Fundamental reform of Wikipedia, ideas wanted Options

[Peter Damian]

Wales gives you complete charge, and you have three fundamental reforms that you are allowed to implement.

What would those be? And what are the problems or abuses that each are supposed to address?

This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Sat 12th September 2009, 12:04pm

[The Wales Hunter]

Why would anyone listen to what this vile monster has to say about "reform?"

Because if the Devil told you your zipper was undone, you'd still check?

This post has been edited by The Wales Hunter: Sat 12th September 2009, 9:02pm

[GlassBeadGame]

Why would anyone listen to what this vile monster has to say about "reform?"

Because if the Devil told you your zipper was undone, you'd still check?

She's only joining the discussion to manipulate. By the way all (except my own) sets of "fundamental reforms" are basically on the level of improving a junior high school pep club. So much for "fundamental."

[LessHorrid vanU]

Why would anyone listen to what this vile monster has to say about "reform?"

Because if the Devil told you your zipper was undone, you'd still check?

She's only joining the discussion to manipulate. By the way all (except my own) sets of "fundamental reforms" are basically on the level of improving a junior high school pep club. So much for "fundamental."

Everyone else took the view that the requirement was the implementing of reform to the existing structure - rather than tearing that down and starting from scratch. I saw PD's starter as "How do you change the existing editorship into making a better encyclopedia", as I suppose did most people.