 Most crappy important article |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Doc glasgow |
 Tue 22nd March 2011, 10:18pm
Post
#1
|
 Wikipedia:The Sump of All Human Knowledge  Group: Regulars Posts: 1,138 Joined: Sat 1st Apr 2006, 10:39pm From: at home Member No.: 90 WP user page - talk check - contribs  |
Muammar Gaddafi is an evil dictator. But even evil dictators don't deserve such shit wiki-bios.
It got me wondering - what's the most crappy article on a really important core topic that anyone can find on Wikipedia? Is the Gaddafi bio just bad because he's controversial. |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| Eva Destruction |
Fri 25th March 2011, 6:08pm
Post
#2
|
 Fat Cat Group: Regulars Posts: 1,735 Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm Member No.: 3,301 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
QUOTE(Doc glasgow @ Tue 22nd March 2011, 10:18pm)  It got me wondering - what's the most crappy article on a really important core topic that anyone can find on Wikipedia? Is the Gaddafi bio just bad because he's controversial. Information technology. No contest. |
|
|
|
| Silver seren |
Fri 25th March 2011, 6:13pm
Post
#3
|
 Senior Member Group: Contributors Posts: 470 Joined: Thu 30th Dec 2010, 2:09pm Member No.: 36,940 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Fri 25th March 2011, 6:08pm) QUOTE(Doc glasgow @ Tue 22nd March 2011, 10:18pm) It got me wondering - what's the most crappy article on a really important core topic that anyone can find on Wikipedia? Is the Gaddafi bio just bad because he's controversial. Information technology. No contest. Agreed, wow. IT is one of the fastest growing fields in the world and this article is, like, three paragraphs. |
|
|
|
| Eva Destruction |
Fri 25th March 2011, 6:44pm
Post
#4
|
|
Fat Cat Group: Regulars Posts: 1,735 Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm Member No.: 3,301 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
QUOTE(Silver seren @ Fri 25th March 2011, 6:13pm) Agreed, wow. IT is one of the fastest growing fields in the world and this article is, like, three paragraphs. Until Malleus cleaned out the worst of the shit, it used to be even worse. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Doc glasgow Most crappy important article Tue 22nd March 2011, 10:18pm
Malleus That's an interesting question, but wp article... Tue 22nd March 2011, 10:51pm
Doc glasgow
That's an interesting question, but wp articl... Tue 22nd March 2011, 10:57pm Emperor WWII. It's a top 20 article, and has major er... Tue 22nd March 2011, 11:46pm thekohser Doc, if you can define "importance" for ... Tue 22nd March 2011, 11:57pm Doc glasgow
Doc, if you can define "importance" for... Wed 23rd March 2011, 12:22am EricBarbour WP articles on major corporations tend to be eithe... Wed 23rd March 2011, 1:04am Versa I think that the article on asshole http://en.wiki... Wed 23rd March 2011, 4:02am melloden They already made a list at this page. So just go ... Wed 23rd March 2011, 4:12am Milton Roe
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entertainment]E... Wed 23rd March 2011, 5:13am thekohser
Go ahead, try any Fortune 500 firm's name.
I... Wed 23rd March 2011, 2:15pm Cock-up-over-conspiracy [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_Gaddafi]... Wed 23rd March 2011, 3:16pm Milton Roe
It is a wonder how my generation ever worked out ... Wed 23rd March 2011, 8:13pm Peter Damian
[quote name='Cock-up-over-conspira... Wed 23rd March 2011, 8:20pm melloden
This sort of thing. [url=http://www.nlm.nih.gov/... Wed 23rd March 2011, 9:11pm EricBarbour Texas Towers is a miserable excuse for an article.... Wed 23rd March 2011, 8:27pm Eva Destruction Honorable mention for Factory as well. Fri 25th March 2011, 6:50pm |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st 5 13, 4:27pm |