EXCLUSIVE: Pedophiles Find a Home on Wikipedia - FOXNews Options Rating

[Newsfeed]

FOXNews

Wikipedia has become home base for a loose worldwide network of pedophiles who are campaigning to spin the popular online encyclopedia in ...

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/06/25/...e-on-wikipedia/

[thekohser]

Oh, this is going to have the Foundation in a tussle for the next week or two.

Hey, I didn't know Squeak was a pedo?

[Cedric]

Oh, this is going to have the Foundation in a tussle for the next week or two.

Hey, I didn't know Squeak was a pedo?

Rut roh, Raggy! It looks to me that Jana owes Squeakers a BIG apology. Squeak was actually the "hysterical antiped" who nominated the bio of notorious pedo Marthijn Uittenbogaard "for wikipedia scrapheap". Even more ironic in light of Squeak's last post here at The Review. As far as I know, SqueakBox has been a clear and consistent anti-pedo voice at Wikipedia.

I hope this is not indicative of the accuracy of the rest of the article. It otherwise seems better researched and written than her first two articles.

[GlassBeadGame]

Oh, this is going to have the Foundation in a tussle for the next week or two.

Hey, I didn't know Squeak was a pedo?

Rut roh, Raggy! It looks to me that Jana owes Squeakers a BIG apology. Squeak was actually the "hysterical antiped" who nominated the bio of notorious pedo Marthijn Uittenbogaard "for wikipedia scrapheap". Even more ironic in light of Squeak's last post here at The Review. As far as I know, SqueakBox has been a clear and consistent anti-pedo voice at Wikipedia.

I hope this is not indicative of the accuracy of the rest of the article. It otherwise seems better researched and written than her first two articles.

Ms. Winters seems to be talking about a "BoyChat" user using the pseudonym "SqueakBox." There is no reason to think that that is the same guy using the pseudonym here and on WP. In fact WP User:Squeak Box seems vaguely right headed in such matters although he has lots of problems letting go of WP preconceptions.

To make matters more confusing the PJ guy interviewed is Von Erck who's name so vividly suggests, at least to me, Erick Moeller, the Dr. Strangelove who advises Sue Gardner on free culture things from his position as Assistant Director of WMF.

[Cedric]

Ms. Winters seems to be talking about a "BoyChat" user using the pseudonym "SqueakBox." There is no reason to think that that is the same guy using the pseudonym here and on WP. In fact WP User:Squeak Box seems vaguely right headed in such matters although he has lots of problems letting go of WP preconceptions.

To make matters more confusing the PJ guy interviewed is Von Erck who's name so vividly suggests, at least to me, Erick Moeller, the Dr. Strangelove who advises Sue Gardner on free culture things from his position as Assistant Director of WMF.

I agree with all of this except the first sentence. While it is possible that the editor trying to have a pedo's bio deleted and the pedo activist trying to stop the deletion were both using the same pseudonym, it seems to me far more likely that Winters mentioned the wrong pseudonym in the article by mistake. On Von Erck's "Wikisposure" site, there is no "SqueakBox" mentioned on his list of BoyChat members. The only mention of a "Squeakbox" on the site was to a "Wikipedian" who was threatened by some pedos ("Anyone visiting the Caribbean could do Wikipedia a favor: there's a Squeakbox there that needs fixing to ensure it no longer squeaks."). That has to be the Squeak we know. This time, at least, I will take Von Erck's word for it. I do not intend to take my browser anywhere near BoyChat to do a search.