The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

27 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Bishonen indef-blocks FT2, Holy crap, he hasn't been desysopped by Jimbo
trenton
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:22pm
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri 12th Sep 2008, 10:21pm
Member No.: 8,237



QUOTE(Dzonatas @ Tue 13th January 2009, 4:19pm) *

I'm surprised the unblock hasn't been taken to ArbCom for the wheel-war bit.

Hypocrisy at a finest.


The block should have been labeled as "Arbitration Enforcement" wink.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirFozzie
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:23pm
Post #22


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 806
Joined: Thu 29th Mar 2007, 3:32pm
Member No.: 1,200

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(sarcasticidealist @ Tue 13th January 2009, 5:21pm) *

QUOTE(Dzonatas @ Tue 13th January 2009, 3:19pm) *
I'm surprised the unblock hasn't been taken to ArbCom for the wheel-war bit.
As far as I am aware, nobody has ever been sanctioned for wheel-warring for undoing a single admin action (that hadn't already been undone). According to the letter of [[WP:WHEEL]], wheel-warring doesn't actually start until somebody redoes an admin action that has already been undone once, and I believe that's usually how it's enforced (when it's enforced).


Correct. There's an additional caveat , however, that undoing an Arbitration Committee Action (or an ArbCom Enforcement action, which by default is an arbitration action) unilaterally without discussion is considered a "Real Bad Thing." (That came out recently)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Anonymous editor
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:23pm
Post #23


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon 4th Aug 2008, 6:21pm
Member No.: 7,398



sarcasticidealist (who is here and I'm sure will comment) put AN/I back on semi-protection.

also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_tal...otection_of_ANI

This post has been edited by Anonymous editor: Tue 13th January 2009, 10:27pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:25pm
Post #24


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



damn, this is one hot topic.

FT2 finally did it. He's become the OJ Simpson of Arbcom. wink.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sarcasticidealist
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:26pm
Post #25


Head exploded.
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,662
Joined: Tue 22nd Jan 2008, 1:54am
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Member No.: 4,536

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Tue 13th January 2009, 3:23pm) *
sarcasticidealist (who is here and I'm sure will comment) put AN/I back on semi-protection.
I actually misunderstood Tznkai's protection summary ("temporary halting high traffic to subpage"). I thought he meant that he was halting high traffic *to* a subpage (that being ANI). It didn't occur to me that "subpage" could be used as a verb. If I'd understood his summary properly, I wouldn't have unprotected. Oh well.

This post has been edited by sarcasticidealist: Tue 13th January 2009, 10:27pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
written by he who wrote it
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:27pm
Post #26


Commie Mutant Traitor
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon 25th Sep 2006, 6:50pm
Member No.: 431



QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Tue 13th January 2009, 10:17pm) *

QUOTE(written by he who wrote it @ Tue 13th January 2009, 5:09pm) *

Clearly she's fed up with FT2's inability (or deliberate refusal) to give a straightforward answer to an apparently simple question. My guess is that she hopes the heat of a massive dramafest will force him to either answer or bail.


I'm struggling to understand how she could think causing a huge dramafest is a positive result. What is her goal here?

To shine a big effin' spotlight on FT2's bad behavior? To force FT2, and the arbcom, to quit stalling and either admit to misuse of oversight or explain why it wasn't actually a misuse? It's MeatBall:DirectAction.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wikiwhistle
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:28pm
Post #27


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,928
Joined: Mon 26th Nov 2007, 2:17pm
Member No.: 3,953



QUOTE(everyking @ Tue 13th January 2009, 9:58pm) *

It is simply ludicrous that people think they can solve problems like this. Yes, FT2 is obviously unfit to be an arbitrator, and arguably unfit to hold any position of responsibility on the site. But for Bishonen to swoop in and ban him based solely on her own say-so? It's just incredible to me that Wikipedia cannot grow out of such stupidity. FT2 is a long-standing contributor and any decision about blocking him should be based on the will of the community, not a single admin's say-so. Regardless of what happens to FT2, Bishonen (and/or her dinosaur alter-ego) should be desysopped.



It is bullying IMHO, what reason did she give? No-one can say he's disruptive, exceptionally, as an editor.

This post has been edited by wikiwhistle: Tue 13th January 2009, 10:29pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dzonatas
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:29pm
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon 9th Jun 2008, 8:40pm
Member No.: 6,529



QUOTE(sarcasticidealist @ Tue 13th January 2009, 2:21pm) *

QUOTE(Dzonatas @ Tue 13th January 2009, 3:19pm) *
I'm surprised the unblock hasn't been taken to ArbCom for the wheel-war bit.
As far as I am aware, nobody has ever been sanctioned for wheel-warring for undoing a single admin action (that hadn't already been undone). According to the letter of [[WP:WHEEL]], wheel-warring doesn't actually start until somebody redoes an admin action that has already been undone once, and I believe that's usually how it's enforced (when it's enforced).


Found the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...am_M._Connolley
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:30pm
Post #29


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Tue 13th January 2009, 2:56pm) *

I hope Bishonen thought long and hard about the amount of heat she's about to take before she did this.

Yeah, as in Image

Shame the flaming Godzilla version of Bish never made it to sysop, or the block could have been done by "it" as an even more drawwhmaitc move. Zoophilia fought with a radioactive Japanese monstermovie creature. Hmmm. Appropriate.

obliterate.gif

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Black Kite
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:30pm
Post #30


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun 14th Dec 2008, 11:10pm
Member No.: 9,403

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Dzonatas @ Tue 13th January 2009, 10:19pm) *

I'm surprised the unblock hasn't been taken to ArbCom for the wheel-war bit.


Well, sort of

This post has been edited by Black Kite: Tue 13th January 2009, 10:31pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Anonymous editor
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:31pm
Post #31


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon 4th Aug 2008, 6:21pm
Member No.: 7,398



QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 13th January 2009, 5:30pm) *

QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Tue 13th January 2009, 2:56pm) *

I hope Bishonen thought long and hard about the amount of heat she's about to take before she did this.

Yeah, as in Image

Shame the flaming Godzilla version of Bish never made it to sysop, or the block could have been done by "it" as an even more drawwhmaitc move. Zoophilia fought with a radioactive Japanese monstermovie creature. Hmmm. Appropriate.

obliterate.gif


the block was done by Bishzilla. Bishonen doesn't perform admin activities except through her sock.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sarcasticidealist
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:31pm
Post #32


Head exploded.
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,662
Joined: Tue 22nd Jan 2008, 1:54am
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Member No.: 4,536

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 13th January 2009, 3:30pm) *
Shame the flaming Godzilla version of Bish never made it to sysop, or the block could have been done by "it"
It was done by it - she had the bit transferred.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JoseClutch
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:32pm
Post #33


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue 24th Jul 2007, 5:39pm
Member No.: 2,078



QUOTE(everyking @ Tue 13th January 2009, 4:58pm) *

It is simply ludicrous that people think they can solve problems like this. Yes, FT2 is obviously unfit to be an arbitrator, and arguably unfit to hold any position of responsibility on the site. But for Bishonen to swoop in and ban him based solely on her own say-so? It's just incredible to me that Wikipedia cannot grow out of such stupidity. FT2 is a long-standing contributor and any decision about blocking him should be based on the will of the community, not a single admin's say-so. Regardless of what happens to FT2, Bishonen (and/or her dinosaur alter-ego) should be desysopped.

I never would have expect to see you in the "longstanding contributors should be unaccountable for their actions" crowd, who seem to be the ones advocating this hogwash.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:36pm
Post #34


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(sarcasticidealist @ Tue 13th January 2009, 3:31pm) *

QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 13th January 2009, 3:30pm) *
Shame the flaming Godzilla version of Bish never made it to sysop, or the block could have been done by "it"
It was done by it - she had the bit transferred.

Yikes. ohmy.gif Should have checked. Too many times when I parody or satirize WP for the lulz, I find the real thing has already equalled or outdone me. confused.gif

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dzonatas
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:39pm
Post #35


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon 9th Jun 2008, 8:40pm
Member No.: 6,529



QUOTE(Black Kite @ Tue 13th January 2009, 2:30pm) *

QUOTE(Dzonatas @ Tue 13th January 2009, 10:19pm) *

I'm surprised the unblock hasn't been taken to ArbCom for the wheel-war bit.


Well, sort of


*gasp*


QUOTE

Statement by Jehochman

I suggest the entire matter be sent to Jimbo for sorting. The Committee is not competent to handle this matter, or they would have done so already. Jehochman Talk 22:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
everyking
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:40pm
Post #36


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81



QUOTE(JoseClutch @ Tue 13th January 2009, 11:32pm) *

QUOTE(everyking @ Tue 13th January 2009, 4:58pm) *

It is simply ludicrous that people think they can solve problems like this. Yes, FT2 is obviously unfit to be an arbitrator, and arguably unfit to hold any position of responsibility on the site. But for Bishonen to swoop in and ban him based solely on her own say-so? It's just incredible to me that Wikipedia cannot grow out of such stupidity. FT2 is a long-standing contributor and any decision about blocking him should be based on the will of the community, not a single admin's say-so. Regardless of what happens to FT2, Bishonen (and/or her dinosaur alter-ego) should be desysopped.

I never would have expect to see you in the "longstanding contributors should be unaccountable for their actions" crowd, who seem to be the ones advocating this hogwash.


Accountable to the community. Not to Bishonen acting as an individual admin. Bishonen could propose action to the community, but it's unacceptable for her to make the judgment and carry out the sentence without any community deliberation.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirFozzie
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:42pm
Post #37


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 806
Joined: Thu 29th Mar 2007, 3:32pm
Member No.: 1,200

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Jimbo has already stated he's not going to act on this.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bottled_Spider
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:44pm
Post #38


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun 11th Jan 2009, 8:27pm
From: Pictland
Member No.: 9,708



QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Tue 13th January 2009, 10:17pm) *

QUOTE(written by he who wrote it @ Tue 13th January 2009, 5:09pm) *

My guess is that she hopes the heat of a massive dramafest will force him to either answer or bail.

I'm struggling to understand how she could think causing a huge dramafest is a positive result. What is her goal here?

Erm ........... She hopes the heat of a massive dramafest will force him to either answer or bail? No? Yes? Hello? Jesus.........

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
everyking
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:47pm
Post #39


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81



Durova's summary in the RfAr is excellent. She correctly observes that any action against FT2 should be taken after due deliberation and not on the say-so of a lone admin. She even points out Bishonen's inappropriate use of a joke account to carry out admin actions.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Tue 13th January 2009, 10:50pm
Post #40


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Tue 13th January 2009, 5:42pm) *
QUOTE(Dzonatas @ Tue 13th January 2009, 5:39pm) *
QUOTE(Black Kite @ Tue 13th January 2009, 2:30pm) *
QUOTE(Dzonatas @ Tue 13th January 2009, 10:19pm) *
I'm surprised the unblock hasn't been taken to ArbCom for the wheel-war bit.
Well, sort of
*gasp*
QUOTE
Statement by Jehochman

I suggest the entire matter be sent to Jimbo for sorting. The Committee is not competent to handle this matter, or they would have done so already. Jehochman Talk 22:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Jimbo has already stated he's not going to act on this.

This scenario is exemplary of what I call a Polionic System.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

27 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd 5 13, 6:28pm