The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Cirt's Scientology edits - January 2011
carbuncle
post Sun 23rd January 2011, 12:35am
Post #1


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,601
Joined: Sun 30th Mar 2008, 4:48pm
Member No.: 5,544



QUOTE
I accept that there has been significant criticism relating to my editing of certain pages relating to Scientology. I will do my best to take this criticism on-board, and adjust my future actions accordingly. To begin towards that process, I have gone ahead and removed 66 Scientology-related BLP pages from my watchlist. I am going to shift my focus away from this topic of Scientology in general, and of BLPs within this topic in particular.

Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 01:33, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Comment: As stated here diff, I am going to avoid editing within the topic of Scientology, unless directly related to prior GA and FA projects. -- Cirt (talk) 01:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

I am intending to do a monthly thread here about Cirt's Scientology edits, because I would like to help them kick their nasty habit. Cirt, I don't say this in a mean way, but when you edit articles related to Scientology, it makes your fingers and breath smell like Scientology. And no one wants to kiss someone whose breath smells like Scientology.

Cirt managed to get into an edit war over reducing the overly long and repetitive lede to List of people who accepted Golden Raspberry Awards. When their opponent refused to be bullied, Cirt capitulated. There is currently a thread at ANI about Cirt's creation of an edit notice on the related Golden Raspberry Award. Edit notices are displayed when editing an article and can only be created by admins, so Cirt doing this while involved in a dispute looks like a typically petty abuse of admin rights. Scientology connection: Battlefield Earth, a movie based on the L Ron Hubbard book and starring a gaggle of Scientologists.

Cirt created Beyond the First Amendment. Scientology connection:To quote from WP's Operation Clambake article: In Beyond the First Amendment: The Politics of Free Speech and Pluralism, author Samuel Peter Nelson raises the question: "Why should a private actor (Church of Scientology) in the United States have the power to restrict the speech of a Dutch citizen publishing in the Netherlands whose speech is protected by Dutch law?"

I don't think it will be very long before an intervention is required.

This post has been edited by carbuncle: Sun 23rd January 2011, 12:36am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
carbuncle
post Fri 28th January 2011, 2:54pm
Post #2


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,601
Joined: Sun 30th Mar 2008, 4:48pm
Member No.: 5,544



A new article from Cirt: The Best American Magazine Writing 2007. No mention of Scientology in the article, which is odd considering what Cirt refers to as "an investigative journalism article for Rolling Stone by Janet Reitman" is entitled "Inside Scientology".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
carbuncle   Cirt's Scientology edits - January 2011   Sun 23rd January 2011, 12:35am
carbuncle   Cirt removed a prod from Leipzig Human Rights Awar...   Sun 23rd January 2011, 12:52am
Silver seren   And what exactly is wrong with the sourcing on the...   Sun 23rd January 2011, 5:19am
carbuncle   And what exactly is wrong with the sourcing on th...   Sun 23rd January 2011, 8:35am
Herschelkrustofsky   And what exactly is wrong with the sourcing on t...   Sun 23rd January 2011, 1:12pm
EricBarbour   Carb, you can certainly post regular threads about...   Mon 24th January 2011, 12:21am
spp   And what exactly is wrong with the sourcing on t...   Mon 24th January 2011, 4:42pm
Kelly Martin   I'm one of those people who doesn't care i...   Sun 23rd January 2011, 3:02pm
HRIP7   A new article from Cirt: [wp]The Best American Ma...   Sun 30th January 2011, 10:45pm
carbuncle   [quote name='carbuncle' post='266898' date='Fri 2...   Mon 31st January 2011, 4:08am
HRIP7   Here's another two examples from this month. ...   Mon 31st January 2011, 8:32am
Jagärdu   The ICSA is a [url=http://books.google.co.uk/boo...   Mon 31st January 2011, 2:17pm
Avirosa   That said, nothing published by the ICSA is in an...   Wed 2nd February 2011, 12:10pm
HRIP7   [quote name='Jagärdu' post='267097' date='Mon 31...   Wed 2nd February 2011, 5:07pm
carbuncle   Read the rest here.   Mon 31st January 2011, 10:50pm
HRIP7   Read the rest [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...   Tue 1st February 2011, 1:29am
Milton Roe   [quote name='carbuncle' post='267132' date='Mon 3...   Tue 1st February 2011, 1:38am
HRIP7   [quote name='HRIP7' post='267152' date='Mon 31st ...   Tue 1st February 2011, 3:55am
carbuncle   The article had three AfDs: [url=http://en.wikipe...   Tue 1st February 2011, 4:48am
Milton Roe   The article had three AfDs: [url=http://en.wikip...   Tue 1st February 2011, 5:06am
HRIP7   Well, she might come by that honestly, as Sciento...   Tue 1st February 2011, 5:57am
Detective   Scientology is batshit insane. :) In the same l...   Tue 1st February 2011, 9:50am
HRIP7   In my experience, Christian Scientists are nice, ...   Tue 1st February 2011, 11:02am
Milton Roe   [quote name='Milton Roe' post='267166' date='Tue ...   Tue 1st February 2011, 6:03pm
Avirosa   Yeah, they're sweeties, those Christian Scien...   Wed 2nd February 2011, 9:30am
HRIP7   Was disappointed to see the WP version has no [b]...   Tue 1st February 2011, 4:33am
Milton Roe   Was disappointed to see the WP version has no [b...   Tue 1st February 2011, 4:58am


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd 5 13, 9:29am