Image hiding feature on hold ..., Subject to a revote, but no date set ... Options

[HRIP7]

The image filter, part of the WMF board's 2011 Controversial Content Resolution, and designed to bring Wikimedia's handling of adult and other controversial content in line with other top websites, seems to be indefinitely on hold. WMF secretary Phoebe Ayers has advised that

Project development was put on hold over the winter in favor of more pressing priorities, with the agreement of the Board. There is currently an open proposal on the table for the Board to vote on whether to continue with our original request for an image hiding feature; and the ED will take direction from the Board on the matter. We have put that vote off however due to the more time-sensitive and generally all-consuming financial discussions of the past couple of months. ... It seems clear however that regardless, there is both much technical and social work that needs to be done around controversial content that has nothing to do with image hiding, e.g. to improve Commons search, rigorously get model releases, etc. etc.; and also that for any particular technical proposal around image hiding there would be many, many (perhaps insuperable) issues and details to work out.

The question is whether this apparent back-pedalling means that the Foundation should now give up any pretense that it is capable of guiding and directing content development in Wikimedia projects.

This post has been edited by HRIP7: Mon 5th March 2012, 5:28am

[lilburne]

scuppered

[dogbiscuit]

scuppered

And Jimbo's talk page is full of "supervise your children properly, it's not our problem." or "porn is good for you". It is amazing how Wikipedia keeps proving its critics right and yet the real world falls for Jimbo's spin. Jimbo's problem is that you can only say "We are doing something about it" for so long before eventually even the public will twig that they've been had - and the press really hate being embarrassed by falling for the spin and they'll do him over when they see the opportunity for the biggest fall.

Charity leeching money from the public for who knows what + porn site + defamation + misleading politicians = heading for a big fall.

WMF are in danger of giving Fox News a good name.