another example. As SV presses Rootology to post his off-wiki communication about the advisory board, Rootology asks her about hers, and SV's response is that she communicated "briefly" with Jimbo, among others, with "none of it particularly meaningful."
Umm, SV, are we supposed to believe that you happened to email Jimbo to ask how he was doing and what he's been up to lately, and he responded with something like, "Fine! how have you been?" I think, perhaps, that instead you wrote him a strident note of protest over his support for the advisory council and he responded by blowing you off, which of course would be "not particularly meaningful" in your book, but which would be significant for other interested parties since it would show that Jimbo had no interest in your opinion on this particular topic.
SV, if you don't want to have a reputation for being dishonest, then don't be. If you don't care, well then, by all means feel free to continue to behave this way.This post has been edited by Cla68: Fri 17th July 2009, 10:04pm