| |
|
  |
Out with Godwin, In with the new sycophant |
|
|
| Minor4th |
Sun 24th October 2010, 7:09pm
|

New Member

Group: Contributors
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun 25th Jul 2010, 5:29am
Member No.: 23,401
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Text @ Sun 24th October 2010, 1:33pm)  QUOTE Hmmmmm.... Do you disagree on something that has been said, or are you skeptic of the fact that F bemolle is equivalent to E? Well, I don't have my glasses on so I'm not sure what your post says but I do see that there is a question mark at the end. I am just reading over the thread again. It's a strange way to fire someone, and there's no question that's what it is. It's hard to put a severance package together in 3 days. My initial thought is that Sue really wants him gone immediately but the Foundation needs Godwin to turn over all of his messes to the new guy so the Foundation's 12MM bank account isnt up for grabs. Sounds to me like they 're paying him to be a consultant, and I bet they're paying him a nice amount because he's probabably pissed enough to walk off and let them drown in their own feces. Maybe a non-disclosure agreement about the circumstances of the termination -- everything else would pretty much be covered by the attorney-client privilege, and he can't disclose it anyway unless it's some sort of whistleblower scenario. I'm interested to see how this one turns out. I was intrigued by the way Godwin handled the FBI seal inquiry and thought it was incredibly foolish and risky to taunt the Feds with a letter that read like an ANI argument. I mean, doesnt everyone know the Feds are vindictive and they'll find a reason to make life miserable if you get their attention? I don't know if that has anything to do with this termination, but reading between the lines, the comment about Godwin doing what he thought was in WMF's best interest (read, Godwin's judgment sucks) -- that could apply to the way he handled the FBI sitch. There are probably others if that is the way Godwin goes about practicing law..
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SB_Johnny |
Sun 24th October 2010, 7:35pm
|

It wasn't me who made honky-tonk angels
      
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,128
Joined: Mon 15th Sep 2008, 3:10pm
Member No.: 8,272
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Minor4th @ Sun 24th October 2010, 3:09pm)  I was intrigued by the way Godwin handled the FBI seal inquiry and thought it was incredibly foolish and risky to taunt the Feds with a letter that read like an ANI argument. I mean, doesnt everyone know the Feds are vindictive and they'll find a reason to make life miserable if you get their attention? I don't know if that has anything to do with this termination, but reading between the lines, the comment about Godwin doing what he thought was in WMF's best interest (read, Godwin's judgment sucks) -- that could apply to the way he handled the FBI sitch. There are probably others if that is the way Godwin goes about practicing law..
Indeed. When a lawyer starts sounding like a wikilawyer in "#real_life" situations, he should probably stay away from the bar and/or any keyboard that's connected to a modem. I hope our resident lawyers won't be tempted to say yes to an inside hire, because that way lies a dead end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Milton Roe |
Sun 24th October 2010, 8:27pm
|

Known alias of J. Random Troll
        
Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(SB_Johnny @ Sun 24th October 2010, 12:35pm)  QUOTE(Minor4th @ Sun 24th October 2010, 3:09pm)  I was intrigued by the way Godwin handled the FBI seal inquiry and thought it was incredibly foolish and risky to taunt the Feds with a letter that read like an ANI argument. I mean, doesnt everyone know the Feds are vindictive and they'll find a reason to make life miserable if you get their attention? I don't know if that has anything to do with this termination, but reading between the lines, the comment about Godwin doing what he thought was in WMF's best interest (read, Godwin's judgment sucks) -- that could apply to the way he handled the FBI sitch. There are probably others if that is the way Godwin goes about practicing law..
Indeed. When a lawyer starts sounding like a wikilawyer in "#real_life" situations, he should probably stay away from the bar and/or any keyboard that's connected to a modem. I hope our resident lawyers won't be tempted to say yes to an inside hire, because that way lies a dead end. Our resident lawyers are plenty smart enough to know that. If the FBI matter was part of it, Godwin was ill-used, since I doubt he did anything without consulting Sue. She probably asked him if the law was on WMF's side and he told her it was, and she then said: "Good, because we don't take down anything we don't absolutely have to." So he asked what he should do, and she probably told him to point out the law to the FBI. Which he did. If there were any repercussions, I imagine them sort of like this: Sue: "Mike, I hear the FBI is really mad at us, now!" Godwin: "Well, I don't know why. I just pointed out that the law is aimed at reproducing I.D. cards and such.." Sue: "But you didn't have to be so condescending while doing it. I know I laughed at the letter before you sent it, but I'm not a lawyer. You're supposed to be wiser in these matters. Now they'll think that being snide, is insulting to them personally." Godwin: "It's not. Lawyers do this all the time and don't take it personally. At the FBI they're big boys and can tell the difference between making fun of an idea and making fun of the people who believe the idea..." Sue: "You don't know your history! Do you know Galileo attacked the ideas of some high-up Roman Catholic Church people, and they held that he was attacking the church itself?" Godwin: "What do I care what the Catholic Church did?" Sue: "The Catholic Church speaks for the views of God Almighty. So obviously God thinks this way, too." Godwin: "Er, you know I'm Jewish, don't you?" Sue: "Speaking of which! If your people weren't always making snarky and legalistic arguments to put people down, maybe a lot fewer of them would have wound up in prison camps. Ever thought of that?" Godwin. "Oy, I saw this coming..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Jon Awbrey |
Sun 24th October 2010, 11:20pm
|

τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
        
Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,739
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Sun 24th October 2010, 4:27pm)  QUOTE(SB_Johnny @ Sun 24th October 2010, 12:35pm)  QUOTE(Minor4th @ Sun 24th October 2010, 3:09pm)  I was intrigued by the way Godwin handled the FBI seal inquiry and thought it was incredibly foolish and risky to taunt the Feds with a letter that read like an ANI argument. I mean, doesnt everyone know the Feds are vindictive and they'll find a reason to make life miserable if you get their attention? I don't know if that has anything to do with this termination, but reading between the lines, the comment about Godwin doing what he thought was in WMF's best interest (read, Godwin's judgment sucks) — that could apply to the way he handled the FBI sitch. There are probably others if that is the way Godwin goes about practicing law …
Indeed. When a lawyer starts sounding like a wikilawyer in "#real_life" situations, he should probably stay away from the bar and/or any keyboard that's connected to a modem. I hope our resident lawyers won't be tempted to say yes to an inside hire, because that way lies a dead end. Our resident lawyers are plenty smart enough to know that. If the FBI matter was part of it, Godwin was ill-used, since I doubt he did anything without consulting Sue. She probably asked him if the law was on WMF's side and he told her it was, and she then said: "Good, because we don't take down anything we don't absolutely have to." So he asked what he should do, and she probably told him to point out the law to the FBI. Which he did. If there were any repercussions, I imagine them sort of like this: Sue: "Mike, I hear the FBI is really mad at us, now!" Godwin: "Well, I don't know why. I just pointed out that the law is aimed at reproducing I.D. cards and such.." Sue: "But you didn't have to be so condescending while doing it. I know I laughed at the letter before you sent it, but I'm not a lawyer. You're supposed to be wiser in these matters. Now they'll think that being snide, is insulting to them personally." Godwin: "It's not. Lawyers do this all the time and don't take it personally. At the FBI they're big boys and can tell the difference between making fun of an idea and making fun of the people who believe the idea..." Sue: "You don't know your history! Do you know Galileo attacked the ideas of some high-up Roman Catholic Church people, and they held that he was attacking the church itself?" Godwin: "What do I care what the Catholic Church did?" Sue: "The Catholic Church speaks for the views of God Almighty. So obviously God thinks this way, too." Godwin: "Er, you know I'm Jewish, don't you?" Sue: "Speaking of which! If your people weren't always making snarky and legalistic arguments to put people down, maybe a lot fewer of them would have wound up in prison camps. Ever thought of that?" Godwin. "Oy, I saw this coming …" Ω∂! — It's like I was there in the room !!!Jon 
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Minor4th |
Mon 25th October 2010, 12:57am
|

New Member

Group: Contributors
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun 25th Jul 2010, 5:29am
Member No.: 23,401
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Sun 24th October 2010, 3:27pm)  [ Our resident lawyers are plenty smart enough to know that.
If the FBI matter was part of it, Godwin was ill-used, since I doubt he did anything without consulting Sue. She probably asked him if the law was on WMF's side and he told her it was, and she then said: "Good, because we don't take down anything we don't absolutely have to." So he asked what he should do, and she probably told him to point out the law to the FBI. Which he did. If there were any repercussions, I imagine them sort of like this: <snip>
But the thing is Godwin got the law wrong, and he was wrong in such an unprofessional, arrogant, ridiculous sounding piece of bravado -- so that makes his wrong-ness monumental and spectacular If Sue has the bad judgment to think Godwin can school the FBI on the law, then she deserves to reap whatever Godwin has sown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Subtle Bee |
Mon 25th October 2010, 1:38am
|

melli fera, fera...
   
Group: Inactive
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue 9th Mar 2010, 3:06pm
Member No.: 17,787

|
QUOTE(Minor4th @ Sun 24th October 2010, 5:57pm)  But the thing is Godwin got the law wrong, and he was wrong in such an unprofessional, arrogant, ridiculous sounding piece of bravado -- so that makes his wrong-ness monumental and spectacular If Sue has the bad judgment to think Godwin can school the FBI on the law, then she deserves to reap whatever Godwin has sown. Sure, deserves. Lots of people deserve things. But going with this plausible theory, she now realizes she was wrong, and this would help explain the mutual interest in shutting up about circumstances. I think the "tell" will be in their reaction to the next similar controversy - something someone might consider helping happen, at the appropriate time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| thekohser |
Tue 26th October 2010, 6:57pm
|
Member
        
Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911

|
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Tue 26th October 2010, 12:02pm)  Can anyone confirm that the pay off came directly from Jimbo, and not the Wikimedia Foundation, so that it wont appear on the books ... and hence the NDA ?
I mean, I have no idea if the guy is a gentleman but he does know a whole load of shit about Wales and the operation.
If you think Jimbo would pay off someone out of his OWN POCKET, unless it was a bribe to keep quiet about something illegal that Jimbo had done, then you might as well call for a pig-flying festival tomorrow, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Kevin |
Tue 26th October 2010, 9:27pm
|
Member
  
Group: Contributors
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat 28th Feb 2009, 2:58am
From: Adelaide, Australia
Member No.: 10,522
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 27th October 2010, 4:57am)  QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Tue 26th October 2010, 12:02pm)  Can anyone confirm that the pay off came directly from Jimbo, and not the Wikimedia Foundation, so that it wont appear on the books ... and hence the NDA ?
I mean, I have no idea if the guy is a gentleman but he does know a whole load of shit about Wales and the operation.
If you think Jimbo would pay off someone out of his OWN POCKET, unless it was a bribe to keep quiet about something illegal that Jimbo had done, then you might as well call for a pig-flying festival tomorrow, too. You were saying... 2010 Flyin' Pig BBQ & Music Festival
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Somey |
Wed 27th October 2010, 4:08am
|

Can't actually moderate
        
Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275

|
QUOTE(Kevin @ Tue 26th October 2010, 4:27pm)  Oh come on - that was like two weeks ago.And where does this notion of Jimbo "paying off" Godwin himself come from? It might be necessary to strike that one - it's one thing to accuse Jimbo of malfeasance, it's another to accuse Jimbo of malfeasance that doesn't even advance his personal interests. Long story short, I think the basic reason for easing Godwin out of the WMF is that he's too visible. Sue and Erik don't like competition any more than Jimbo does, and they all know that virtually nothing they do can hold up under any sort of public scrutiny whatsoever. They want the attention focused on them, personally, not on what the WMF actually does, most of which is indefensible. Having Godwin around was probably a major impediment to achieving that ideal situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SB_Johnny |
Wed 27th October 2010, 2:45pm
|

It wasn't me who made honky-tonk angels
      
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,128
Joined: Mon 15th Sep 2008, 3:10pm
Member No.: 8,272
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Tue 26th October 2010, 12:02pm)  Can anyone confirm that the pay off came directly from Jimbo, and not the Wikimedia Foundation, so that it wont appear on the books ... and hence the NDA ?
I mean, I have no idea if the guy is a gentleman but he does know a whole load of shit about Wales and the operation.
As Minor 4th pointed out earlier, his hands are tied on the actual legal stuff due to attorney-client privileges. OTOH, he probably knows all sorts of gossip they'd rather not have people know about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |