The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article CandidatesFeatured Article ReviewArticles for DeletionDeletion Review

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Great Soviet Encyclopedia versus Wikipedia
Mister Die
post Tue 31st January 2012, 10:37am
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun 29th Jan 2012, 11:32pm
Member No.: 75,644

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Here's a fun game, let's compare the Great Soviet Encyclopedia with everyone's favorite self-proclaimed 'encyclopedia' that anyone can edit, Wikipedia!
QUOTE
Masturbation

(also onanism), a surrogate form of sexual satisfaction in which the erogenous zones—most often the genital organs—are artificially stimulated for the purpose of producing orgasm. Masturbation is widespread in the animal world. Most often in humans it is practiced at the age of puberty and no longer after a sex life is established. It is associated principally with sociosexual disharmony, which is caused by an awakening of sexuality before the individual is socially mature. The negative effects of masturbation are caused primarily by fear of consequences and can lead to neurosis.

G. S. VASIL’CHENKO


Wikipedia, part of the second opening paragraph:
QUOTE
There have been masturbation marathons and health service slogans such as "an orgasm a day keeps the doctor away"
Nuff said.

You can search for English-language GSE articles here: http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/

Articles in the Soviet encyclopedia can have picky names, e.g. it'll recognize "Stalin, Josef Vissarionovich" but not "Stalin, Joseph" or what have you.

Here's a nice start:

GSE: http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/encyclopedia (you'll have to scroll down a bit to see the Soviet article)
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia

And another:
GSE: http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com...truction+of+the
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstructio...e_United_States

Also by "versus" I don't mean "in terms of factual information" or what have you (since obviously there will be a lot of debate on that front.) I mean as actual articles trying to be encyclopedic, which means being reasonably summarized, well-written and explanatory. Soviet articles which show their age (e.g. computer) probably don't count either.

This post has been edited by Mister Die: Tue 31st January 2012, 11:23am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Web Fred
post Tue 31st January 2012, 10:53am
Post #2


Pervert & Swinger
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat 13th Feb 2010, 3:25pm
From: Manchester, UK
Member No.: 17,141

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



So in other words, if you're Russian then don't wank.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lilburne
post Tue 31st January 2012, 10:59am
Post #3


Chameleon
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 890
Joined: Thu 17th Jun 2010, 11:42am
Member No.: 21,803

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Tue 31st January 2012, 10:53am) *

So in other words, if you're Russian then don't wank.


But those in the North West of England should embrace it as a part of a healthy life style. If you can't compete in the Great North Run there is always the Mancunian wankathon.

This post has been edited by lilburne: Tue 31st January 2012, 10:59am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mister Die
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 9:40am
Post #4


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun 29th Jan 2012, 11:32pm
Member No.: 75,644

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Well, I can say with confidence that their article on Turkmenistan is longer and more descriptive:

http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com...2c+Turkmenistan
(articles on Soviet Socialist Republics in the GSE are treated similarly to independent countries like Great Britain or Zaire, with whole histories from the polity itself to literature and education, to economics, philosophy where acceptable, etc.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkmenistan

Then again Turkmen were far more likely to read the former. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by Mister Die: Thu 2nd February 2012, 9:44am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 6 13, 7:57am