The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

10 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
> Today is the final day for nominations, for the 2009 WP:DICK of Distinction awards pageant
Rating  3
Kato
post Wed 14th January 2009, 4:04pm
Post #41


dhd
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767



2007 was the year of JzG - but this year he has been largely uncontroversial on WP. Likewise, Jayjg has been a shadow of his former self. I don't see that either of these two deserve to be on the list for 2008.

It's hard to think who has been the biggest "dick" this year. DocGlasgow ticks boxes on just about every category from Dick to Straight Shooter. The usual progressive BLP work was punctuated by a couple of howlers - memorably that manoeuvre to dampen the angry anti-Mantanmoreland movement, which merely wasted a few weeks of time by letting Mantan off the hook a little longer. (This isn't a nom for Doc by the way)

My personal fave Dick of Distinction for 2007, George William Herbert, also faded this year. No longer were we treated to some of most preposterous comments you'll ever read.


Anti-defamation campaigner of the year
  1. Sarcasticidealist
  2. DocGlasgow
  3. Privatemusings
  4. Rootology (for getting that flagged revisions ball rolling)

Comedy Moments of the Year


(Off the top of my head)
  1. JoshuaZ's hilarious denials of sockpuppetry - ghost vectors and all...
  2. Greg Kohs running for election to the WMF board
  3. Jossi's Conflict of Interest irony spiral - and the lame arguments of those who defended it
  4. Rachel Marsden's relentless goading of Jimbo on Valleywag
  5. That brutally audacious IP nomination for deletion of Alison Wheeler's BLP - it just made me laugh that's all.
Zero to Hero
Kelly Martin - uber controversial former Wikipedia Arbitrator turns astute and essential Wikipedia Reviewer.

Hero to Zero
David Shankbone - hapless and gregarious provider of free photographs turns hideous narcissistic revenge machine and poster-boy for the worst excesses of Web 2.0,
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sarcasticidealist
post Wed 14th January 2009, 4:12pm
Post #42


Head exploded.
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,662
Joined: Tue 22nd Jan 2008, 1:54am
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Member No.: 4,536

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kato @ Wed 14th January 2009, 9:04am) *
My personal fave Dick of Distinction for 2007, George William Herbert, also faded this year. No longer were we treated to some of most preposterous comments you'll ever read.
He's also demonstrated real humility on a few occasions, including the aftermath of Mantanmoreland. I give him substantial points for that.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Herschelkrustofsky
post Wed 14th January 2009, 9:42pm
Post #43


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kato @ Wed 14th January 2009, 8:04am) *


Anti-defamation campaigner of the year
  1. Sarcasticidealist
  2. DocGlasgow
  3. Privatemusings
  4. Rootology (for getting that flagged revisions ball rolling)
[


We've got Privatemusings as a Cojones nominee. Doc is an admin-- did you want to put him up for Straight Shooter? And I'm not sure whether Sarcastic or Root are admins. Did you wish to nominate them for one of the categories?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sarcasticidealist
post Wed 14th January 2009, 10:53pm
Post #44


Head exploded.
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,662
Joined: Tue 22nd Jan 2008, 1:54am
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Member No.: 4,536

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 14th January 2009, 2:42pm) *
And I'm not sure whether Sarcastic or Root are admins.
I am, Root isn't.

And while I am sincerely flattered to be nominated (for a category that doesn't exist, granted, but still) I don't think my name belongs there. While I'm very proud of my views on BLPs, I don't do a lot of campaigning on the subject, since I've concluded that changing policy on Wikipedia is not actually possible. I'm pretty much a gadfly on this issue.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Herschelkrustofsky
post Thu 15th January 2009, 12:22am
Post #45


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



I'm going to assume that if they are fighting the use of WP for defamation, they ought to be Straight Shooter or Cojones nominees. The nominees thus far are as follows:

WP:DICK of Distinction

David Gerard
FT2
Jayjg
Jimbo Wales
JzG
Raul654
Will Beback

Miss Incongeniality

Scarian
KillerChihuahua
JzG

The Tag-Team Event

Will Beback and John Nevard

The Straight Shooter

This event is open to admins only, and the award goes to the admin who most honestly and diligently attempts to exercise his or her authority in accordance with WP:NOT. Since we now have a bumper crop of admins who have joined the Review, I would like to invite them to self-nominate and engage in shameless electioneering -- knowing that they will be held to whatever promises they may make. Nominees:

Thatcher131
Jehochman
Cool Hand Luke
Newyorkbrad
SirFozzie
SarcasticIdealist
DocGlasgow

Cojones de latón

This award goes to non-admins who boldly confront the cabal. Nominees:

Giano
Cla68
The Fat Man Who Never Came Back
George the Dragon
Alanyst
Dragon695
Peter Damian
Privatemusings
Rootology


Please post your nominees for the various categories in this thread. I'll keep a running tally of the nominees, and in about a month, members of the Academy will be invited to cast their votes.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Wales Hunter
post Thu 15th January 2009, 3:23am
Post #46


Hackenslasher
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 869
Joined: Sun 30th Dec 2007, 11:29pm
Member No.: 4,319

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



A quick nomination (I'll do the rest when I wake up):

Cojones de latón

SlimVirgin. Not an admin and has confronted the CABAL while not an admin.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
victim of censorship
post Thu 15th January 2009, 6:09am
Post #47


Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,143
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640



QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 12th January 2009, 10:19pm) *

Image

We are now accepting nominations for the 3rd Annual Wikipedia Review WP:DICK of Distinction awards pageant. Newcomers can acquaint themselves with the history of this star-studded gala event by following this link.
The categories are as follows:

WP:DICK of Distinction

This award goes to the admin who most consistently and corruptly abuses the tools. I'll get the ball rolling by proposing these favorites from previous years, all of whom have made their mark over the past year:

JzG
Jayjg
Will Beback

Miss Incongeniality

As if any explanation were needed, this is for the admin that most consistently and aggressively flouts WP:CIVIL.

The Tag-Team Event

This category, which is open to non-admins, is one of many attributes that the WMF has borrowed from its sister organization, the WWF.

The Straight Shooter

This event is open to admins only, and the award goes to the admin who most honestly and diligently attempts to exercise his or her authority in accordance with WP:NOT. Since we now have a bumper crop of admins who have joined the Review, I would like to invite them to self-nominate and engage in shameless electioneering -- knowing that they will be held to whatever promises they may make. Nominees:

Thatcher131
Jehochman
Cool Hand Luke
Newyorkbrad

Cojones de latón

This award goes to non-admins who boldly confront the cabal. Nominees:

Giano
Cla68
The Fat Man Who Never Came Back
George the Dragon
Alanyst


Please post your nominees for the various categories in this thread. I'll keep a running tally of the nominees, and in about a month, members of the Academy will be invited to cast their votes.



Please ad the Grand Gramiliel to your list under WP:DICK of Distinction




User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alison
post Thu 15th January 2009, 6:21am
Post #48


Skinny Cow!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,514
Joined: Tue 26th Jun 2007, 8:08pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 1,806



QUOTE(UseOnceAndDestroy @ Wed 14th January 2009, 7:37am) *

QUOTE(Alison @ Wed 14th January 2009, 2:31am) *
all the honourable stuff he's done behind the scenes over the last year (that you guys don't know about ohmy.gif ). He's as straight as they get.


Somehow, "does stuff" + "no one knows about it" does not equal "straight", I reckon.

Yeah, I know dry.gif I can't really say much more than that, obviously, so it's only my word an' all ...

However, Thatcher policed Checkuser, and policed it well when he was on the inside. That shows up in his Quis custodiet ipsos custodes essay. What he didnt' say was that he personally called a few people out on their c/u shenanigans.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
One
post Thu 15th January 2009, 7:29am
Post #49


Postmaster General
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,553
Joined: Tue 25th Dec 2007, 10:49am
Member No.: 4,284

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Alison @ Thu 15th January 2009, 6:21am) *

QUOTE(UseOnceAndDestroy @ Wed 14th January 2009, 7:37am) *

QUOTE(Alison @ Wed 14th January 2009, 2:31am) *
all the honourable stuff he's done behind the scenes over the last year (that you guys don't know about ohmy.gif ). He's as straight as they get.


Somehow, "does stuff" + "no one knows about it" does not equal "straight", I reckon.

Yeah, I know dry.gif I can't really say much more than that, obviously, so it's only my word an' all ...

However, Thatcher policed Checkuser, and policed it well when he was on the inside. That shows up in his Quis custodiet ipsos custodes essay. What he didnt' say was that he personally called a few people out on their c/u shenanigans.


Yep. He's a reformer on the inside. He's careful, and a straight shooter to his core. I've felt this way for ages.

Incidentally, there's been a lot of credit thrown around for Mantanmoreland. I think that Thatcher deserves more than a little praise for the case. He did something subtle, but essential. He filled that CU request, even though WordBomb filed it. He filled carefully, relaying the details needed to start SirFozzie's investigation. He had only been a CU for three weeks at the time, and it would have been very easy to just issue "inconclusive" and move on. He also caught Bassettcat--I think there would still be a cloud hanging over the case if he didn't cleanly vindicate the conclusions by catching him again.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Thu 15th January 2009, 12:19pm
Post #50


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kato @ Tue 13th January 2009, 3:50pm) *

Dick of distinction


David Gerard

Gerard had yet another obnoxious year. With the ill fumes becoming ever more potent as the months proceeded. Not content with being the shadowy Svengali who oversighted FT2 into power, Gerard was instrumental in the collapse of Wikimedia UK. Gerard's charm offensives on many fronts were merely erm.. offensive.



I was about to nominate Gerard but others got there first. I had no experience of this guy until the current RfC. I was flabbergasted, words fail me &c.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kato
post Thu 15th January 2009, 12:31pm
Post #51


dhd
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767



QUOTE(One @ Thu 15th January 2009, 7:29am) *

QUOTE(Alison @ Thu 15th January 2009, 6:21am) *

QUOTE(UseOnceAndDestroy @ Wed 14th January 2009, 7:37am) *

QUOTE(Alison @ Wed 14th January 2009, 2:31am) *
all the honourable stuff he's done behind the scenes over the last year (that you guys don't know about ohmy.gif ). He's as straight as they get.


Somehow, "does stuff" + "no one knows about it" does not equal "straight", I reckon.

Yeah, I know dry.gif I can't really say much more than that, obviously, so it's only my word an' all ...

However, Thatcher policed Checkuser, and policed it well when he was on the inside. That shows up in his Quis custodiet ipsos custodes essay. What he didnt' say was that he personally called a few people out on their c/u shenanigans.


Yep. He's a reformer on the inside. He's careful, and a straight shooter to his core. I've felt this way for ages.

Incidentally, there's been a lot of credit thrown around for Mantanmoreland. I think that Thatcher deserves more than a little praise for the case. He did something subtle, but essential. He filled that CU request, even though WordBomb filed it. He filled carefully, relaying the details needed to start SirFozzie's investigation. He had only been a CU for three weeks at the time, and it would have been very easy to just issue "inconclusive" and move on. He also caught Bassettcat--I think there would still be a cloud hanging over the case if he didn't cleanly vindicate the conclusions by catching him again.

That said, Thatcher got himself in a muddle over Mantanmoreland before that - and wasn't particularly helpful previously by all accounts.

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showt...896&hl=Thatcher

The most reasonable thing I saw Thatcher do was bring up the Lyndon LaRouche case a long while back - making an issue of the Conflicts of Interest held by Berlet and Dennis King, and highlighting some of the entrenched problems that blight those articles to Arbcom. It was refreshing to see someone ostensibly neutral and uninvolved get that aired on Wiki.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
UseOnceAndDestroy
post Thu 15th January 2009, 12:33pm
Post #52


Über Member
*****

Group: Moderators
Posts: 568
Joined: Fri 7th Dec 2007, 3:43pm
Member No.: 4,073



[Mod note: For readability, moved various posts of an irish flavour to the lounge: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=22387]
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kato
post Thu 15th January 2009, 12:38pm
Post #53


dhd
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767



QUOTE(The Wales Hunter @ Thu 15th January 2009, 3:23am) *

A quick nomination (I'll do the rest when I wake up):

Cojones de latón

SlimVirgin. Not an admin and has confronted the CABAL while not an admin.

In that case, where's Wikipedia Review? Stick 'im on the list!

Last year, I nominated Greg and JzG for the tag team slot, for their combined work on the Arch Coal article!

QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 14th January 2009, 9:42pm) *

QUOTE(Kato @ Wed 14th January 2009, 8:04am) *


Anti-defamation campaigner of the year
  1. Sarcasticidealist
  2. DocGlasgow
  3. Privatemusings
  4. Rootology (for getting that flagged revisions ball rolling)
[


We've got Privatemusings as a Cojones nominee. Doc is an admin-- did you want to put him up for Straight Shooter? And I'm not sure whether Sarcastic or Root are admins. Did you wish to nominate them for one of the categories?

I'm not nominating these guys for your categories Hersch - I was just making general points about the year.

I nominated Gerard, Jimbo and Filll (who apparently is not an admin) for the Dick, Cool Hand Luke for the straight shooter, and Privatemusings and Wikipedia Review for the Cojones de latón. The rest are specific things about individuals that I noticed.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Thu 15th January 2009, 12:50pm
Post #54


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Oh and Bishonen for the 'cojones' bit. She.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Herschelkrustofsky
post Thu 15th January 2009, 3:43pm
Post #55


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:50am) *

Oh and Bishonen for the 'cojones' bit. She.
She's an admin, so that would be Straight Shooter.


QUOTE(Kato @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:31am) *

The most reasonable thing I saw Thatcher do was bring up the Lyndon LaRouche case a long while back - making an issue of the Conflicts of Interest held by Berlet and Dennis King, and highlighting some of the entrenched problems that blight those articles to Arbcom. It was refreshing to see someone ostensibly neutral and uninvolved get that aired on Wiki.
Yes, I liked that one also. But earlier, Thatcher backed up Will Beback on the issue of the unique Wikipedia ban on using LaRouche publications as sources, whether it be for graphics on geometry examples, data on India's thorium reactor program, or the biography of Jose Rizal. So, I guess all this means that Thatcher is neutral.


QUOTE(The Wales Hunter @ Thu 15th January 2009, 3:23am) *

A quick nomination (I'll do the rest when I wake up):

Cojones de latón

SlimVirgin. Not an admin and has confronted the CABAL while not an admin.
You know, I was just thinking that we are in a real watershed moment, what with the possibility of Regime Change in the U.S. next week, and the fact that no one had nominated SlimVirgin in this competition. And here she is, being nominated for Cojones de latón!


QUOTE(Kato @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:38am) *

QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 14th January 2009, 9:42pm) *

QUOTE(Kato @ Wed 14th January 2009, 8:04am) *


Anti-defamation campaigner of the year
  1. Sarcasticidealist
  2. DocGlasgow
  3. Privatemusings
  4. Rootology (for getting that flagged revisions ball rolling)
[


We've got Privatemusings as a Cojones nominee. Doc is an admin-- did you want to put him up for Straight Shooter? And I'm not sure whether Sarcastic or Root are admins. Did you wish to nominate them for one of the categories?

I'm not nominating these guys for your categories Hersch - I was just making general points about the year.
Do you want them removed?


The nominees thus far are as follows:

WP:DICK of Distinction

David Gerard
FT2
Gamaliel
Jayjg
Jimbo Wales
JzG
Raul654
Will Beback

Miss Incongeniality

Scarian
KillerChihuahua
JzG

The Tag-Team Event

Will Beback and John Nevard
Odd nature, Salmon of Doubt, KillerChihuahua, Jim62sch, and FeloniousMonk

The Straight Shooter

This event is open to admins only, and the award goes to the admin who most honestly and diligently attempts to exercise his or her authority in accordance with WP:NOT. Since we now have a bumper crop of admins who have joined the Review, I would like to invite them to self-nominate and engage in shameless electioneering -- knowing that they will be held to whatever promises they may make. Nominees:

Bishonen
Thatcher131
Jehochman
Cool Hand Luke
Newyorkbrad
SirFozzie
SarcasticIdealist
DocGlasgow

Cojones de latón

This award goes to non-admins who boldly confront the cabal. Nominees:

Giano
Cla68
The Fat Man Who Never Came Back
George the Dragon
Alanyst
Dragon695
Peter Damian
Privatemusings
Rootology
SlimVirgin
Wikipedia Review

Please post your nominees for the various categories in this thread. I'll keep a running tally of the nominees, and in about a month, members of the Academy will be invited to cast their votes.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
everyking
post Thu 15th January 2009, 4:01pm
Post #56


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81



QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:43pm) *

QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:50am) *

Oh and Bishonen for the 'cojones' bit. She.
She's an admin, so that would be Straight Shooter.


In the recent incident, Bishonen used the same abusive method so often used by the "cabal": she imposed a unilateral, obviously controversial block without any community deliberation beforehand. It was plain and simple bullying, representative of a destructive mode of problem-solving, and she should not get any credit for it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Friday
post Thu 15th January 2009, 5:46pm
Post #57


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed 24th Dec 2008, 7:00am
Member No.: 9,513

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(everyking @ Thu 15th January 2009, 4:01pm) *

In the recent incident, Bishonen used the same abusive method so often used by the "cabal": she imposed a unilateral, obviously controversial block without any community deliberation beforehand. It was plain and simple bullying, representative of a destructive mode of problem-solving, and she should not get any credit for it.


It was unconventional, sure, but was any real harm done? Also.. it worked, apparently.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
One
post Thu 15th January 2009, 8:23pm
Post #58


Postmaster General
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,553
Joined: Tue 25th Dec 2007, 10:49am
Member No.: 4,284

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kato @ Thu 15th January 2009, 12:31pm) *

QUOTE(One @ Thu 15th January 2009, 7:29am) *

QUOTE(Alison @ Thu 15th January 2009, 6:21am) *

QUOTE(UseOnceAndDestroy @ Wed 14th January 2009, 7:37am) *

QUOTE(Alison @ Wed 14th January 2009, 2:31am) *
all the honourable stuff he's done behind the scenes over the last year (that you guys don't know about ohmy.gif ). He's as straight as they get.


Somehow, "does stuff" + "no one knows about it" does not equal "straight", I reckon.

Yeah, I know dry.gif I can't really say much more than that, obviously, so it's only my word an' all ...

However, Thatcher policed Checkuser, and policed it well when he was on the inside. That shows up in his Quis custodiet ipsos custodes essay. What he didnt' say was that he personally called a few people out on their c/u shenanigans.


Yep. He's a reformer on the inside. He's careful, and a straight shooter to his core. I've felt this way for ages.

Incidentally, there's been a lot of credit thrown around for Mantanmoreland. I think that Thatcher deserves more than a little praise for the case. He did something subtle, but essential. He filled that CU request, even though WordBomb filed it. He filled carefully, relaying the details needed to start SirFozzie's investigation. He had only been a CU for three weeks at the time, and it would have been very easy to just issue "inconclusive" and move on. He also caught Bassettcat--I think there would still be a cloud hanging over the case if he didn't cleanly vindicate the conclusions by catching him again.

That said, Thatcher got himself in a muddle over Mantanmoreland before that - and wasn't particularly helpful previously by all accounts.

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showt...896&hl=Thatcher

No, Piperdown apparently saw Thatcher say SH when he meant MM, so jumped to several nefarious conclusions. In this same period, Piperdown also suggested that Cool Hand Luke was a pro-Mantanmoreland sock.

He's a nice guy and all, but I wouldn't rely on Piperdown to interpret anything subtle. Thatcher was a hero on the Mantanmoreland case, period. I think that I have at least a little credibility saying so.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jonathan
post Thu 15th January 2009, 9:00pm
Post #59


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 7:06pm
Member No.: 131



I think there should definitely be a Lifetime Achievement of DICK DISTINCTION and it should be awarded automatically to PoetGuy. Because really, this went far beyond mere sockpuppetry and became THE major wiki story of the year. S/h/it affected many with its trolling this year and I think the PoetEntity definitely deserves the highest "honour" this year.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Thu 15th January 2009, 10:54pm
Post #60


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 14th January 2009, 7:30am) *
The "Drama Queen" idea has merit, but then again, isn't every category just a variation on that theme?

Problem is, there's too damn many possible nominees for that.

QUOTE
In the recent incident, Bishonen used the same abusive method so often used by the "cabal": she imposed a unilateral, obviously controversial block without any community deliberation beforehand. It was plain and simple bullying, representative of a destructive mode of problem-solving, and she should not get any credit for it.

And yet.....her pointless block of FT2 got things rolling.....
I'd like to send her a big box of chocolates and a bouquet, simply for doing that.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

10 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 5 13, 8:58pm