SlimVirgin, Zeq, and Zero, Split from 'Tactics of the Master Baiters' Options

[The Adversary]

Apparently ms Hell cannot get into her head that one reason why she is so disliked is because she for many years protected some of the worst editors/harassers on WP. After IronDukes nasty baiting of Gnetwerker, she still tries to pass him off as a "popular and respected member of the community"

Another one WP-disaster/harasser she protected was User:Zeq; she unblocked him after he had published personal information on one of his opponents

Thank you very much. What does Zeq do next? Create articles (now both deleted) on two of his WP-adversaries; first, and second

So; here we have one nasty editor, who, with the help of ms. SV, is outing/harassing no less than 3 of his opponents on Wikipedia, but this is not enough to get him banned/blocked (Zeq was finally indef´d after the C.A.M.E.R.A. affair.)

[Heat]

Diff, as requested http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=251294011

Regarding your suggestion that people e-mail the blocking admin, my experience of ArbCom is that it's very hard to get them to reply to e-mails. For example, Kirill Lokshin indefblocked Proabivouac a few weeks ago. I e-mailed Kirill to ask in what circumstances he would agree to an unblock, and he simply ignored me. How should an admin proceed in a case like that, in your view? <font color="Brown">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small>^{<font color="darkgreen">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="Light green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|edits]]</font>}</small> 07:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

This post has been edited by Heat: Tue 28th April 2009, 8:28pm

[Milton Roe]

Diff, as requested http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=251294011

Regarding your suggestion that people e-mail the blocking admin, my experience of ArbCom is that it's very hard to get them to reply to e-mails. For example, Kirill Lokshin indefblocked Proabivouac a few weeks ago. I e-mailed Kirill to ask in what circumstances he would agree to an unblock, and he simply ignored me. How should an admin proceed in a case like that, in your view? <font color="Brown">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small>^{<font color="darkgreen">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="Light green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|edits]]</font>}</small> 07:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

If SlimVirgin doesn't know what to do in such a case, I doubt anybody does. Since she herself is justly famous for ignoring and even reverting people seeking explanations of her admin actions, on her own TALK page. Finally she managed to just delete the whole TALK page and archives, since it was a such a goldmine for people adding up instances in which she was less-than-helpful when it came to some administrative action of her own. Considerably irony above. Or hypocrisy appearing as irony, depending on your point of view.

[Cla68]

Diff, as requested http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=251294011

Regarding your suggestion that people e-mail the blocking admin, my experience of ArbCom is that it's very hard to get them to reply to e-mails. For example, Kirill Lokshin indefblocked Proabivouac a few weeks ago. I e-mailed Kirill to ask in what circumstances he would agree to an unblock, and he simply ignored me. How should an admin proceed in a case like that, in your view? <font color="Brown">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small>^{<font color="darkgreen">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="Light green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|edits]]</font>}</small> 07:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

If SlimVirgin doesn't know what to do in such a case, I doubt anybody does. Since she herself is justly famous for ignoring and even reverting people seeking explanations of her admin actions, on her own TALK page. Finally she managed to just delete the whole TALK page and archives, since it was a such a goldmine for people adding up instances in which she was less-than-helpful when it came to some administrative action of her own. Considerably irony above. Or hypocrisy appearing as irony, depending on your point of view.

Well, I'm not sure if that's fair. I looked into that and found the Crum375 deleted her user talk page to remove a vicous personal attack and accidentally deleted the entire history. I don't think he did it on purpose. The problem I have with it is that he doesn't appear to have tried very hard to fix it. I think a minimum of acceptable behavior would be for him to try to fix his own mess. Someone should have told him that until he restored it all that he wasn't allowed to do any other kind of editing.