The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

> Dreadstar case
-DS-
post Thu 10th March 2011, 2:20pm
Post #1


Ethernaut
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 163
Joined: Sun 23rd Jan 2011, 3:44pm
Member No.: 39,458



It seems Dreadstar overturned one of Sandstein's AE blocks, and was promptly dragged to Arbcom in retaliation .

I don't really care what happens either way, but holy crap look at the hypocrisy from SlimVirgin right there.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Herschelkrustofsky
post Thu 10th March 2011, 2:49pm
Post #2


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



This seems complicated, one of those situations where you can't tell the players without a playbook. The SlimVirgin hypocrisy is not immediately obvious to me, although don't get me wrong, I haven't a scintilla of doubt that it exists. I suspect that corrupt WikiAlliances are at play here; Dreadstar was recently barnstarred by Will Beback for perma-blocking a pro-LaRouche editor, which would also earn him big points with SV and Four Deuces, both of whom show up to comment here on Dreadstar's behalf. The Pseudoscience topic probably triggers sympathetic action from any number of well-established tag-teams, such as the Climate Changers. However, the real motives of all concerned are buried here in a tl:dr mass of WikiLawyering.

If there is any applicable jargon that I have neglected to use in this post, please let me know.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
-DS-
post Fri 11th March 2011, 8:48am
Post #3


Ethernaut
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 163
Joined: Sun 23rd Jan 2011, 3:44pm
Member No.: 39,458



QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Thu 10th March 2011, 3:49pm) *

The SlimVirgin hypocrisy is not immediately obvious to me, although don't get me wrong, I haven't a scintilla of doubt that it exists.


SV was desysopped as retaliation for overturning an AE block.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
radek
post Sat 12th March 2011, 5:01am
Post #4


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 699
Joined: Sat 28th Nov 2009, 10:40pm
Member No.: 15,651

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(-DS- @ Fri 11th March 2011, 2:48am) *

QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Thu 10th March 2011, 3:49pm) *

The SlimVirgin hypocrisy is not immediately obvious to me, although don't get me wrong, I haven't a scintilla of doubt that it exists.


SV was desysopped as retaliation for overturning an AE block.


Wait, she was desysopped for overturning an AE block and here she is "defending" (somewhat halfheartedly) another editor who is in danger of being desysopped for overturning an AE block - I got that right? How is that hypocrisy? It sounds like consistency to me. Of course it could be a self serving, cynical kind of consistency, but it is not hypocritical. Hypocritical would be if she had insisted on her right to overturn AE blocks but wanted to have Dreadstar desyssoped for the same.

Let's keep the sins straight here.

(oh I see someone else already caught this)

This post has been edited by radek: Sat 12th March 2011, 5:04am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Sat 12th March 2011, 5:53am
Post #5


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(radek @ Sat 12th March 2011, 12:01am) *

It sounds like consistency to me. Of course it could be a self serving, cynical kind of consistency, but it is not hypocritical. Hypocritical would be if she had insisted on her right to overturn AE blocks but wanted to have Dreadstar desyssoped for the same.

Let's keep the sins straight here.

(oh I see someone else already caught this)


Why don't we call it 'ironic' and call it a day?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 5 13, 5:41am