|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
| radek |
Sun 26th December 2010, 10:29pm
Post
#21
|
|
Über Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 699 Joined: Sat 28th Nov 2009, 10:40pm Member No.: 15,651 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
There have been a couple of references here to this guy. One compared him to Robespierre and claimed that he would turn Arbcom into a Committee of Public Safety. The Committee of Public Safety murdered thousands of people. Is Sandstein that bad? I've come across him a few times and he seemed pretty bad, but no worse than many. What's the deal? I suppose, like Robespierre, he is also a lawyer. Oy, that was me comparing him to Robespierre though that was in the general atmosphere of ArbCom Election jest so I really hope nobody thinks that I think that he is capable of murdering thousands of people (bannning thousands, yes, murder, no) or something. Also in a way it was an underhanded compliment (mixed with criticism and fun poking), and play on the fact that Robespierre was called the "Incorruptible" I do think Sandstein is "fair", to the extent that has meaning on Wikipedia (per Gomi's comment) and actually quite resilient with respect to political manipulation or influence - he'd ban an ArbCom member, as fast as a random IP if it was deserved (hence the "Incorruptible"). However over the past half year or so I think I've witnessed him experience some serious burn-out when it comes to administratin' and as a result I think his decisions have become more erratic and emotion-driven. Of course, in that past half year, he slapped a 3 day block on me for what I thought was a completely legit AE request (especially since it followed up recent statement made by Shell Kinney). I AM a little bit bitter about that, but in the grand scheme of things, it's small potatoes. I see he has gone on vacation - which is good. It'd also be good if he comes back. This post has been edited by radek: Mon 27th December 2010, 4:47am |
| Zoloft |
Mon 27th December 2010, 2:24pm
Post
#22
|
![]() May we all find solace in our dreams. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,332 Joined: Fri 15th Jan 2010, 11:08pm From: Erewhon Member No.: 16,621 |
There have been a couple of references here to this guy. One compared him to Robespierre and claimed that he would turn Arbcom into a Committee of Public Safety. The Committee of Public Safety murdered thousands of people. Is Sandstein that bad? I've come across him a few times and he seemed pretty bad, but no worse than many. What's the deal? I suppose, like Robespierre, he is also a lawyer. Oy, that was me comparing him to Robespierre though that was in the general atmosphere of ArbCom Election jest so I really hope nobody thinks that I think that he is capable of murdering thousands of people (bannning thousands, yes, murder, no) or something. Also in a way it was an underhanded compliment (mixed with criticism and fun poking), and play on the fact that Robespierre was called the "Incorruptible" I do think Sandstein is "fair", to the extent that has meaning on Wikipedia (per Gomi's comment) and actually quite resilient with respect to political manipulation or influence - he'd ban an ArbCom member, as fast as a random IP if it was deserved (hence the "Incorruptible"). However over the past half year or so I think I've witnessed him experience some serious burn-out when it comes to administratin' and as a result I think his decisions have become more erratic and emotion-driven. Of course, in that past half year, he slapped a 3 day block on me for what I thought was a completely legit AE request (especially since it followed up recent statement made by Shell Kinney). I AM a little bit bitter about that, but in the grand scheme of things, it's small potatoes. I see he has gone on vacation - which is good. It'd also be good if he comes back. Sandstein lacks only a willing Jean Valjean to become Inspector Javert. |
| MUCHERS22 |
Fri 31st December 2010, 6:36pm
Post
#23
|
|
Neophyte Group: Contributors Posts: 7 Joined: Sat 14th Aug 2010, 2:53pm Member No.: 24,831 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Almost as amusing as Wikipedia's "facebook". What a motley crew. Except for Gwen Gale, who is apparently really hot. Hot? Looks like a shemale to me. Other than that I agree, its a pathetic looking posse. This post has been edited by MUCHERS22: Fri 31st December 2010, 6:36pm |
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th 6 13, 8:36pm |