| |
|
  |
Ask the Leaker, Go ask Malice, I think he'll know |
|
|
| Craftyminion |
Mon 27th June 2011, 8:32pm
|
Neophyte
Group: Contributors
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon 7th Sep 2009, 2:57pm
Member No.: 13,484
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
Malice,
Thank you muchly for the dish on Ottava the Odious. Greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Peter Damian |
Mon 27th June 2011, 10:09pm
|

I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
        
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(The Joy @ Mon 27th June 2011, 9:00pm)  I posted this in another thread, but that post got lost.
Anything about Poetlister/Quillercouch during:
September 5-15, 2008?
October 24, 2010?
I second that. This is crucial to understanding the other two threads I have been banging on about. Possibly before that, as FT2 issued a report in August 2008. The people involved (not all of them Arbcom) were Sam Korn (=Smoddy), James Forrester, Jpgordon, Kirill Lokshin (overview), Sam Blacketer at enwiki arbcom or ex-arbs. Checkusers/crats Thatcher, Jayvdb, Rlevse and WJBscribe. Checkuser Aphaia. Stewards Spacebirdy to the extent needed to justify a cross wiki checkuser, Lar to the extent needed to endorse that we must handled it privately if it comes up on-wiki, Dungodung to the point of agreement to review, and Cary, Jimmy Wales and Jay Walsh at Office. Oh yes and Coren http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?titl...4&oldid=1173766 naturally. Goodness and our friend Lar as well http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?titl...t&oldid=1181370 who mentions the famous email (presumably that one, anyway). QUOTE :I meant to add that I think FT2 has done a fairly reasonable job in not rushing to judgment and presenting the facts in a manner that doesn't pillory anyone, and allows the individual to just go away. http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?titl...5&oldid=1168873Like approaching the HR department of the sockpuppet's firm? Does this just allow the individual to go away? (Cary Bass, unlike Jimbo, did acknowledge seeing the 13 Sep email). This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Mon 27th June 2011, 10:20pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wikipeek |
Tue 28th June 2011, 8:20pm
|
Neophyte
Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon 27th Jun 2011, 7:57pm
Member No.: 58,266

|
Anything useful in functionaries-en to avoid CU? Always wondered if CU reveals account creation IP. Some of my socks with 0 edits were catched.
This post has been edited by Wikipeek: Tue 28th June 2011, 10:57pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
| melloden |
Wed 29th June 2011, 1:59am
|

.
   
Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue 30th Nov 2010, 4:43pm
Member No.: 34,482

|
QUOTE(melloden @ Wed 29th June 2011, 1:38am)  QUOTE(Wikipeek @ Tue 28th June 2011, 8:20pm)  Anything useful in functionaries-en to avoid CU? Always wondered if CU reveals account creation IP. Some of my socks with 0 edits were catched.
It does. Just make an account when on vacation or a friend's computer or just a different browser and operating system, and wait three months before using it at home. Also, I'd like to see some leaks regarding how they handle pedophiles. One that comes to mind is Thesevenseas - how exactly does ArbCom figure these things out, and how fast does it take for the block? Edit: Oops, I just saw this was leaked earlier. Anything else on dealing with pedos? Also, anything about Cirt or Mattisse?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| gomi |
Wed 29th June 2011, 4:09am
|
Member
       
Group: Members
Posts: 3,022
Joined: Fri 17th Nov 2006, 6:38pm
Member No.: 565

|
QUOTE(Wikipeek @ Tue 28th June 2011, 1:20pm)  Always wondered if CU reveals account creation IP. Some of my socks with 0 edits were catched. Well-known for ages. The answer is "yes", though the word you are looking for is "caught". Also, CU Wiki retains records on actual or suspected sockpuppets indefinitely, so if you're a sock, never re-use an IP. If someone else re-uses the IP and tickles a checkuser's interest, they are likely to be banned, regardless of guilt. I've now collected a list of at least 20 "sockpuppets" that I had nothing to do with. Wikipedia doesn't care, they want to be seen as fighting the enemies of the Wiki.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SpiderAndWeb |
Wed 29th June 2011, 4:10am
|
Junior Member
 
Group: Contributors
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue 28th Jun 2011, 5:02pm
Member No.: 58,319

|
QUOTE There are aspect to Casliber's resignation and John Vandenberg's resignation that were not made public. There were aspects to Kirill's resignation last year, and also Coren's resignation, that were not made public. If these "aspects" are along the lines of BlackmailedArb's, say no more. If, on the other hand, there is a pattern of the Committee whitewashing the incompetence or misconduct of fellow arbs, that is by far the information I'm most interested in seeing leaked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| melloden |
Wed 29th June 2011, 5:01am
|

.
   
Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue 30th Nov 2010, 4:43pm
Member No.: 34,482

|
QUOTE(SpiderAndWeb @ Wed 29th June 2011, 4:10am)  QUOTE There are aspect to Casliber's resignation and John Vandenberg's resignation that were not made public. There were aspects to Kirill's resignation last year, and also Coren's resignation, that were not made public. If these "aspects" are along the lines of BlackmailedArb's, say no more. If, on the other hand, there is a pattern of the Committee whitewashing the incompetence or misconduct of fellow arbs, that is by far the information I'm most interested in seeing leaked. Not sure if these were already leaked, but can someone either point me to the relevant leak thread or give me a tl;dr summary on this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |