GNAA articles in the userspace, How the bureaucracy won't leave users alone Options

[Michaeldsuarez]

I'm tire of the thread I started at the ED forum not receiving any attention, so I'm starting a thread on the topic here as well.

On August 9, 2010, I noticed that Jimbo interfered with a GNAA article in the userspace. This was also the day I realized that I needed a WR account in order to talk to the WP critics.

Not much happened to Riffic's article, but on August 27, 2010, "Murdox" (possibly a GNAA sympathizer or member) created his own GNAA article in the userspace. Less than a hour later, PeterSymonds deleted the article and blocked Murdox. Alison reversed these actions.

Today, a MfD case is being held. So the question is: Should these sorts of articles be allowed in the userspace?

This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez: Wed 1st September 2010, 9:17pm

[Michaeldsuarez]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...ser:Murdox/GNAA

The MfD has been closed. I didn't realize these sort of discussions close so fast.

Also, I believe the the MfD simply attracted a new contributor to the article: LiteralKa (T-C-L-K-R-D) . The Streisand effect at work.

This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez: Thu 2nd September 2010, 12:08am

[Gary_Niger]

Also, I believe the the MfD simply attracted a new contributor to the article: LiteralKa (T-C-L-K-R-D) . The Streisand effect at work.

Wow. A LOT has happened since then!

Also, I created the Goatse Security (T-H-L-K-D) article a few days ago, and there doesn't appear to be any opposition so far.

You forgot to put weev's real name in your article. Is it because you are a sysop on Encyclopedia Dramatica, and weev, although he was desysopped after he was arrested, is still more powerful than you and might kick your butt on ED if you insert his real name? Or did you merely miss this article as well as this one?

Well that doesn't seem fair at all. Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. If you do not like something, change it.

The only interactions with the GNAA have been when I nominated the userspace article for deletion and when I "lurked" ( ) their channel

Then what's up with your fascination and incessant discussion about someone's user space draft? Grow up.

Hey Mods, ae we going to be taken over by GNAA trolls like the above?


Also, the page is stupid in user space, not in user space, etc, because the GNAA and all people connected to it are stupid.

Well, I find that rather offensive. I'll bet that you haven't even talked to many, if any, of us. If you had, you'd find that the vast majority of us can conduct relatively intelligent and informed debate, discussion, and even small talk.

This post has been edited by Gary_Niger: Mon 1st August 2011, 4:56am