The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> 

This forum is populated by RSS feeds from various news sources. Members may start topics here and reply to them, but please limit new topics to links to actual news stories. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to the Wikipedia:Glossary.

For accurate information about the "Wikipedia vs. Britannica" study by Nature, please read this.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Wikipedia boss Jimmy Wales criticises injunctions - Myjoyonline.com
Newsfeed
post Thu 12th May 2011, 3:08pm
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm
Member No.: 2,885



[url="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNETy6kg_7Vz4OAX8jEOJvZfiqd7HA&url=http://news.myjoyonline.com/international/201105/65664.asp"][img]http://nt3.ggpht.com/news/tbn/v7SbdXvT5eO6cM/6.jpg[/img]
Myjoyonline.com[/url]
<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />[b]Wikipedia boss Jimmy Wales criticises injunctions[/b]
Myjoyonline.com
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has waded into the debate over super-injunctions, saying current privacy laws are a “human rights violation”. The online encyclopaedia has fallen foul of UK privacy law in recent weeks, with details about those using ...



View the article
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Thu 12th May 2011, 4:17pm
Post #2


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Thu 12th May 2011, 8:08am) *

Wikipedia boss Jimmy Wales criticises injunctions[/url]
View the article


QUOTE

Mr. Wales said his personal view was that privacy laws were "grave injustices and human rights violations”.

“They should be done away with as quickly as possible. There should be no law constraining people from publishing legally obtained, factual information,” he said.

Exceptions to this would be information that was life-threatening, such as troop movements.

“But we aren't talking about that. This is embarrassing facts about politicians and celebrities”.


Which is why Wikipedia contains all publicly available information about Carolyn Doran.

And as for Jimbo, what about that trailor park home and that love-child? Would it be excessively POV to title that last header in his BLP something like

== Sperm theft 2010 ==

Or maybe just

== JimboLeaks ==





User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 6 13, 3:30pm