JzG, same old same old, Repeats old claims Options

[Abd]

Removes convenience copy of paper

JzG made this copyright argument over and over before, and edit warred over inclusion of sources from lenr-canr.org. The whole issue was debated ad nauseum at the WP whitelist page, and the link he removed was whitelisted specifically for usage, on consideration of the copyright arguments. There is no legal risk whatever to Wikipedia for this link, because lenr-canr.org does claim permission, and is not obligated to provide us with specific evidence for every one of their thousands of pages.

Lenr-canr.org is highly visible in the field, and if the publisher doesn't want the page offered, it can request it be taken down, and it's highly likely that they would do so. Wikipedia should not link to known copyright violations, but JzG's claim does not establish that, and he's just repeating the old arguments he made before, that were rejected; he thinks he can get away with it now that I'm blocked. Maybe he will, but I rather doubt it.

JzG also nominated for deletion my "Cabal" evidence page for RfAr/Abd-William M. Connolley. Watch him, folks, he'll do what he thinks he can get away with, and more.

[gomi]

When will you Wikipidiots get through your thick, numb skulls that encyclopedias should be full of settled science, and settled history, and biographies of long-dead people, and basically the safe and sane middle of the knowledge space? If you want to go on about Cold Fusion or Animal Rights or Chronic Epstein-Barr Virus Syndrome or crap like that, go start your own website, or read science journals or something else. This is why Wikipedia is a pile of crap -- it's a billboard for every loony tune with an axe to grind, whether it is labeling historical figures anti-semitic or crusading against (or for) abortion or Irish nationalism. Get a grip! Arghh!

[Cock-up-over-conspiracy]

When will you Wikipidiots get through your thick, numb skulls that encyclopedias should be full of settled science, and settled history, and biographies of long-dead people, and basically the safe and sane middle of the knowledge space?

But I heard that the Cold Fusion topic is going to help the starving young girl in Africa ... for whom the Wikipedia is really for according to Jimbo ... save the world with its entire sum of all the knowledge in the world about it !!! (Except how to actually do it reproducibly, of course).

I know nothing about the science of cold fusion but the sociology of the science of cold fusion certainly was interesting and valid enough in its own right. Citable papers et al.

The hullabaloo is nothing new. They same old fart bags have been going at it in basically the same social dynamics since ... oh, at least Bessler's Wheel. And probably event before. Cro-magnons arguing that 'evry ful knos' a tree could not roll up a hill even after they invented the wheel.

But then that would just be more pseudoreviewia too ...

Can the admins split and merge the cold fusion stuff? We seem to have lost JzG somewhere in the calorimeter.