The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Poor Malleus, he wants to run and hide, Don't you just feel bad for him?
NuclearWarfare
post Fri 24th June 2011, 11:29am
Post #41


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 382
Joined: Tue 23rd Dec 2008, 10:24pm
Member No.: 9,506

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Silver seren @ Fri 24th June 2011, 11:23am) *

Beyond this leaked email conversation, is there any proof on-wiki that they are one and the same? Any correlating edits or comments?

I think he admitted it onwiki or here. It's also not against the sockpuppetry policy.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
powercorrupts
post Fri 24th June 2011, 11:34am
Post #42


.
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 716
Joined: Fri 27th Jun 2008, 10:27pm
Member No.: 6,776



QUOTE(chrisoff @ Fri 24th June 2011, 10:58am) *

QUOTE(Silver seren @ Fri 24th June 2011, 2:00am) *

... I mean about Malleus)

Has he been using, essentially, a sockpuppet account under William Leadford for the past 14 months? While continuing to edit under Malleus Fatuorum? Is that what has happened?


Well, yes. Malleus has been sockpuppeting.

And also under Numez99 as recently as a year ago.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=356639508

And maybe others? Who knows? and many may be stale. Will the usual sockpuppet chasers jump on their horse, or is Malleus too big to fail? unsure.gif


Look, don't be such a silly child Chrisoff. (or, if you are a child, try and be at least reasonably accurate in adult company will you). Sockpuppets edit over the same areas to influence the outcome. Is there evidence he's actually done that? You need evidence to make that kind of claim. With Nunez99 he seemed to just accidentally edit his Malleus page (or deliberate, as he says here.)

This is all about secondary or replacement accounts. The leak has definitely effected Malleus' freedom of action, even though he's played it down on Wikipedia.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lilburne
post Fri 24th June 2011, 12:32pm
Post #43


Chameleon
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 890
Joined: Thu 17th Jun 2010, 11:42am
Member No.: 21,803

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Silver seren @ Fri 24th June 2011, 10:53am) *

That doesn't seem to answer my question about Malleus. mellow.gif


The Stasi protected their informants especially when they had to go undercover.

HTHs
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Fri 24th June 2011, 12:54pm
Post #44


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(chrisoff @ Fri 24th June 2011, 5:58am) *
Will the usual sockpuppet chasers jump on their horse...


I hope not...my back is killing me from those jokers. hrmph.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ComeGetMe
post Wed 29th June 2011, 2:47pm
Post #45


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat 12th Jul 2008, 7:54pm
Member No.: 7,032



QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Thu 23rd June 2011, 6:22pm) *

QUOTE(Malleus @ Thu 23rd June 2011, 1:19pm) *

You forgot Jimbo Wales.


Well, the person who tipped Malley off on this leak used an Australian IP. That puts Doc Liber and JV on the hot seat. But the tip-off includes a slam at Iridescent, which could be a way for Iri to throw off attention from him.

This really looks like a job for Tiptoety -- we need a good faux-cop to solve the case. ermm.gif

An address that traces back to Melbourne ... hmmmm ....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th 5 13, 5:56pm