The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Editing to help a friend's gin mill
victim of censorship
post Wed 28th October 2009, 12:08am
Post #1


Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,148
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640



For the sake of fairness and bringing a little light of day, (Mr. KOSHER will like this) I will point out this little drama, developing, at this place in the Wacky world of wiki, how a protected editor Goethean with the help of his little buddy admin Gamaliel can help a friend profit from Wikipedia. This may be fun.

The problem though, and maybe MR (Kolls) can assist me, is to pursue an AfD to get rid of this "green brew" article about Two Brothers Brewing. Two Brothers Brewing may not be easy to do, since the nuts and bolts of wikilaw is not my specialty.


Any rate, practical, absolute proof, that wikipeidians are bold face hypocrites, even on matters of breer. Watch the show. It's worth the sock in the garbage disposal.

This post has been edited by victim of censorship: Wed 28th October 2009, 12:24am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Wed 28th October 2009, 2:43am
Post #2


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Tue 27th October 2009, 8:08pm) *

For the sake of fairness and bringing a little light of day, (Mr. KOSHER will like this) I will point out this little drama, developing, at this place in the Wacky world of wiki, how a protected editor Goethean with the help of his little buddy admin Gamaliel can help a friend profit from Wikipedia. This may be fun.

The problem though, and maybe MR (Kolls) can assist me, is to pursue an AfD to get rid of this "green brew" article about Two Brothers Brewing. Two Brothers Brewing may not be easy to do, since the nuts and bolts of wikilaw is not my specialty.


Any rate, practical, absolute proof, that wikipeidians are bold face hypocrites, even on matters of breer. Watch the show. It's worth the sock in the garbage disposal.


I've written maybe half a dozen such articles in exchange for payment with about equal notability and "reliable sources". It would be a bit hypocritical of me to advocate for this one's removal, wouldn't it?

Good misspelling of my name and nickname -- twice -- in the same post, though. That brought a chuckle.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
victim of censorship
post Wed 28th October 2009, 3:19am
Post #3


Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,148
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640



QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 28th October 2009, 2:43am) *

QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Tue 27th October 2009, 8:08pm) *

For the sake of fairness and bringing a little light of day, (Mr. KOSHER will like this) I will point out this little drama, developing, at this place in the Wacky world of wiki, how a protected editor Goethean with the help of his little buddy admin Gamaliel can help a friend profit from Wikipedia. This may be fun.

The problem though, and maybe MR (Kolls) can assist me, is to pursue an AfD to get rid of this "green brew" article about Two Brothers Brewing. Two Brothers Brewing may not be easy to do, since the nuts and bolts of wikilaw is not my specialty.


Any rate, practical, absolute proof, that wikipeidians are bold face hypocrites, even on matters of breer. Watch the show. It's worth the sock in the garbage disposal.


I've written maybe half a dozen such articles in exchange for payment with about equal notability and "reliable sources". It would be a bit hypocritical of me to advocate for this one's removal, wouldn't it?

Good misspelling of my name and nickname -- twice -- in the same post, though. That brought a chuckle.


Well, the problem is, they (Wiki) shit canned you for it... now the point I'm making is what is good for you is good for Mr. Scott (Goethean).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Wed 28th October 2009, 3:42am
Post #4


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



Which will just drive them underground, as I was driven underground, free to make money the old-fashioned way... in secret.

It's actually easier to keep tabs on them as is, in the light of disclosure. Advocate for a critical review of their nastiest-tasting beer in a reliable source, then plaster that right smack dab in the Wikipedia article. Then you're using Wikipedia the way it was designed to be -- a big defamation platform.

Have fun!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
victim of censorship
post Wed 28th October 2009, 4:19am
Post #5


Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,148
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640



QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 28th October 2009, 3:42am) *

Which will just drive them underground, as I was driven underground, free to make money the old-fashioned way... in secret.

It's actually easier to keep tabs on them as is, in the light of disclosure. Advocate for a critical review of their nastiest-tasting beer in a reliable source, then plaster that right smack dab in the Wikipedia article. Then you're using Wikipedia the way it was designed to be -- a big defamation platform.

Have fun!


I'm Polish, which means I'm sometimes to stubborn for my own good... But, You point is good... Unfortunately, it's not really that bad of a place, only small and not really notable.

The reason is MR Scott Z ( see his blog here) is rather a very nasty little hate monger A more recent example of the guy's aggressiveness ( he hates Christianity) and any one who thinks Willberism is not the last word in philosophy, as well as he absolutely hates Republicans with a pathological zeal, only reserved for mass murders and bad card dealers. Some of Goethean's sites

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Wed 28th October 2009, 12:59pm
Post #6


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



I imagine nasty tasting beer would not be kosher.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
victim of censorship
post Sun 1st November 2009, 2:48pm
Post #7


Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,148
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640



QUOTE(Moulton @ Wed 28th October 2009, 12:59pm) *

I imagine nasty tasting beer would not be kosher.


And the wiki Lie sausage grinds on.

In looking at this Two bothers Brew
And here

It's clear Wikipedia policy is not important, only in so much as it selectively applied, as it suits the gang.

You can see the hypocrisy and thuggery of Wikipedia, even in beer.

This is why Wikipedia is a Lake of Shit, and should never be trusted. Even beer, on wiki taste like shit.

This post has been edited by victim of censorship: Sun 1st November 2009, 2:57pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
victim of censorship
post Sun 1st November 2009, 3:10pm
Post #8


Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,148
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640



QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Sun 1st November 2009, 2:48pm) *

QUOTE(Moulton @ Wed 28th October 2009, 12:59pm) *

I imagine nasty tasting beer would not be kosher.


And the wiki Lie sausage grinds on.

In looking at this Two bothers Brew
And here

It's clear Wikipedia policy is not important, only in so much as it selectively applied, as it suits the gang.

You can see the hypocrisy and thuggery of Wikipedia, even in beer.

This is why Wikipedia is a Lake of Shit, and should never be trusted. Even beer, on wiki taste like shit.


If wikpedia is like beer what kind of beer would it be... piss filtered though dog shit?

Image

A happy wiki customer... who sez wiki admins don't drink th'er own piss?

This post has been edited by victim of censorship: Sun 1st November 2009, 3:39pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Joy
post Sun 1st November 2009, 7:35pm
Post #9


I am a millipede! I am amazing!
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,838
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 2:25am
From: The Moon
Member No.: 982



QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Sun 1st November 2009, 9:48am) *

QUOTE(Moulton @ Wed 28th October 2009, 12:59pm) *

I imagine nasty tasting beer would not be kosher.

This is why Wikipedia is a Lake of Shit, and should never be trusted. Even beer, on wiki taste like shit.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
CharlotteWebb
post Sun 1st November 2009, 7:50pm
Post #10


Postmaster General
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,740
Joined: Mon 18th Jun 2007, 2:09am
Member No.: 1,727

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Well at least that guy has a paddle of sorts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
victim of censorship
post Sun 1st November 2009, 9:57pm
Post #11


Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,148
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640



QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Sun 1st November 2009, 7:50pm) *

Well at least that guy has a paddle of sorts.



...And a boat that don't leak.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
victim of censorship
post Wed 4th November 2009, 5:16am
Post #12


Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,148
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640



Looks like the Goethean thug gets his way on his paid brewhouse article.

Rules, you don't need any stinking rules, just a good gang.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th 10 14, 5:05am