inside. He's careful, and a straight shooter to his core. I've felt this way for ages. Incidentally, there's been a lot of credit thrown around for Mantanmoreland. I think that Thatcher deserves more than a little praise for the case. He did something subtle, but essential. He filled that CU request, even though WordBomb filed it. He filled carefully, relaying the details needed to start SirFozzie's investigation. He had only been a CU for three weeks at the time, and it would have been very easy to just issue "inconclusive" and move on. He also caught Bassettcat--I think there would still be a cloud hanging over the case if he didn't cleanly vindicate the conclusions by catching him again. That said, Thatcher got himself in a muddle over Mantanmoreland before that - and wasn't particularly helpful previously by all accounts. http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showt...896&hl=ThatcherThe most reasonable thing I saw Thatcher do was bring up the Lyndon LaRouche case a long while back - making an issue of the Conflicts of Interest held by Berlet and Dennis King, and highlighting some of the entrenched problems that blight those articles to Arbcom. It was refreshing to see someone ostensibly neutral and uninvolved get that aired on Wiki.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Kato |
Thu 15th January 2009, 12:38pm
|

dhd
        
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767

|
QUOTE(The Wales Hunter @ Thu 15th January 2009, 3:23am)  A quick nomination (I'll do the rest when I wake up):
Cojones de latón
SlimVirgin. Not an admin and has confronted the CABAL while not an admin.
In that case, where's Wikipedia Review? Stick 'im on the list! Last year, I nominated Greg and JzG for the tag team slot, for their combined work on the Arch Coal article! QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 14th January 2009, 9:42pm)  QUOTE(Kato @ Wed 14th January 2009, 8:04am)  Anti-defamation campaigner of the year- Sarcasticidealist
- DocGlasgow
- Privatemusings
- Rootology (for getting that flagged revisions ball rolling)
[ We've got Privatemusings as a Cojones nominee. Doc is an admin-- did you want to put him up for Straight Shooter? And I'm not sure whether Sarcastic or Root are admins. Did you wish to nominate them for one of the categories? I'm not nominating these guys for your categories Hersch - I was just making general points about the year. I nominated Gerard, Jimbo and Filll (who apparently is not an admin) for the Dick, Cool Hand Luke for the straight shooter, and Privatemusings and Wikipedia Review for the Cojones de latón. The rest are specific things about individuals that I noticed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Herschelkrustofsky |
Thu 15th January 2009, 3:43pm
|
Member
        
Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:50am)  Oh and Bishonen for the 'cojones' bit. She.
She's an admin, so that would be Straight Shooter. QUOTE(Kato @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:31am)  The most reasonable thing I saw Thatcher do was bring up the Lyndon LaRouche case a long while back - making an issue of the Conflicts of Interest held by Berlet and Dennis King, and highlighting some of the entrenched problems that blight those articles to Arbcom. It was refreshing to see someone ostensibly neutral and uninvolved get that aired on Wiki.
Yes, I liked that one also. But earlier, Thatcher backed up Will Beback on the issue of the unique Wikipedia ban on using LaRouche publications as sources, whether it be for graphics on geometry examples, data on India's thorium reactor program, or the biography of Jose Rizal. So, I guess all this means that Thatcher is neutral. QUOTE(The Wales Hunter @ Thu 15th January 2009, 3:23am)  A quick nomination (I'll do the rest when I wake up):
Cojones de latón
SlimVirgin. Not an admin and has confronted the CABAL while not an admin.
You know, I was just thinking that we are in a real watershed moment, what with the possibility of Regime Change in the U.S. next week, and the fact that no one had nominated SlimVirgin in this competition. And here she is, being nominated for Cojones de latón! QUOTE(Kato @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:38am)  QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 14th January 2009, 9:42pm)  QUOTE(Kato @ Wed 14th January 2009, 8:04am)  Anti-defamation campaigner of the year- Sarcasticidealist
- DocGlasgow
- Privatemusings
- Rootology (for getting that flagged revisions ball rolling)
[ We've got Privatemusings as a Cojones nominee. Doc is an admin-- did you want to put him up for Straight Shooter? And I'm not sure whether Sarcastic or Root are admins. Did you wish to nominate them for one of the categories? I'm not nominating these guys for your categories Hersch - I was just making general points about the year. Do you want them removed? The nominees thus far are as follows: WP:DICK of DistinctionDavid Gerard FT2 Gamaliel Jayjg Jimbo Wales JzG Raul654 Will Beback Miss IncongenialityScarian KillerChihuahua JzG The Tag-Team EventWill Beback and John Nevard Odd nature, Salmon of Doubt, KillerChihuahua, Jim62sch, and FeloniousMonk The Straight ShooterThis event is open to admins only, and the award goes to the admin who most honestly and diligently attempts to exercise his or her authority in accordance with WP:NOT. Since we now have a bumper crop of admins who have joined the Review, I would like to invite them to self-nominate and engage in shameless electioneering -- knowing that they will be held to whatever promises they may make. Nominees: Bishonen Thatcher131 Jehochman Cool Hand Luke Newyorkbrad SirFozzie SarcasticIdealist DocGlasgow Cojones de latónThis award goes to non-admins who boldly confront the cabal. Nominees: Giano Cla68 The Fat Man Who Never Came Back George the Dragon Alanyst Dragon695 Peter Damian Privatemusings Rootology SlimVirgin Wikipedia Review Please post your nominees for the various categories in this thread. I'll keep a running tally of the nominees, and in about a month, members of the Academy will be invited to cast their votes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| everyking |
Thu 15th January 2009, 4:01pm
|
Postmaster
      
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81

|
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:43pm)  QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:50am)  Oh and Bishonen for the 'cojones' bit. She.
She's an admin, so that would be Straight Shooter. In the recent incident, Bishonen used the same abusive method so often used by the "cabal": she imposed a unilateral, obviously controversial block without any community deliberation beforehand. It was plain and simple bullying, representative of a destructive mode of problem-solving, and she should not get any credit for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Friday |
Thu 15th January 2009, 5:46pm
|
Member
  
Group: Contributors
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed 24th Dec 2008, 7:00am
Member No.: 9,513
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(everyking @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:01pm)  In the recent incident, Bishonen used the same abusive method so often used by the "cabal": she imposed a unilateral, obviously controversial block without any community deliberation beforehand. It was plain and simple bullying, representative of a destructive mode of problem-solving, and she should not get any credit for it.
It was unconventional, sure, but was any real harm done? Also.. it worked, apparently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| One |
Thu 15th January 2009, 8:23pm
|

Postmaster General
       
Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,553
Joined: Tue 25th Dec 2007, 10:49am
Member No.: 4,284
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Kato @ Thu 15th January 2009, 12:31pm)  QUOTE(One @ Thu 15th January 2009, 7:29am)  QUOTE(Alison @ Thu 15th January 2009, 6:21am)  QUOTE(UseOnceAndDestroy @ Wed 14th January 2009, 7:37am)  QUOTE(Alison @ Wed 14th January 2009, 2:31am)  all the honourable stuff he's done behind the scenes over the last year (that you guys don't know about  ). He's as straight as they get. Somehow, "does stuff" + "no one knows about it" does not equal "straight", I reckon. Yeah, I know  I can't really say much more than that, obviously, so it's only my word an' all ... However, Thatcher policed Checkuser, and policed it well when he was on the inside. That shows up in his Quis custodiet ipsos custodes essay. What he didnt' say was that he personally called a few people out on their c/u shenanigans. Yep. He's a reformer on the inside. He's careful, and a straight shooter to his core. I've felt this way for ages. Incidentally, there's been a lot of credit thrown around for Mantanmoreland. I think that Thatcher deserves more than a little praise for the case. He did something subtle, but essential. He filled that CU request, even though WordBomb filed it. He filled carefully, relaying the details needed to start SirFozzie's investigation. He had only been a CU for three weeks at the time, and it would have been very easy to just issue "inconclusive" and move on. He also caught Bassettcat--I think there would still be a cloud hanging over the case if he didn't cleanly vindicate the conclusions by catching him again. That said, Thatcher got himself in a muddle over Mantanmoreland before that - and wasn't particularly helpful previously by all accounts. http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showt...896&hl=ThatcherNo, Piperdown apparently saw Thatcher say SH when he meant MM, so jumped to several nefarious conclusions. In this same period, Piperdown also suggested that Cool Hand Luke was a pro-Mantanmoreland sock. He's a nice guy and all, but I wouldn't rely on Piperdown to interpret anything subtle. Thatcher was a hero on the Mantanmoreland case, period. I think that I have at least a little credibility saying so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| EricBarbour |
Thu 15th January 2009, 10:54pm
|

blah
        
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 14th January 2009, 7:30am)  The "Drama Queen" idea has merit, but then again, isn't every category just a variation on that theme? Problem is, there's too damn many possible nominees for that. QUOTE In the recent incident, Bishonen used the same abusive method so often used by the "cabal": she imposed a unilateral, obviously controversial block without any community deliberation beforehand. It was plain and simple bullying, representative of a destructive mode of problem-solving, and she should not get any credit for it. And yet.....her pointless block of FT2 got things rolling..... I'd like to send her a big box of chocolates and a bouquet, simply for doing that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |