Herostratus - love me or leave me Options Rating

[A Horse With No Name]

Because Wikipedia was lacking dramah.

Is there a point to any of this?

[EricBarbour]

Great, he managed to get some brown-nosing done. Now the count is 59/35/14 with 4 days to go.
Apparently we get to put up with his bullshit for another few months.

[CharlotteWebb]

Great, he managed to get some brown-nosing done. Now the count is 59/35/14 with 4 days to go.
Apparently we get to put up with his bullshit for another few months.

I'm tempted to return to WP just to oppose his ass.

[Eight]

Great, he managed to get some brown-nosing done. Now the count is 59/35/14 with 4 days to go.
Apparently we get to put up with his bullshit for another few months.

I'm tempted to return to WP just to oppose his ass.

He's winning!!!

[ulsterman]

He's winning!!!

He's lost.

Hmmmm....didn't know about a Mrs. Herostratus. Anyone got pictures of this elusive mama?

Can someone please find Horsey a nice filly?

[EricBarbour]

He's winning!!!

He's lost.

It appears that he gets the picture, perhaps.

But some of his admin buddies are over on his talkpage, giving him even more worthless barnstars.
Is there any point to this? Just tell him you appreciate his reasonable handling of the vote,
and move on.

And finally.......

It's a disgrace that there are Wikipedian's, even Arbitrators, that give that site legitimacy by posting there. The absolutely halfwitted shite posted there about you, that some editors were even so daft as to repeat here, and the even worse things you allude to that were attempted, is about standard for it. Those editors giving that site legitimacy need a serious word with themselves if they can just dismiss that thread. You almost got a support just for standing up to them in the way that you did. Most people won't even take the risk of even signing up to it for fear of the real world consequences. MickMacNee (talk) 19:22, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Before you condemn WR, get your own house in order, asshole.

This post has been edited by EricBarbour: Wed 30th June 2010, 10:02pm

[milowent]

Before you condemn WR, get your own house in order, asshole.

aren't you the poster responsible for starting the irresponsible allegations of pedophilia based on a ridiculously obvious joke from Herostratus? even GlassBeadGame is repeating it still today (above)? absurd!

but since wikipedia review doesn't worry about blp violations at all, its not surprising that people would be accused of pedophilia based on evidence similar to oprah and the over 9000 penises claim.

This post has been edited by milowent: Thu 1st July 2010, 2:13am

[GlassBeadGame]

Before you condemn WR, get your own house in order, asshole.

aren't you the poster responsible for starting the irresponsible allegations of pedophilia based on a ridiculously obvious joke from Herostratus? even GlassBeadGame is repeating it still today (above)? absurd!

but since wikipedia review doesn't worry about blp violations at all, its not surprising that people would be accused of pedophilia based on evidence similar to oprah and the over 9000 penises claim.

Thank you Milowent for making a bold face liar out of Sue "Zero Tolerance" Gardner.

[milowent]

Thank you Milowent for making a bold face liar out of Sue "Zero Tolerance" Gardner.

the official statement of a company becomes the reality in the weak-sauce "journalism" generally practiced these days. fox would rather report that pedophiles have found a home or whatever on wikipedia than actually explain the more complex reality.

if she says "Zero Tolerance" that's what will get reported again and again unless some horrible pedophile event is shown to occur.