The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Wikipedia Offers Poor Readability! - French Tribune
Newsfeed
post Sat 17th September 2011, 12:49pm
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm
Member No.: 2,885




<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />[b]Wikipedia Offers Poor Readability![/b]
French Tribune
There would hardly be any net savvy who has not heard of the name Wikipedia, but does the name still brings the same confidence in the mind of readers is a huge question in itself. Wikipedia being editable by anyone make it more under doubts that ...

and more »

View the article
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 2)
thekohser
post Sat 17th September 2011, 8:34pm
Post #2


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE
"...but does the name still brings the same confidence in the mind of readers is a huge question in itself."


Surely, the end of grammar in news media has fully arrived.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Sat 17th September 2011, 11:04pm
Post #3


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Sat 17th September 2011, 1:34pm) *

QUOTE
"...but does the name still brings the same confidence in the mind of readers is a huge question in itself."
Surely, the end of grammar in news media has fully arrived.

It looks as if it was translated from French to English, using Google Translate or somesuch.

That's the future of the Internet generally--computers talking to other computers, unintelligibly.
Using human languages, despite the material never being read by humans.

That's what the Interlingua Wikipedia (8,578 articles)
and the Esperanto Wikipedia (152,381 articles)
and the Volapük Wikipedia (118,897 articles) are:
Wikipedias generated by bots, and never actually read by anybody,
except maybe a few deeply crazy hobbyists. Plus, they are helpful bits of
misinformation that help to attract cash donors, by making Wikipedia
look bigger and more important than it really is.


This post has been edited by EricBarbour: Sat 17th September 2011, 11:20pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th 5 13, 5:31am