The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article CandidatesFeatured Article ReviewArticles for DeletionDeletion Review

> Two shot, but what about the five shot?
thekohser
post Tue 25th January 2011, 4:43am
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



A splendid bit of vandalism and irrelevant link spam, all wrapped up in one. It's lasted well over 1.5 years, and it's been seen by over 30,000 people.

QUOTE
Similarly, a three shot has three people in the composition of the frame. In these shots the characters are given more importance; this type of image can also be seen in print advertising.

Four shot scenes are relatively uncommon, but when seen regularly comprise four persons within frame.

Five shot scenes, whilst more common, rarely have 5 people in them and typically have either 6 or 3.5 (the extra 0.5 allowing for a balance of dramatic irony and mise-en-scene).[1]
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Somey
post Fri 28th January 2011, 7:01pm
Post #2


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



The really ironic thing about this is that five-shot scenes (or what we showbiz folks call "five-shotters") actually do usually have either 6 or 3.5 people in them. Only it's not to obtain a balance of dramatic irony or mise-en-scene, it's either to make the group-sex orgy seem like a bigger event, or else to throw in some gratuitous blood and guts, which is what you get when you chop a person in half on camera.

Isn't there some sort of "speedy delete" rule for things like this? Or did they get rid of that and not tell us? I mean, what a stupid article.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
thekohser   Two shot   Tue 25th January 2011, 4:43am
Ottava   A splendid bit of vandalism and irrelevant link s...   Tue 25th January 2011, 4:54am
thekohser   I'm lovin' that the article remains unfixe...   Tue 25th January 2011, 7:26pm
thekohser   Pure joy. I pointed this out before the 25th of J...   Fri 28th January 2011, 3:43pm
Ottava   Pure joy. I pointed this out before the 25th of ...   Fri 28th January 2011, 6:34pm
thekohser   All right, we have our weakling. Is "PhilKni...   Fri 28th January 2011, 5:39pm


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th 5 13, 5:58am