The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Getting on the Wikimedia Board
GlassBeadGame
post Sun 30th August 2009, 4:43am
Post #41


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981



QUOTE(Somey @ Sat 29th August 2009, 9:53pm) *


Priceless.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tarantino
post Sun 30th August 2009, 5:07am
Post #42


the Dude abides
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,439
Joined: Mon 30th Jul 2007, 11:41pm
Member No.: 2,143



QUOTE(Somey @ Sun 30th August 2009, 3:53am) *

Obviously $2 million is chicken feed to someone who's worth as much as Omidyar ...


Yeah, and also compared to the $12.5 million that the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundations just gave to the Encyclopedia of Life, a collaborative project that's goal is to describe all known species.

This post has been edited by tarantino: Sun 30th August 2009, 5:09am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Nerd
post Sun 30th August 2009, 1:20pm
Post #43


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 672
Joined: Sat 30th May 2009, 7:52pm
From: Cloud cuckoo land
Member No.: 11,945



QUOTE(Somey @ Sun 30th August 2009, 4:53am) *

Obviously $2 million is chicken feed to someone who's worth as much as Omidyar, but still, for that much money you'd think they could at least protect his BLP article...


That would cause an uproar.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Mon 31st August 2009, 7:15pm
Post #44


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



Akahele: Omidyar venturing out
-- by Gregory Kohs

If you publicly announce (on the same day) a $2 million grant and the award of a board of trustees seat, people will assume that the seat was “bought” by the money-granting organization. No matter how well (or how poorly) you communicate the transaction, there will be skeptics. Gregory Kohs examines how the Omidyar Network obtained a seat on the Wikimedia Foundation board.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Mon 31st August 2009, 9:26pm
Post #45


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Nerd @ Sun 30th August 2009, 6:20am) *

QUOTE(Somey @ Sun 30th August 2009, 4:53am) *

Obviously $2 million is chicken feed to someone who's worth as much as Omidyar, but still, for that much money you'd think they could at least protect his BLP article...


That would cause an uproar.

It will cause an uproar, but WMF does not care. Do you think they care that Jimbo's BLP is buffed and polished and Doran's is missing? No. They label this as a "privacy" issue, as though didn't cover a whole multitude of sins. Everybody has privacy. And if yours is protected better than somebody else's, it means you can get away with just about anything more easily.

Nobody will be able to add anything false and scandalous to Omidyar's BLP, for quite some time. Depend on it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GlassBeadGame
post Mon 31st August 2009, 9:46pm
Post #46


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981



Wikipedia acting in a socially responsible maneer, as opposed to relying on immunity and the free content that anyone, regardless of motive or quality provides, will take significant resources. A broke WMF will always be an irresponsible entity. A WMF that relies exclusively on individual donations from a techie libertarian base will always be irresponsible. It will especially take administrative capacity and staff to assure editorial standards and not just some invisible hand nonsense. Omidyar beleives he has something to offer in these areas. I think he is laboring under many false assumptions based on "market fetish" type of economics. But I'm not saying that market devices have nothing to offer. I hope that Omidyar makes them take a hard look at developing responsibility and if market devices don't provide the answers I hope he will be pragmatic enough to look at other approaches too. In any event financial resources provided by givers invested in the reputation of the organization, not a bunch of nameless small givers, will be needed to even begin down the path toward responsibility.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dtobias
post Mon 31st August 2009, 10:31pm
Post #47


Obsessive trolling idiot [per JzG]
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,213
Joined: Sun 11th Feb 2007, 2:45pm
From: Boca Raton, FL, USA
Member No.: 962

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 25th August 2009, 2:06pm) *

might bring libertarian ethos with them.


...and you wouldn't want something so unspeakably horrible! Perish the thought!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Fri 11th September 2009, 1:38pm
Post #48


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



It seems that one Austrian is not willing to perceive Omidyar Network in the light that Omidyar would wish him to perceive them.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Mon 28th December 2009, 7:41pm
Post #49


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



One thing is clear... $2 million buys Halprin unanimous support for an additional year on the Board.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
CharlotteWebb
post Mon 28th December 2009, 8:24pm
Post #50


Postmaster General
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,740
Joined: Mon 18th Jun 2007, 2:09am
Member No.: 1,727

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Mon 28th December 2009, 7:41pm) *

One thing is clear... $2 million buys Halprin unanimous support for an additional year on the Board.

Things could be worse. See, I clicked on that and immediately confused Matt Halprin with Mark Helprin. jawdrop.gif

Thus began 30 seconds of explosive brainfuck.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Mon 27th June 2011, 6:35pm
Post #51


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



I don't know how we missed this big employment shift (since his every move is a generator of headline news), but apparently since October 2010, Matt Halprin is no longer with:
  • Goodmail Systems (board)
  • Sunlight Foundation (board)
  • DonorsChoose.org (board)
  • Omidyar Network (partner)

Looks like he's given all of those up to go take up the role of EVP, Strategy & Corporate Development, for Ning. A year ago, Ning was about the 120th most popular website, and now it's about 270th.

Is that a good move or a bad move for Mr. Halprin?

He's sticking it out on the Wikimedia Foundation board, for some reason.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 5 13, 11:17pm