The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Wikia takes down "Squirtage" wiki, by Gregory Kohs - for Examiner.com
Rating  3
thekohser
post Sat 2nd October 2010, 4:20pm
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



After extensive discussion here, the news media has finally picked up on this recent scandal.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Sun 3rd October 2010, 3:56am
Post #2


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Ha ha ha..........96 references for female ejaculation.........Welcome to Nerdipedia!!

Greg, they must really despise you by now. Keep up the good work.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Zoloft
post Sun 3rd October 2010, 6:11am
Post #3


May we all find solace in our dreams.
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,332
Joined: Fri 15th Jan 2010, 11:08pm
From: Erewhon
Member No.: 16,621



QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sat 2nd October 2010, 8:56pm) *

Ha ha ha..........96 references for female ejaculation.........Welcome to Nerdipedia!!

Greg, they must really despise you by now. Keep up the good work.

That talk page was hilarious...
QUOTE('Travis of the cosmos')
By the way, to pre-empt any claims of bias: if anything my bias is toward the idea that female ejaculate is NOT urine. I recently had a sexual relationship with a squirter and I'd prefer to believe she didn't repeatedly pee on my bed.


This post has been edited by Zoloft: Sun 3rd October 2010, 6:12am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Sun 3rd October 2010, 6:05pm
Post #4


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



Thanks, guys. I personally enjoyed referring to Wikipedia as "the non-profit branch of Wikia".

So, who is voting a post like this one with ONE star?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Mon 4th October 2010, 4:47am
Post #5


Can't actually moderate (or even post)
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,815
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(thekohser @ Sun 3rd October 2010, 1:05pm) *
So, who is voting a post like this one with ONE star?

Well, there is squirting involved, after all!

It looks like that's been offset by more recent higher ratings, but I could go in via the back-end and make it 5 stars with a direct SQL update, if you want. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cock-up-over-conspiracy
post Mon 4th October 2010, 12:26pm
Post #6


Now censored by flckr.com and who else ... ???
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,693
Joined: Sat 6th Dec 2008, 6:08am
Member No.: 9,267



QUOTE(thekohser @ Sun 3rd October 2010, 6:05pm) *
Thanks, guys. I personally enjoyed referring to Wikipedia as "the non-profit branch of Wikia".


Probably quite right, in a way. Spread the meme. Wikipedia was a goodwill, loss leader, to the furtherance of Jimbo's career which it has remained since.

That talk page bit is definitely WP:OR and I am not sure about the language Wikipedia topic though ... "embedded"?
QUOTE
Ejaculation is now firmly embedded in the popular culture

Shouldn't it be "female ejaculation is now firmly sprayed all over popular culture?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Mon 4th October 2010, 1:25pm
Post #7


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Somey @ Mon 4th October 2010, 12:47am) *

... I could go in via the back-end and make it 5 stars with a direct SQL update, if you want. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)

Nah, it looks like it's settled in at about its rightful place at 4 stars out of five.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wikieyeay
post Mon 4th October 2010, 1:57pm
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri 16th Oct 2009, 2:30pm
Member No.: 14,760



QUOTE(thekohser @ Sun 3rd October 2010, 7:05pm) *

Thanks, guys. I personally enjoyed referring to Wikipedia as "the non-profit branch of Wikia".

So, who is voting a post like this one with ONE star?


The wikipedophiles
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Derktar
post Tue 5th October 2010, 4:24am
Post #9


WR Black Ops
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 1,029
Joined: Sat 11th Aug 2007, 3:37am
From: Torrance, California, USA
Member No.: 2,381

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Mon 4th October 2010, 6:25am) *

QUOTE(Somey @ Mon 4th October 2010, 12:47am) *

... I could go in via the back-end and make it 5 stars with a direct SQL update, if you want. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)

Nah, it looks like it's settled in at about its rightful place at 4 stars out of five.

About the only time I bother to rate a thread is when I read an interesting thread that someone's given one star too, I always upvote 5.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th 12 14, 2:40pm