The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Why are pornstars more notable than scientists on Wikipedia?
mbz1
post Fri 9th December 2011, 11:58pm
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 10:50pm
Member No.: 25,791



Not sure, if this was discussed here. If it was, please delete the topic.
If not, maybe worth taking a look
QUOTE
Despite my rants I understand the challenges that will likely show up as comments on this blogpost. I understand that I will be pointed to WP:COI and WP:Notability. I do not get to set the rules, I need to follow them as I am a small part of a very important community of crowdsourced improvement. But, overall, I remain surprised at how there appears to be so much diligence looking at the articles of scientists rather than those of pornstars. I think scientists are generally involved in very notable activities that generally distinguish them from the bulk of the population. I think pornstars are involved in activities that are not particularly notable as the bulk of the population will do them at some point in their life….well, not ALL activities that pornstars do I’m sure…..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Sat 10th December 2011, 12:34pm
Post #2


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



Antony Williams gets little sympathy from me:
QUOTE
I’m a BIG Wikipedia fan. It is one of my favorite sites, our 9 year old twins have spent many hours on the site with me, and I have personally spent a lot of time, including Christmas, curating chemistry on Wikipedia. I like what Wikipedia has achieved, have willingly contributed articles...


So, get back to your beloved Wikipedia and fix it, Tony.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Sat 10th December 2011, 12:48pm
Post #3


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



I left a couple of comments that are real whoppers. I don't know if Tony will "moderate" them through to publication, though. We'll see. (I broke Godwin's Law on one of them.)

In response to a commenter who was dropping all kinds of links to Wikia and singing Wikia's praises:
QUOTE
Well of course you’re excited about Wikia. That’s Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales’ whole plan. Lure you in with Wikipedia, then follow any of the 28,000+ links from Wikipedia to his $14-million commercial enterprise, Wikia, and get you hooked somewhere where you’ll be exposed to advertising — 100% of whose profits go back to Wikia. Thank you for all of your hard work “volunteering” for a privately-financed corporation. We’ll be looking for you to volunteer some time “greeting” at Wal-Mart and helping BP to clean up any unfortunate oil spills. I hear the seagull-washing station can feel really rewarding — you’re helping animals!
-- Gregory Kohs


And in response to Tony's blog overall:
QUOTE
Tony, my apologies, but you get little sympathy from me. Your continued participation in Wikipedia makes you as much a part of the problem you describe as any of the other Wikipediots. The entire system is flawed and corrupt. It’s like you’re in 1940 Germany, a civil engineer for the highway system, saying that while you are trying your best to make the German autobahn the best road transportation system in the world, there’s something bugging you about the sounds you sometimes hear over by that relocation center near Dachau.

Oh, and you didn’t capitalize Pornstar Pets. It’s a proper noun.
--Gregory Kohs


This post has been edited by thekohser: Sat 10th December 2011, 12:51pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Sat 10th December 2011, 10:06pm
Post #4


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



biggrin.gif

a) if I could find an email for Dr. Williams, I'd try to explain to him why he's so misguided about WP.

b) he's been editing his own BLP......I have to put this in the book club and the wiki. Blatant, stupid activity. He should know better.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Fusion
post Sat 10th December 2011, 10:29pm
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue 29th Nov 2011, 12:40pm
Member No.: 71,526



QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sat 10th December 2011, 10:06pm) *

biggrin.gif

a) if I could find an email for Dr. Williams, I'd try to explain to him why he's so misguided about WP.

b) he's been editing his own BLP......I have to put this in the book club and the wiki. Blatant, stupid activity. He should know better.

He's a person of some importance - vice-president of the Royal Society of Chemistry and author of loads of peer-reviewed publications. So he must meet general notability guidelines.

http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/antony-williams/

That link gives his contact details as

www.chemconnector.com/chemunicating

but I can't get it to work. His snailmail address is

904 Tamaras Circle, Wake Forest, North Carolina, United States

http://www.slideshare.net/AntonyWilliams
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Web Fred
post Sat 7th January 2012, 2:05pm
Post #6


Pervert & Swinger
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat 13th Feb 2010, 3:25pm
From: Manchester, UK
Member No.: 17,141

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



The answer to the thread title is very easy... 'cos they've got bigger dicks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th 11 14, 10:53pm