The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article CandidatesFeatured Article ReviewArticles for DeletionDeletion Review

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Dici de omni
Peter Damian
post Sat 4th February 2012, 1:14pm
Post #1


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



A new article http://www.logicmuseum.com/wiki/Dici_de_omni in the Logic Museum today on the axiom of dici de omni, which I also discuss here http://ocham.blogspot.com/2012/02/dici-de-omni.html . The corresponding Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=425145702 is seriously deficient and inaccurate. The irony, as I note, is that Wikipedia will be unable to link to the Logic Museum article, because of the current ban on outbound links (although there is currently no corresponding ban for Wikipedia articles that link to Wikia pages such as My Little Pony or Star Trek or Dr Who).

The original Wikipedia article hasn't been updated much since 2009, and was even nominated for deletion in 2008, because some Wikipedian administrator had no idea what it was about.

This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Sat 4th February 2012, 1:20pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Sat 4th February 2012, 8:25pm
Post #2


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,783
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Thu 5th June 2008, 1:02am) *

Someone please tell me, and keep reminding me, that anyone who gets involved with this project is fundamentally insane. thank you.


Dicki De Omni ...

Jon tongue.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mister Die
post Sat 4th February 2012, 8:33pm
Post #3


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun 29th Jan 2012, 11:32pm
Member No.: 75,644

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



This is a case where the Wikipedia article just might look totally neato if actual experts wouldn't ever have to worry about legions of idiots either wanting to delete the article (as you demonstrated) or wanting to alter it for the worse, or simply vandalize it. Instead actual experts almost never edit Wikipedia and thus specialized subjects are generally ignored because "everyone can edit" is not a very good model with few exceptions, like Star Wars or Seinfeld.

This post has been edited by Mister Die: Sat 4th February 2012, 8:34pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th 4 14, 9:34am