Bishonen indef-blocks FT2, Holy crap, he hasn't been desysopped by Jimbo Options

[EricBarbour]

I've got a story for all you "animal husbands" out there......

[Cedric]

I've got a story for all you "animal husbands" out there......

Moral: NEVER mess with the "Grrbage Cru".

[Peter Damian]

See below. Who is the 'two faced editor in question ? I am assuming not me, as not aware of being nice to FT2 to his face. And who is 88.152.171.109?

I hate two faced people, so I'm letting you know certain editors here are saying unpleasant things about you over on wikipedia review based on some of your edits. I also know the editor in question hides their true views when talking to editors here. I won't, 'name names', just be aware some people who seem nice to your 'face' are pretty nasty really when talking about you. 88.152.171.109 (talk) 03:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&action=history

[LaraLove]

See below. Who is the 'two faced editor in question ? I am assuming not me, as not aware of being nice to FT2 to his face. And who is 88.152.171.109?

Looks like a dastardly dramamonger perpetuating the myth that WR is teh evils.

[dogbiscuit]

See below. Who is the 'two faced editor in question ? I am assuming not me, as not aware of being nice to FT2 to his face. And who is 88.152.171.109?

Looks like a dastardly dramamonger perpetuating the myth that WR is teh evils.

Actually, under Wikipedian logic, there is no rule against being two faced. If someone's actions on Wikipedia are friendly, then, as we do not need to know anything about them outside the WikiWorld, then they are friendly. It is by your actions on Wikipedia you are judged on Wikipedia.

Indeed, the IP should be blocked for breaking WP:AGF and WP:NPA (though a WikiLawyer would claim that as there is nobody named, it is not a "personal" attack). FT2 is quite capable of monitoring this readily findable thread, though he appears to have got bored of it so the IP should also be blocked for crass stupidity (translation WP:POINT).

[Bottled_Spider]

Who is the 'two faced editor in question ?

It's probably something to do with Batman. Expect to see appearances later from the Joker, the Penguin, and Arnie ("You won't put me in da coolah!)"

I am assuming not me, as not aware of being nice to FT2 to his face.

You're civil, though, by Wiki standards. Bear in mind that there's a lot of Wikipedo's who would, if given half the chance, scurrilously suggest that he'd shag a bush if he thought a sheep was in it, the pigs. So he could be meaning you, though I personally think he's referring to some (or all) of the Wiki admins who post here. He's probably got a point, mind you.

And who is 88.152.171.109?

Based in Germany, so that narrows it down considerably.

[wikiwhistle]

See below. Who is the 'two faced editor in question ? I am assuming not me, as not aware of being nice to FT2 to his face. And who is 88.152.171.109?

I hate two faced people, so I'm letting you know certain editors here are saying unpleasant things about you over on wikipedia review based on some of your edits. I also know the editor in question hides their true views when talking to editors here. I won't, 'name names', just be aware some people who seem nice to your 'face' are pretty nasty really when talking about you. 88.152.171.109 (talk) 03:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&action=history

FT has been over here quite recently anyway so he knows everyone's opinions. He was replying to us here, so nothing's not been said to his face. He knows how I feel about the bestialism (obviously, as he was actually talking to us about it for a bit) so I don't see how that's two faced as we actually have said it to him personally. That doesn't mean I'm entirely anti FT, he is quite fun to chat to sometimes. He knows everything we've said here (what with him having been here for most of the discussion ) And as far as I know he's still speaking to me.