The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> 

This forum is populated by RSS feeds from various news sources. Members may start topics here and reply to them, but please limit new topics to links to actual news stories. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to the Wikipedia:Glossary.

For accurate information about the "Wikipedia vs. Britannica" study by Nature, please read this.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Wikipedia Editor William Beutler - C-SPAN
Newsfeed
post Sun 1st January 2012, 7:12am
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm
Member No.: 2,885



[url="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNEMZa0EIyZD91AFnrxYUIAkrC69AA&url=http://www.c-span.org/Events/Wikipedia-Editor-William-Beutler/10737426693/"][img]http://nt0.ggpht.com/news/tbn/dO1m-FtkPcl0OM/6.jpg[/img]
C-SPAN[/url]
<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />[b]Wikipedia Editor William Beutler[/b]
C-SPAN
This week on Q&A, William Beutler, the creator and editor of TheWikipedian.net, a blog designed to explain Wikipedia to the non user. Beutler describes his role as an editor, commentator and consultant for the Wikipedia website. ...



View the article
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Sun 1st January 2012, 6:48pm
Post #2


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE
Beutler describes his role as an editor, commentator and consultant for the Wikipedia website.


That suggests "paid" consultant. Has Beutler collected income from the WMF? I think they rather should have said, "editor, commentator, and consultant to clients about the Wikipedia website".

As a reminder, Beutler helped construct this litany of truths about Wikipedia that he framed up as "myths".

Also, Beutler works for New Media Strategies, which is the PR firm that helps out Koch Industries on the Internet, and which contributes 80% of the edits to Wikipedia's article about New Media Strategies.

Anyhow, he'll be on C-SPAN at 8:00 PM tonight.

This post has been edited by thekohser: Sun 1st January 2012, 6:59pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Wed 4th January 2012, 4:48am
Post #3


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



Did anyone else catch this? I thought that Beutler did a rather nice job, in all. Of course, still a bit too much in awe of Wikipedia's accomplishments, but at least guided C-SPAN founder Brian Lamb through the dangers of misinformation on Wikipedia.

One thing that did come out -- Lamb noted that the only reason he knew Beutler previously was that Beutler had been invited a few years ago to consult C-SPAN on the subject of Wikipedia. I wonder if that was a paid gig. It sounded like it.

Anyway, I applaud C-SPAN for addressing Wikipedia in a way that is not the usual PBS-style sucking up to Jimbo and Sue, accepting every laudatory claim at face value.

This post has been edited by thekohser: Wed 4th January 2012, 5:25am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Fri 6th January 2012, 4:55am
Post #4


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



Beutler now has Orange Mike among his enemies. It seems to be that only the clinically insane would think that Beutler's version of Cracker Barrel is worse than the earlier Wikipedia version of it. But then, this is Wikipedia, where the clinically insane tend to rule the roost. This won't turn out well.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd 5 13, 9:23am