Dumb RFA oppose, FAIL Options Rating

[Shalom]

RFA never fails to produce FAILs. Here's the latest specimen of idiocy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...CenturyDriver_2

"Also, in the past 27 months, candidate has averaged a little over 84 edits a month, and not the 100 they stated. ArcAngel (talk) ) 19:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)"

For this you're opposing? The fellow (BuickCenturyDriver, famous for the password hacking incident which he references in Q3) has been editing 3 years now, and you're nitpicking how many edits per month? Actually, I might have noted it myself, but I would have clarified that I wasn't opposing on the basis of 1/6 fewer edits per month than stated. 100 is approximately right. Seriously, folks, lighten up. Or find something more useful to do.

[chrisoff]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=426638066

"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus

Dumb and dumber. Old fool!

This post has been edited by chrisoff: Fri 29th April 2011, 11:16pm

[Malleus]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=426638066

"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus

Dumb and dumber. Old fool!

Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot? Are you claiming that I'm lying?

This post has been edited by Malleus: Fri 29th April 2011, 11:22pm

[powercorrupts]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=426638066

"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus

Dumb and dumber. Old fool!

Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot? Are you claiming that I'm lying?

I'll take that up. This isn't even Wikipedia, although that hardly seems to effect the ridiculous confidence of nuts like you in churning up hideously irony-free shite like "Are you claiming that I'm lying?".

Based upon your consistent behavioural patterns, it is absolutely impossible to believe you are (or even "have been” - sigh upon WP sigh) a psychologist who has worked in mental institutions. Even applying that ridiculous 'professional machismo' quotient that WPosers like you hang their invisible hats on, and (before anyone mentions it) the old adage about 'crankiness' in the personality-related professions too.

What you are Malleus is a typical Wikipego who thinks that 'anything goes' for the 'cause' in the great bare knuckle fight that is Wikipedia. Your only qualification is that you are an persistently arrogant nob who can't accept you can ever be wrong about anything. What else do you need? All that matters to maladjusts like you are how many numbers are in your clan, and their particular powers and support they have behind them. All the computer tactical game analogies are spot on.

I'm not sure you are even British, but I am sure that you and Rod would make a lovely couple. You share so much in common.

[Malleus]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=426638066

"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus

Dumb and dumber. Old fool!

Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot? Are you claiming that I'm lying?

I'll take that up. This isn't even Wikipedia, although that hardly seems to effect the ridiculous confidence of nuts like you in churning up hideously irony-free shite like "Are you claiming that I'm lying?".

Based upon your consistent behavioural patterns, it is absolutely impossible to believe you are (or even "have been” - sigh upon WP sigh) a psychologist who has worked in mental institutions. Even applying that ridiculous 'professional machismo' quotient that WPosers like you hang their invisible hats on, and (before anyone mentions it) the old adage about 'crankiness' in the personality-related professions too.

What you are Malleus is a typical Wikipego who thinks that 'anything goes' for the 'cause' in the great bare knuckle fight that is Wikipedia. Your only qualification is that you are an persistently arrogant nob who can't accept you can ever be wrong about anything. What else do you need? All that matters to maladjusts like you are how many numbers are in your clan, and their particular powers and support they have behind them. All the computer tactical game analogies are spot on.

I'm not sure you are even British, but I am sure that you and Rod would make a lovely couple. You share so much in common.

You're quite right, of course, how perceptive of you. I'm actually an Albanian builder currently working in Poland.

[Milton Roe]

Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot?

The prime dictim of the internet: "When you argue with a fool, chances are he is doing just the same."

[powercorrupts]

Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot?

The prime dictim of the internet: "When you argue with a fool, chances are he is doing just the same."

Well, Mallius wrote that, so you shouldn't really quote it as me.

But I think I get your point - although, frankly, I was simply having a dig. I can't see how he can make an argument of it. (and to be fair, he hasn't.)