A Personal appeal from Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, More damned lies from a desperate man? Options

[powercorrupts]

Please read - A personal appeal from Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales

Please read this appeal from our founder and then donate to Wikimedia UK using the form opposite. Your donation will go towards supporting the global projects as well as activities in the UK.

I got a lot of funny looks ten years ago when I started talking to people about Wikipedia.

Let’s just say some of the business types were skeptical of the notion that volunteers from all across the world could come together to create a remarkable pool of human knowledge – all for the simple purpose of sharing.

No ads. No profits. No agenda.

A decade after its founding, more than 380 million people use Wikipedia and its sister sites every month - almost a third of the Internet-connected world.

It is the 5th most popular website in the world. The other four have been built and maintained with billions of dollars in investment, huge corporate staffs and relentless marketing.

But, Wikipedia isn’t anything like a commercial website. It is a community creation, written by volunteers making one entry at a time. You are part of our community. And I’m writing today to ask you to protect and sustain Wikipedia.

Together, we can keep it free of charge and free of advertising. We can keep it open – you can use the information in Wikipedia any way you want. We can keep it growing – spreading knowledge everywhere, and inviting participation from everyone.

Each year at this time, we reach out to ask you and others all across the Wikimedia community to help sustain our joint enterprise with a modest donation of $20, $35, $50 or more.

If you value Wikipedia as a source of information – and a source of inspiration – I hope you’ll choose to act right now.

All the best,

Jimmy Wales

Founder, Wikipedia

P.S. Wikipedia is about the power of people like us to do extraordinary things. People like us write Wikipedia, one word at a time. People like us fund it, one donation at a time. It's proof of our collective potential to change the world.

Wikimedia UK is the operating name of Wiki UK Limited.
Wiki UK Ltd is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827.
The Registered Office is at 23 Cartwright Way, Nottingham, NG9 1RL, United Kingdom

.

I can't quite believe he's simply going for the cash this time (and didn't we have a donation push just a while back?) - unless he's worried about someone pulling a plug somewhere. This partly looks like a propaganda campaign to me. Either way, I reckon he's a worried man. He must know the flak he will get. I mean, apart from all the bullshit, asking for £100, £50, £30 or £20? Pound sterling for Christ's sake? Has he been over here lately? And "If you value Wikipedia as a source of information – and a source of inspiration – I hope you’ll choose to act right now." - it's a bit damn pushy.

And what are the "activities in the.. UK"? The bloody dodgy-as-Hell nationalistic 'Chapters', that's what. "It's proof of our collective potential to change the world."

This post has been edited by powercorrupts: Fri 12th November 2010, 5:46pm

[thekohser]

I don't want to speak too soon, but this year's fundraiser (recall in past years, the "Jimmy Wales appeal" is reserved for the home stretch) could be the textbook case of "blowing one's load" too early.

[thekohser]

I don't want to speak too soon, but this year's fundraiser (recall in past years, the "Jimmy Wales appeal" is reserved for the home stretch) could be the textbook case of "blowing one's load" too early.

Yesterday (Day 26 of the campaign) was the lowest revenue yet, less than half of the previous day's intake.

With about 40% of the campaign calendar gone, and only about 41% of the target level met ($16 million in "small" contributions), and the big punch of Jimbo's appeal already shot, it looks very likely (unless the WMF and Beaudette have a secret weapon up their sleeve -- Silvia Saint?) that the fundraising campaign is going to come up very, very short. Perhaps $6 million short.

[thekohser]

Yesterday (Day 26 of the campaign) was the lowest revenue yet, less than half of the previous day's intake.

Apparently, the WMF tricked me into making a mistake. They post partial daily data, as the day progresses. So, when I looked at Day 26, it was much worse that how it ended up at the end of the day. It still doesn't look good for the WMF. I'm predicting that by January 5, they'll be at a cumulative total of $9.5 million, which will be well below their goal.

[SB_Johnny]

Yesterday (Day 26 of the campaign) was the lowest revenue yet, less than half of the previous day's intake.

Apparently, the WMF tricked me into making a mistake. They post partial daily data, as the day progresses. So, when I looked at Day 26, it was much worse that how it ended up at the end of the day. It still doesn't look good for the WMF. I'm predicting that by January 5, they'll be at a cumulative total of $9.5 million, which will be well below their goal.

The downward trend is still quite strong though. If they don't hit the goal in time, do they just keep putting more banners up? What if they don't hit it by next November?

Today it's Sue Gardner gracing the top of my watchlist.

[anthony]

Yesterday (Day 26 of the campaign) was the lowest revenue yet, less than half of the previous day's intake.

Apparently, the WMF tricked me into making a mistake. They post partial daily data, as the day progresses. So, when I looked at Day 26, it was much worse that how it ended up at the end of the day. It still doesn't look good for the WMF. I'm predicting that by January 5, they'll be at a cumulative total of $9.5 million, which will be well below their goal.

The downward trend is still quite strong though. If they don't hit the goal in time, do they just keep putting more banners up?

Hasn't it been common for them to not reach their goal? I seem to remember there being a few messages about "oh my god we're not going to reach our goal what are we going to do" a number of years.

[NuclearWarfare]

Yesterday (Day 26 of the campaign) was the lowest revenue yet, less than half of the previous day's intake.

Apparently, the WMF tricked me into making a mistake. They post partial daily data, as the day progresses. So, when I looked at Day 26, it was much worse that how it ended up at the end of the day. It still doesn't look good for the WMF. I'm predicting that by January 5, they'll be at a cumulative total of $9.5 million, which will be well below their goal.

The downward trend is still quite strong though. If they don't hit the goal in time, do they just keep putting more banners up?

Hasn't it been common for them to not reach their goal? I seem to remember there being a few messages about "oh my god we're not going to reach our goal what are we going to do" a number of years.

Not really sure about that, but I wouldn't be surprised if there is a big uptick round around Christmas and then also the last few days before New Year's when people are like "wait, I still have tax deductions I can make this year." Is a graph of last year's donation history up?