Reporting of lolicon images on Wikimedia Commons Options

[Tarc]

Reporting of lolicon images on Wikimedia Commons (T-H-L-K-D)

Perhaps a legitimate article on the topic could be made, but this one reads like reflexive loli-defense by the Wikipe-tan regulars.

This post has been edited by Tarc: Mon 21st March 2011, 1:20pm

[Silver seren]

I actually wasn't referring to this article at all or about the images in question, I was referring to Sanger's comments at an old Content Noticeboard discussion (like I said in my last post) about the Cock and ball torture article, where it was decided to turn it into a disambiguation page between the band and sexual practice, which in turn also coincidentally serves as an article defense so the sexual practice article isn't the first thing you end up going to and being hit in the eyes with images that, while highly relevant to the article, may not be the subject in question.

Sanger was attempting to use the discussion to accuse the Foundation of violating its for children stance.

That's what my previous post was about.

P.S. I think it's quite obvious that the images in question were not child porn or the FBI would have actually done something. They disregarded Sanger's idiotic claims just like Wikipedia did. The only ones that took Sanger seriously was Fox News and...well, that speaks for itself.

P.P.S. I do not and will never own a fursuit.