QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Thu 10th December 2009, 12:01pm)
The beer nut Goethean (T-C-L-K-R-D)
has made a new sock... Joeperez69 (T-C-L-K-R-D)
Proof, the writing style of the two users, as well as the same subject matter of interest and pov expressed by the two users account owners.
There's a general similarity, but I don't think it's the same person. "Joe Perez" originally made this AnonIP edit
and then started an account... He has a fairly extensive website
, and a blog
in which he reveals himself to be a gay writer, all with photos and so on. Also a consulting firm
, which may not be all that successful or even legitimate, but regardless it's not likely to be Goethean
's - the site claims it's based in Seattle, and the AnonIP's address geolocates to Seattle.
Moreover, if you read the text of that diff, you'll see that he doesn't completely agree with Goethean
on what the basic approach should be - Goethean
is clearly a follower, whereas Joe Perez seems to be slightly less biased:
I have not read the article recently or thoroughly enough to produce a comprehensive list of bias issues. However, two that come to mind as immediately problematic are the use of "Wilberian" and "post-Wilberian" to describe various thinkers. I am not aware of any credible, independent source that is *not* a weblog that has ever used either of these terms.
I don't think Goethean
would have written that - he's unquestioningly faithful to Wilber and the idea that Wilber is a major force in modern philosophy, whose bona fides are not to be doubted.