Donkey punch, The new face of education Options

[HRIP7]

The Donkey punch wars have now spread from English Wikipedia to Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Spanish Wikipedia and God knows what Wikirubbish, with multiple new pages created to prevent the animation from being deleted in Commons.

Commons deletion request

Wikiquote

In Wiktionary, every grammatical form and spelling of the word donkey punch now features a copy of the animation as well ...

Commonists argue that the presence of this animation file created by User:Flyingfeck, on so many "educational" projects, means that it is clearly – you guessed it – educational.

[Web Fred]

You would have thought someone would have done this by now...

[Angela Kennedy]

You would have thought someone would have done this by now...

Or indeed, Jimbo's face image super-imposed on the woman... or would that be 'beyond the pale'?

[Somey]

Or indeed, Jimbo's face image super-imposed on the woman... or would that be 'beyond the pale'?

It should be superimposed on both figures, actually.

However, finding a photo for the female figure for which Jimbo has the right facial expression might be tricky... He's always been good at avoiding the grimace-look when cameras are present.

Anyway...

I don't think we should kid ourselves about what's going on here. Wikipedia is teaching people how to abuse, torture and rape women, and they're not even trying to hide it anymore. Without the image, you could almost argue that the article was comical; with the image, it crosses the line. They never really had any shame to begin with, but now they're actively trying to impose an evil and malicious set of anti-values on society, consequences be damned.

Sorry, but that's just how I feel about this.

[Angela Kennedy]

Or indeed, Jimbo's face image super-imposed on the woman... or would that be 'beyond the pale'?

It should be superimposed on both figures, actually.

However, finding a photo for the female figure for which Jimbo has the right facial expression might be tricky... He's always been good at avoiding the grimace-look when cameras are present.

Anyway...

I don't think we should kid ourselves about what's going on here. Wikipedia is teaching people how to abuse, torture and rape women, and they're not even trying to hide it anymore. Without the image, you could almost argue that the article was comical; with the image, it crosses the line. They never really had any shame to begin with, but now they're actively trying to impose an evil and malicious set of anti-values on society, consequences be damned.

Sorry, but that's just how I feel about this.

Hey Somey, don't apologise. I'm with you on this. I guess I was looking to see how far pleas of 'no censorship' would go if the god-king himself was being donkey-punched in animation parody: Cos I don't know if cunningly linguistic is misogynist, trolling, delightfully ironic, or pushing a pro-wikipedia agenda. Could be any of them.

Or indeed, Jimbo's face image super-imposed on the woman... or would that be 'beyond the pale'?

No, you need Sue Gardner's face on the woman, and then have a debate about whether it's beyond the pale. It might actually be a good metaphor, tbh.

"Calling all vandals..."

Why Sue Gardner?

[Web Fred]

delightfully ironic

There ya go