The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> 

This forum is populated by RSS feeds from various news sources. Members may start topics here and reply to them, but please limit new topics to links to actual news stories. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to the Wikipedia:Glossary.

For accurate information about the "Wikipedia vs. Britannica" study by Nature, please read this.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> In Rancorous Times, Can Wikipedia Show Us How to All Get Along? - The Atlantic (blog)
Newsfeed
post Tue 19th October 2010, 3:11pm
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm
Member No.: 2,885




<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />In Rancorous Times, Can [b]Wikipedia Show Us How to All Get Along?[/b]
The Atlantic (blog)
Collective problem solving is a tough business. Just ask Congress. Or your partner. Now, extend your team to thousands of anonymous individuals and define ...



View the article
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Tue 19th October 2010, 3:49pm
Post #2


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,739
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Tue 19th October 2010, 11:11am) *

In Rancorous Times, Can Wikipedia Show Us How to All Get Along?

The Atlantic (blog)

Collective problem solving is a tough business. Just ask Congress. Or your partner. Now, extend your team to thousands of anonymous individuals and define …


Yet another Sop du Jour from the Berkman Lose-Your-Luncheon Series …

Jon sick.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Tue 19th October 2010, 3:56pm
Post #3


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,739
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE

Get a clue …

Here's a few —

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showforum=62

Try to imagine a Congress where 3 or 4 members can get together in the dead of night and ban members who oppose their POV — that's the sort of “collaboration” they have in Wikipediot Land.

Jonny Cache, 19 Oct 2010

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Tue 19th October 2010, 6:42pm
Post #4


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



It's just awful.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Tue 19th October 2010, 7:05pm
Post #5


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,739
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Tue 19th October 2010, 2:42pm) *

It's just awful.


The usual sort of φøøtile discussion …

QUOTE

Wikipedism is the mess of practices that it is. Anyone who proposes those practices, as they are in reality and not in some wishful fantasy, as a model for solving social problems is either seriously lacking in acquaintance with the realities of what goes on in Wikipedia or just hasn't bothered to think it through. At any rate, that would be the charitable interpretation.

Jonny Cache, 19 Oct 2010


Enuff o' dat …

Jon bored.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Avirosa
post Tue 19th October 2010, 8:53pm
Post #6


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri 16th Jul 2010, 8:08pm
Member No.: 22,979



QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Tue 19th October 2010, 4:11pm) *

<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />In Rancorous Times, Can [b]Wikipedia Show Us How to All Get Along?[/b]
The Atlantic (blog)
Collective problem solving is a tough business. Just ask Congress. Or your partner. Now, extend your team to thousands of anonymous individuals and define ...

<a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&ned=us&ncl=dsduDx8JWTJu8UM" target="_blank"></a>

View the article


Truly a gem of unintentional revelation:

Reagle
QUOTE
Something has to resist the tendency of our online conversations to the lowest common denominator, and the tendency to see each other as Hitler," he said. "I taught conflict management and a lot of this stuff is relevant and germane to conflict management."

Reagle, who will present on his work at the Berkman Center today, argues that the way Wikipedia users think about their project has its roots in the utopian visions of H.G. Wells .....


That'd be the H.G.Wells who was a fan of Eugenics ?

http://reason.com/archives/2002/03/26/euge...-a-time-machine
QUOTE
Wells plays a particularly interesting role in the eugenics movement. In 1904 he discussed a survey paper by Francis Galton, co-founder of eugenics. Galton had concerned himself mainly with "positive eugenics," proposing for instance that the marriage of college professors, supposedly the best of the race, be subsidized.


A.virosa
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th 5 13, 1:45am