The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article CandidatesFeatured Article ReviewArticles for DeletionDeletion Review

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Fisting, Wikipedia not censored etc
Peter Damian
post Sun 5th February 2012, 11:46am
Post #1


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Lots going on here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&action=history with a big fight to add/remove a picture of a man with a fist up his bottom. It's very important to have pictures like these, with spots, poor angle, framing and lighting etc., all so that the evil shadow of 'censorship' shall not fall on Wikipedia.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mister Die
post Sun 5th February 2012, 1:01pm
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun 29th Jan 2012, 11:32pm
Member No.: 75,644

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Well duh, the purpose of every encyclopedia is to explain its subject. Thanks to the internet Wikipedia is unbounded by the problems facing book-based encyclopedias, ergo it can now demonstrate in an accurate and comprehensive manner the whole history, methodology, philosophical basis, and literary and cultural significance of fisting, plus thousands of photographs carefully detailing this historic practice. No doubt in the annals of the archives of Byzantium lay a coin of Michael VII Parapinaces detailing in exquisite detail the practices of fisting in an era far removed from ours. No doubt the popular imagery of the raised fist is but a response of the masses of fisters against the oppressive anti-fist mentality permeating all the whole wide world in the service of the Roman Catholic Church and every other religious/conservative body. Anyone who opposes this and who is neither religious nor conservative is clearly just a dupe for them.

Closely united with the righteous fist movement are the wonderful libertarian heroes who defend Wikipedia from aforementioned oppressive and puritanical forces, valiantly serving forth visual aid for the silent majority of people who really, really need it (like, they might explode, if you get what I'm saying) in articles on all sorts of sexual practices from here to eternity. Without them one will notice just a small step from prohibiting photos of explicit sexual acts to admin-enforced denial of the Holocaust and Wikipedia itself being put directly into the hands of the government of the People's Republic of China.

This post has been edited by Mister Die: Sun 5th February 2012, 1:11pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Sun 5th February 2012, 1:16pm
Post #3


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Mister Die @ Sun 5th February 2012, 1:01pm) *

Well duh, the purpose of every encyclopedia is to explain its subject. Thanks to the internet Wikipedia is unbounded by the problems facing book-based encyclopedias, ergo it can now demonstrate in an accurate and comprehensive manner the whole history, methodology, philosophical basis, and literary and cultural significance of fisting, plus thousands of photographs carefully detailing this historic practice. No doubt in the annals of the archives of Byzantium lay a coin of Michael VII Parapinaces detailing in exquisite detail the practices of fisting in an era far removed from ours. No doubt the popular imagery of the raised fist is but a response of the masses of fisters against the oppressive anti-fist mentality permeating all the whole wide world in the service of the Roman Catholic Church and every other religious/conservative body. Anyone who opposes this and who is neither religious nor conservative is clearly just a dupe for them.

Closely united with the righteous fist movement are the wonderful libertarian heroes who defend Wikipedia from aforementioned oppressive and puritanical forces, valiantly serving forth visual aid for the silent majority of people who really, really need it (like, they might explode, if you get what I'm saying) in articles on all sorts of sexual practices from here to eternity. Without them one will notice just a small step from prohibiting photos of explicit sexual acts to admin-enforced denial of the Holocaust and Wikipedia itself being put directly into the hands of the government of the People's Republic of China.


Have you thought about writing an article on the important topic of Albanian fisting?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mister Die
post Sun 5th February 2012, 1:20pm
Post #4


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun 29th Jan 2012, 11:32pm
Member No.: 75,644

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



I tried reading a book yesterday (via Questia) entitled Women Who Become Men: Albanian Sworn Virgins and I learned more about narcolepsy than anything (to be fair I'm far more interested in history than social studies.) Thankfully the author handled the subject responsibly, so the practice of women "becoming" men (adoption of male dress and traditional responsibilities, vows of celibacy, etc.) in pastoral highlands as a way to escape a highly patriarchal culture and to avenge the death of a male family member wasn't transformed into "the earliest recorded date of transsexual liberation in Albania can be sketched back to..."

If there's ever a Wikipedia article on Transsexualism in Albania I'm quite sure some activist editor will go around proclaiming them as wonderful examples and anyone who dares question such a thing labeled as homophobic, transphobic, bigoted, etc. Sorta how some pedophilia-apologist Wikipedian once made an article about "Albanian pederasty" with content insinuating that every Gheg highlander was ready to start going around buggering children as an integral practice of tribal life.

This post has been edited by Mister Die: Sun 5th February 2012, 1:34pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 8 14, 10:25pm