|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
| EricBarbour |
Tue 15th March 2011, 4:19am
Post
#1
|
|
blah ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 5,919 Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am Member No.: 5,066 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
The self-serving Boing Boing post sums it up well.
QUOTE Psychology Wiki, like the unrelated Wikipedia project, requires a reliable source for any disputed fact, but that is one of those things that's very hard for people outside of wiki-world to understand. Wikipedia's policy is verifiability, not truth. This simple rule is a cornerstone policy, one of the five pillars. Well, Andrea, they HAD a "verifiable fact". The "fact" said that Rubin died in 1997. Instead of fixing an error in a printed book, Wikia chose to repeat an error. That's the major problem with Wikia, and by extension Wikipedia: "facts" are difficult to challenge, esp. when they are wrong. Try to correct it, and some officious bastard comes along and re-creates falsehood. And yet, she still loves WP, after having a Wikia-induced headache. Have I pointed out a few of the cases of Wikia material ending up on WP and vice versa? Here ya go, cut-pasted from the "private area": QUOTE There's a Wikia wiki dedicated to Azumanga Daioh. There's a Wikia wiki about One Piece. There's a Wikia wiki about K-On. There's a massive Wikia wiki about Babylon 5. And there's a monstrous Wikia wiki about Buffy. Much of the content is cut-pasted from or to Wikipedia. The difference: Jimbo makes money from the Wikia versions, of course! And people wonder why Jimbo is obsessed with encouraging WP participation........ Plus....The talk page on the Psychology Wikia is a laff-riot. This post has been edited by EricBarbour: Tue 15th March 2011, 4:28am |
| carbuncle |
Tue 15th March 2011, 12:18pm
Post
#2
|
![]() Fat Cat ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,601 Joined: Sun 30th Mar 2008, 4:48pm Member No.: 5,544 |
I enjoyed this part of the WP bio of Rubin created by Jokestress/Andrea James:
QUOTE Rubin was listed as having died in 1997 in the 2001 edition of The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology.[11] Rubin then attributed this error to "the internet" after it had been included in a Wikia profile about him.[12] Although he didn't in fact do that, it fits James' story better. Rubin's humorous New York Times oped piece should be added to the introductory reading list here. |
| lilburne |
Tue 15th March 2011, 12:41pm
Post
#3
|
![]() Chameleon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 890 Joined: Thu 17th Jun 2010, 11:42am Member No.: 21,803 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
The self-serving Boing Boing post sums it up well. QUOTE Psychology Wiki, like the unrelated Wikipedia project, requires a reliable source for any disputed fact, but that is one of those things that's very hard for people outside of wiki-world to understand. Wikipedia's policy is verifiability, not truth. This simple rule is a cornerstone policy, one of the five pillars. Well, Andrea, they HAD a "verifiable fact". The "fact" said that Rubin died in 1997. To be fair they also had the fact that in 1997 he was Zick. This post has been edited by lilburne: Tue 15th March 2011, 12:41pm |
| Gruntled |
Fri 18th March 2011, 3:33pm
Post
#4
|
|
Quite an unusual member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: On Vacation Posts: 222 Joined: Tue 2nd Feb 2010, 12:23pm Member No.: 16,954 |
Ah well, it could have been worse. Suppose WP had wrongly had the date of death for (to pick something at random) a notable skater because someone had found a death notice for someone else with the same name.
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd 5 13, 5:15am |