The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

12 Pages V  1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Benjiboi, and his 2 autobiographies
Rating  3
tarantino
post Sat 5th September 2009, 1:02am
Post #1


the Dude abides
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,440
Joined: Mon 30th Jul 2007, 11:41pm
Member No.: 2,143



Not many editors have their own autobiography, Benji is perhaps the only one to have two.

His DJ Pusspuss persona is a self-described American club, mobile and event DJ, music reviewer, activist and event producer.

While Sister Kitty Catalyst O.C.P., is a self-described uber-nun and homo-propagandist.

He is also mostly responsible for Sisters_of_Perpetual_Indulgence (T-H-L-K-D), a non-profit organization he works for, and the bios of several of his fellow nuns.

Concerns about an undisclosed conflict of interest and unlabeled autobiographies have been brought up a couple of times on wiki before, in 2007 and 2008. They were brushed aside by Benji and a small group of his enablers. There is very little doubt it is all true though.

(thanks to an anonymous tipster)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Sat 5th September 2009, 1:15am
Post #2


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



And the point is...? bored.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JayT
post Sat 5th September 2009, 1:33am
Post #3


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat 30th Aug 2008, 12:58am
Member No.: 7,991



QUOTE(tarantino @ Fri 4th September 2009, 7:02pm) *

Not many editors have their own autobiography, Benji is perhaps the only one to have two.

His DJ Pusspuss persona is a self-described American club, mobile and event DJ, music reviewer, activist and event producer.

While Sister Kitty Catalyst O.C.P., is a self-described uber-nun and homo-propagandist.

He is also mostly responsible for Sisters_of_Perpetual_Indulgence (T-H-L-K-D), a non-profit organization he works for, and the bios of several of his fellow nuns.

Concerns about an undisclosed conflict of interest and unlabeled autobiographies have been brought up a couple of times on wiki before, in 2007 and 2008. They were brushed aside by Benji and a small group of his enablers. There is very little doubt it is all true though.

(thanks to an anonymous tipster)

I take it this hasn't been acknowledged on wikipedia? Not that I'm doubting you, but is there proof that could be used to show that the articles are vanity pages?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Sat 5th September 2009, 1:58am
Post #4


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(tarantino @ Fri 4th September 2009, 9:02pm) *

Not many editors have their own autobiography, Benji is perhaps the only one to have two.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wik...s_with_articles
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tarantino
post Sat 5th September 2009, 2:09am
Post #5


the Dude abides
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,440
Joined: Mon 30th Jul 2007, 11:41pm
Member No.: 2,143



QUOTE(JayT @ Sat 5th September 2009, 1:33am) *

I take it this hasn't been acknowledged on wikipedia? Not that I'm doubting you, but is there proof that could be used to show that the articles are vanity pages?


No and yes. Someone will bring it up onwiki eventually, because everyone who's anyone there reads WR.

Edit: Here's a statement from Sister Iona Dubble-Wyde:
QUOTE

Benjiboi has made 226 of the 694 non-bot edits to the article.

This post has been edited by tarantino: Sat 5th September 2009, 3:32am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
One
post Sat 5th September 2009, 2:10am
Post #6


Postmaster General
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,553
Joined: Tue 25th Dec 2007, 10:49am
Member No.: 4,284

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(JayT @ Sat 5th September 2009, 1:33am) *

I take it this hasn't been acknowledged on wikipedia? Not that I'm doubting you, but is there proof that could be used to show that the articles are vanity pages?

Hard to say. See DJ_Pusspuss AfD.

This post has been edited by One: Sat 5th September 2009, 2:13am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gomi
post Sat 5th September 2009, 2:45am
Post #7


Member
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,022
Joined: Fri 17th Nov 2006, 6:38pm
Member No.: 565



QUOTE(tarantino @ Fri 4th September 2009, 7:09pm) *
QUOTE(JayT @ Sat 5th September 2009, 1:33am) *
I take it this hasn't been acknowledged on wikipedia?
Someone will bring it up onwiki eventually, because everyone who's anyone there reads WR.


Ding ding ding! We have a winner:

QUOTE(One @ Fri 4th September 2009, 7:10pm) *
Hard to say.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Sat 5th September 2009, 3:31am
Post #8


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



Just so I have this clear...

One of Wikipedia's leading editors is also a notable DJ spinning tunes for "t-girl" strippers?

No wonder Wikipedia is "almost" as reliable as Encyclopedia Britannica.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alison
post Sat 5th September 2009, 4:22am
Post #9


Skinny Cow!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,514
Joined: Tue 26th Jun 2007, 8:08pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 1,806



QUOTE(tarantino @ Fri 4th September 2009, 7:09pm) *

QUOTE(JayT @ Sat 5th September 2009, 1:33am) *

I take it this hasn't been acknowledged on wikipedia? Not that I'm doubting you, but is there proof that could be used to show that the articles are vanity pages?


No and yes. Someone will bring it up onwiki eventually, because everyone who's anyone there reads WR.

Edit: Here's a statement from Sister Iona Dubble-Wyde:
QUOTE

Benjiboi has made 226 of the 694 non-bot edits to the article.

*coff* hmmm.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
No one of consequence
post Sat 5th September 2009, 4:26am
Post #10


I want to stare at the seaside and do nothing at all
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 635
Joined: Fri 23rd Feb 2007, 2:34am
Member No.: 1,010

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(JayT @ Sat 5th September 2009, 1:33am) *

QUOTE(tarantino @ Fri 4th September 2009, 7:02pm) *

Not many editors have their own autobiography, Benji is perhaps the only one to have two.

I take it this hasn't been acknowledged on wikipedia? Not that I'm doubting you, but is there proof that could be used to show that the articles are vanity pages?

I got the same tip but I don't have time to personally investigate. Maybe One or SirFozzie or FT2 has time on his hands.

QUOTE(Alison @ Sat 5th September 2009, 4:22am) *

Alison wins the kewpie doll!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Sat 5th September 2009, 7:26am
Post #11


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



B has an interesting view of what constitutes a personal attack (in this case an objective look at one of Haiduc's strange articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_pederastic_couples). See below. The problem is that it is difficult to complain about any of this stuff (namely overt propagandising) without being accused of homophobia.

QUOTE

Actually combined with Peter Damian's history of calling other editors something akin to pro-pedophile activists and accusing admins of protecting the same I wanted to be quite firm that veiled accusations like calling the article Haiduc's thesis and stating things such as "acres of original research that Haiduc insists on propogating in Wikipedia" on the talkpage of [[Historical pederastic couples]] is seen as unhelpful, disruptive and uncivil. Adding that to Peter Damian's comment at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 July 20#Historical pederastic couples]] - "Everything Haiduc writes is plagued by fallacy of equivocation and similar logical deficiencies." Seems to be a personal attack of some sort. I also see this as possibly violating assuming good faith policy. To me this is an editor whose not showing a polite discourse but flouting the disposition to let bad faith accusations and personal attacks against certain editors stand unchallenged. Wikipedia is not a battleground and an atmosphere of harassment and intimidation should not be encouraged. I also am readily able, as is any editor, to file reports at ANI or another appropriate board if Peter Damian's behavior doesn't come into an acceptable level. Just because some admins have been allowed to abuse tools or fling mud at Haiduc and other editors doesn't mean we all roll over and take punches and personal attacks. We need to support editors not an atmosphere of intolerance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=227111408


See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Art...2nd_nomination)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Sat 5th September 2009, 8:09am
Post #12


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(No one of consequence @ Sat 5th September 2009, 5:26am) *

I got the same tip but I don't have time to personally investigate.


Are they the same person? Benjiboi wrote the entire article about "DJ Pusspuss". And here it says they are the same person

"DJ Puss Puss is also Sister Kitty Catalyst of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence."
http://www.mail-archive.com/squidlist@list...g/msg03608.html

But DJ Pusspuss is clearly mid-twenties, whereas sister kitty is older. Her biography says that s/he "came to San Francisco via the London Order that I had joined (1991-92)" which means age about late thirties

http://www.thesisters.org/bios/kitty.html

However her email is "pusspuss at gotblow dot org". Now http://www.gotblow.org/ is "a grassroots campaign using a safety whistle as a symbol to confront hate crimes", which sister kitty co-founded per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sister_Kitty_Catalyst_O.C.P.. .

This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Sat 5th September 2009, 9:09am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Sat 5th September 2009, 9:54am
Post #13


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(No one of consequence @ Sat 5th September 2009, 12:26am) *

I got the same tip but I don't have time to personally investigate. Maybe One or SirFozzie or FT2 has time on his hands.


Funny, someone is sending "tips" that out Benji? It appears more than a few people have time on their hands! dry.gif

QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 4th September 2009, 11:31pm) *

One of Wikipedia's leading editors is also a notable DJ spinning tunes for "t-girl" strippers?

No wonder Wikipedia is "almost" as reliable as Encyclopedia Britannica.


Benji is a "leading" editor? That's news to me. blink.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Sat 5th September 2009, 10:12am
Post #14


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Sat 5th September 2009, 10:54am) *

It appears more than a few people have time on their hands! dry.gif


If anything bad or embarrassing turns up it is always helpful to say something like this. Another good reply (often used by Thatcher) is that it happened some time ago (Thatcher has never really specified exactly how long counts).

If anyone subsequently lies about it http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=182144567 , then say that politicians often lie.

Or get a mate to make allegations of stalking or harrassment

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=182177247

This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Sat 5th September 2009, 10:15am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Sat 5th September 2009, 1:20pm
Post #15


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Oh I see someone called 'The Land Surveyor' has put the article on the DJ up for deletion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Art...2nd_nomination)

Will it be deleted? Or will the person who put it up for deletion be blocked or be the target of abuse for supposed harrassment, wikistalking, BADSITES or whatever else? Let's see.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carbuncle
post Sat 5th September 2009, 2:25pm
Post #16


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,601
Joined: Sun 30th Mar 2008, 4:48pm
Member No.: 5,544



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sat 5th September 2009, 1:20pm) *

Oh I see someone called 'The Land Surveyor' has put the article on the DJ up for deletion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Art...2nd_nomination)

Will it be deleted? Or will the person who put it up for deletion be blocked or be the target of abuse for supposed harrassment, wikistalking, BADSITES or whatever else? Let's see.

I wonder if this AFD will bring the esteemed LGBT editor and fellow self-promoter Allstarecho out of his retirement (and by retirement I mean leaving in a huff as the ban hammer starts getting warmed up)?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Sat 5th September 2009, 2:52pm
Post #17


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



I suspect the whistleblowing may have come from the ranks of the users involved in the paid editing article dispute

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Paid_editing
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Sat 5th September 2009, 6:10pm
Post #18


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(carbuncle @ Sat 5th September 2009, 10:25am) *

I wonder if this AFD will bring the esteemed LGBT editor and fellow self-promoter Allstarecho out of his retirement (and by retirement I mean leaving in a huff as the ban hammer starts getting warmed up)?


Only if Matt Sanchez shows up. evilgrin.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Sat 5th September 2009, 9:35pm
Post #19


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



All is explained.

QUOTE
Week keep. Since I last went through and added sources I have been unable to find the radio interviews that were online previously. I'll leave it for others to decide if this meets GNG with what we have. With Fences and windows' excellent detective work seems they co-founded several organizations. There were several two-hour interviews that certainly were independent although they were hardly hard news. They were, BTW, with the same person being used to source the connection but nothing in the interviews addressed any connection or identity besides the DJ one but was helpful to add in some biographical and early life content. Despite Fences and windows' excellent detective work I don't see any sourcing to back up a merge. There is only one unreliable source - an entry on livejournal.com no less - making the assertion but looking through their other entries they seem to make mistakes. There is also the possibility we have two people sharing one email account and by extension, likely live together and work on projects together. -- Banjeboi 21:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


[edit] And indeed the Land Surveyor has been blocked.


QUOTE

Blocked
You know the rules and so do I. Brandon (talk) 20:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

The rules, as far as I am concerned, are that abuse of accounts is wrong. Here we have a case of a person writing not one, but two articles about themselves. You notice I was discreet enough not to point out the identity on the AfD page. The Land Surveyor (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:The_Land_Surveyor"


This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Sat 5th September 2009, 9:47pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Sun 6th September 2009, 12:37am
Post #20


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sat 5th September 2009, 4:35pm) *
[edit] And indeed the Land Surveyor has been blocked.


QUOTE

Blocked
You know the rules and so do I. Brandon (talk) 20:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

The rules, as far as I am concerned, are that abuse of accounts is wrong. Here we have a case of a person writing not one, but two articles about themselves. You notice I was discreet enough not to point out the identity on the AfD page. The Land Surveyor (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:The_Land_Surveyor"



Phooey...Horsey wants knockdown, dragout, WWE violence. This stuff is boring. hrmph.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

12 Pages V  1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd 10 17, 9:46am