The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> How effective is checkuser?
Ather
post Thu 31st December 2009, 1:16pm
Post #1


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue 30th Sep 2008, 4:51pm
Member No.: 8,508



If I wanted to run several accounts how likely is checkuser to pick me up? If I changed my IP each time I logged on how would they trap me? How long to they log IP addresses for? Do they keep a permanent record of my account creation IP? Do they record me logging on but not editing? What other info do they store and for how long? All this info is needed purely for research purposes tongue.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
gomi
post Thu 31st December 2009, 5:20pm
Post #2


Member
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,022
Joined: Fri 17th Nov 2006, 6:38pm
Member No.: 565



This site shows you in a readable way what your browser string and other "checkuser" information looks like. It leaves out one string, "referrer", which is what page you came from, which CU also includes, and a few HTTP headers like XFF (forwarded-for, which identifies proxies). Here is one that shows all the headers, but doesn't break out the browser string pieces. There are a million of these around the web.

This page documents the interface adequately.

The only open question is whether they retain the user creation IP forever. I think they do, but don't have any proof in the code, because I can't be bothered to go look at it.

Note also that nothing in Wikipedia's checkuser data retention policy will help you if a CU wants to salt away results in a file on his or her computer for months or years. Other than that, it would appear that CU data on en.wp is retained for 90-120 days.

There are Firefox add-ons for changing your browser string and your referrer. If you're going to sock, then use them.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Thu 31st December 2009, 7:17pm
Post #3


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(gomi @ Thu 31st December 2009, 5:20pm) *


The only open question is whether they retain the user creation IP forever. I think they do, but don't have any proof in the code, because I can't be bothered to go look at it.


This is the question, which has been raised a number of times in this thread.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
anthony
post Thu 31st December 2009, 7:28pm
Post #4


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,034
Joined: Mon 30th Jul 2007, 1:31am
Member No.: 2,132



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Thu 31st December 2009, 7:17pm) *

QUOTE(gomi @ Thu 31st December 2009, 5:20pm) *


The only open question is whether they retain the user creation IP forever. I think they do, but don't have any proof in the code, because I can't be bothered to go look at it.


This is the question, which has been raised a number of times in this thread.


Really? Where's the database schema? I'm pretty sure there's a field there for exactly that piece of information (*).

There are plenty of other open questions, though. For one thing, checkuser isn't the the only place IP addresses are stored. They're also in the server logs, and last time I checked the privacy policy was ambiguous about how long those are kept (and, in fact, a request to clarify it was met with something to the effect of "we don't want to help miscreants by releasing that information").

Also, even if they don't retain IP addresses automatically, checkusers still have the ability to retain them privately.

In the end, I think it's safer to just assume that your IP address is known.

(*) Hmm, it doesn't look like it is. Now that I think about it I thought it was in the logs somewhere, but I don't see it there either. I guess it's stored in cu_changes. Not sure when it's deleted from there.

This post has been edited by anthony: Thu 31st December 2009, 8:45pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
anthony
post Thu 31st December 2009, 7:49pm
Post #5


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,034
Joined: Mon 30th Jul 2007, 1:31am
Member No.: 2,132



QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Thu 31st December 2009, 7:44pm) *

QUOTE(anthony @ Thu 31st December 2009, 2:28pm) *

Really? Where's the database schema? I'm pretty sure there's a field there for exactly that piece of information.

The database schema is here, I think.


The last time I looked at it before today, it was in recent_changes. But that was relatively a long time ago, at least in Internet time. It has changed much since then.

This post has been edited by anthony: Thu 31st December 2009, 7:50pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Ather   How effective is checkuser?   Thu 31st December 2009, 1:16pm
anthony   If I wanted to run several accounts how likely is...   Thu 31st December 2009, 1:31pm
Krimpet   I wouldn't count on any information you recei...   Thu 31st December 2009, 1:58pm
Premier player   I wouldn't count on any information you recei...   Tue 5th January 2010, 12:54pm
Peter Damian   If I wanted to run several accounts how likely is...   Thu 31st December 2009, 2:28pm
dogbiscuit   I looked at some of this code and it is pretty im...   Thu 31st December 2009, 2:39pm
Herschelkrustofsky   Keep in mind that checkuser is frequently used to ...   Thu 31st December 2009, 3:05pm
White Knight   Keep in mind that checkuser is frequently used to...   Mon 4th January 2010, 3:46pm
Kelly Martin   It's my understanding that checkuser now also ...   Thu 31st December 2009, 4:47pm
dogbiscuit   It's my understanding that checkuser now also...   Thu 31st December 2009, 5:12pm
Krimpet   It's my understanding that checkuser now also...   Thu 31st December 2009, 5:34pm
gomi   ... since the technical know-how to read and inter...   Thu 31st December 2009, 5:36pm
Krimpet   [quote name='Krimpet' post='212801' date='Thu 31s...   Thu 31st December 2009, 5:40pm
anthony   For some reason Wikipedians get hyper-excited ab...   Thu 31st December 2009, 6:06pm
Krimpet   I can understand why they got rid of the feature ...   Thu 31st December 2009, 9:12pm
anthony   [quote name='anthony' post='212807' date='Thu 31s...   Thu 31st December 2009, 9:59pm
Ather   By the way, what's your license plate number...   Thu 31st December 2009, 10:13pm
CharlotteWebb   User-agent identification has been there for a pr...   Thu 31st December 2009, 8:42pm
gomi   This site shows you in a readable way what your br...   Thu 31st December 2009, 5:20pm
MZMcBride   Really? Where's the database schema? I...   Thu 31st December 2009, 7:44pm
anthony   Really? Where's the database schema? I...   Thu 31st December 2009, 7:49pm
MBisanz   [quote name='MZMcBride' post='212818' date='Thu 3...   Thu 31st December 2009, 8:31pm
Cock-up-over-conspiracy   There are Firefox add-ons for changing your browse...   Fri 1st January 2010, 3:18am
taiwopanfob   e) keep copies of data for far longer than 3 month...   Fri 1st January 2010, 3:13pm
No one of consequence   e) keep copies of data for far longer than 3 mont...   Mon 4th January 2010, 12:48pm
Cock-up-over-conspiracy   The retention limit is indeed philosophical rather...   Mon 4th January 2010, 4:22pm
Limey   If I wanted to run several accounts how likely is...   Thu 31st December 2009, 6:02pm
Jon Awbrey   The only thing you need to know about Checkuser is...   Thu 31st December 2009, 6:18pm
MZMcBride   I wrote a guide to socking, but it was deleted fro...   Thu 31st December 2009, 6:42pm
Ather   Hey guys, thanks for all the good advice. Some of ...   Thu 31st December 2009, 7:38pm
Peter Damian   I always take the opportunity to create a new soc...   Fri 1st January 2010, 2:33pm
Limey   Another quick thought - might a long lag time be...   Thu 31st December 2009, 8:20pm
Lar   It's not very effective at all.   Thu 31st December 2009, 9:19pm
Text   Poetlister, Mantanmoreland, and whoever else Th...   Fri 1st January 2010, 1:48am
MZMcBride   I received an e-mail from the Arbitration Committe...   Fri 1st January 2010, 7:51pm
Krimpet   I received an e-mail from the Arbitration Committ...   Fri 1st January 2010, 8:07pm
Lar   I received an e-mail from the Arbitration Committ...   Fri 1st January 2010, 9:34pm
MZMcBride   [quote name='MZMcBride' post='212934' date='Fri 1...   Fri 1st January 2010, 9:55pm
Lar   [quote name='MZMcBride' post='212934' date='Fri ...   Fri 1st January 2010, 10:48pm
Kelly Martin   I received an e-mail from the Arbitration Committe...   Fri 1st January 2010, 10:17pm
The Wales Hunter   I just wish Wikipedia would bit the bullet and a) ...   Fri 1st January 2010, 10:02pm
Nerd   I just wish Wikipedia would bit the bullet and a)...   Fri 1st January 2010, 11:01pm
LessHorrid vanU   If I wanted to run several accounts how likely is...   Fri 1st January 2010, 10:18pm
Cock-up-over-conspiracy   If you want to run several accounts to show how cl...   Sat 2nd January 2010, 5:10am
The Adversary   In certain contentious areas, banning/blocking edi...   Mon 4th January 2010, 4:56pm
SB_Johnny   It's hard to overstate how silly these guessin...   Tue 5th January 2010, 4:22pm
Somey   Officially, The Wikipedia Review doesn't condo...   Tue 5th January 2010, 6:37pm


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th 5 13, 5:04pm