The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Discussions in this subforum are hidden from search engines.

However, they are not hidden from automobile engines, including the newer, more "environmentally-friendly" electric and hybrid engines. Also, please note that this subforum is meant to be used for discussion of the actual biographical articles themselves; more generalized discussions of BLP policy should be posted in the General Discussion or Bureaucracy forums.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Dead lawyer NOT DEAD, Andrea James strikes again
EricBarbour
post Tue 15th March 2011, 4:19am
Post #1


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



The self-serving Boing Boing post sums it up well.

QUOTE
Psychology Wiki, like the unrelated Wikipedia project, requires a reliable source for any disputed fact, but that is one of those things that's very hard for people outside of wiki-world to understand. Wikipedia's policy is verifiability, not truth. This simple rule is a cornerstone policy, one of the five pillars.


Well, Andrea, they HAD a "verifiable fact". The "fact" said that Rubin died in 1997.

Instead of fixing an error in a printed book, Wikia chose to repeat an error. That's the major
problem with Wikia, and by extension Wikipedia: "facts" are difficult to challenge, esp. when
they are wrong. Try to correct it, and some officious bastard comes along and re-creates
falsehood. And yet, she still loves WP, after having a Wikia-induced headache.

Have I pointed out a few of the cases of Wikia material ending up on WP and vice versa?
Here ya go, cut-pasted from the "private area":
QUOTE

There's a Wikia wiki dedicated to Azumanga Daioh.
There's a Wikia wiki about One Piece.
There's a Wikia wiki about K-On.
There's a massive Wikia wiki about Babylon 5.
And there's a monstrous Wikia wiki about Buffy.

Much of the content is cut-pasted from or to Wikipedia.
The difference: Jimbo makes money from the Wikia versions, of course!

And people wonder why Jimbo is obsessed with encouraging WP participation........


Plus....The talk page on the Psychology Wikia is a laff-riot.

This post has been edited by EricBarbour: Tue 15th March 2011, 4:28am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carbuncle
post Tue 15th March 2011, 12:18pm
Post #2


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,601
Joined: Sun 30th Mar 2008, 4:48pm
Member No.: 5,544



I enjoyed this part of the WP bio of Rubin created by Jokestress/Andrea James:
QUOTE
Rubin was listed as having died in 1997 in the 2001 edition of The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology.[11] Rubin then attributed this error to "the internet" after it had been included in a Wikia profile about him.[12]
Although he didn't in fact do that, it fits James' story better.

Rubin's humorous New York Times oped piece should be added to the introductory reading list here.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lilburne
post Tue 15th March 2011, 12:41pm
Post #3


Chameleon
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 890
Joined: Thu 17th Jun 2010, 11:42am
Member No.: 21,803

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 15th March 2011, 4:19am) *

The self-serving Boing Boing post sums it up well.

QUOTE
Psychology Wiki, like the unrelated Wikipedia project, requires a reliable source for any disputed fact, but that is one of those things that's very hard for people outside of wiki-world to understand. Wikipedia's policy is verifiability, not truth. This simple rule is a cornerstone policy, one of the five pillars.


Well, Andrea, they HAD a "verifiable fact". The "fact" said that Rubin died in 1997.




To be fair they also had the fact that in 1997 he was Zick.

This post has been edited by lilburne: Tue 15th March 2011, 12:41pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gruntled
post Fri 18th March 2011, 3:33pm
Post #4


Quite an unusual member
***

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue 2nd Feb 2010, 12:23pm
Member No.: 16,954



Ah well, it could have been worse. Suppose WP had wrongly had the date of death for (to pick something at random) a notable skater because someone had found a death notice for someone else with the same name.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd 5 13, 5:15am