The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Wikipedia's confused description of LRA, Inspiring idiotic and lazy commentary
iii
post Wed 7th March 2012, 5:26pm
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed 19th Jan 2011, 12:39am
Member No.: 38,992



From Foreign Affairs:

QUOTE
The reactions to Obama's recent statement underscore how little Americans -- journalists included -- know about the United States' involvement in Uganda. In the rush to say something, newspapers and television shows seem to have largely based their material on the somewhat confused Wikipedia entry on the LRA. That may be where the conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh found what he called the "Lord's Resistance Army objectives," which appear on the site and which he used in a bizarre defense of Kony's group on U.S. television. (His apparently supposed that the LRA is a group of Christians fighting Muslims in Sudan.)


Wikipedia focuses primarily on the cultic aspects of the LRA rather than the geopolitical realities of the conflict leading to a recasting of this horrible situation in terms of US culture wars. Way to go, Wikipedia!

This post has been edited by iii: Wed 7th March 2012, 5:27pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lilburne
post Wed 7th March 2012, 8:24pm
Post #2


Chameleon
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 890
Joined: Thu 17th Jun 2010, 11:42am
Member No.: 21,803

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Why did Rush Limbaugh NOT go to Vietnam?


Anal cysts apparently.
http://www.snopes.com/military/limbaugh.asp
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
melloden
post Wed 7th March 2012, 10:34pm
Post #3


.
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue 30th Nov 2010, 4:43pm
Member No.: 34,482



QUOTE(iii @ Wed 7th March 2012, 5:26pm) *

Wikipedia focuses primarily on the cultic aspects of the LRA rather than the geopolitical realities of the conflict leading to a recasting of this horrible situation in terms of US culture wars. Way to go, Wikipedia!

It's written by 20-something nerdy white males. What other perspective do you expect?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mister Die
post Fri 9th March 2012, 11:29pm
Post #4


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun 29th Jan 2012, 11:32pm
Member No.: 75,644

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE
That may be where the conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh found what he called the "Lord's Resistance Army objectives," which appear on the site and which he used in a bizarre defense of Kony's group on U.S. television. (His apparently supposed that the LRA is a group of Christians fighting Muslims in Sudan.)
I probably played an indirect role in the "LRA objectives" stuff. A few years back I asked on one of the talkpages if the LRA actually had any political objectives, to which a guy gave the link which was subsequently cited by someone else as the "LRA's objectives" on the main article, and in fact is still cited to this day on that page. I therefore feel that I have, through the power of Wikipedia, affected Rush Limbaugh's life in some way. tongue.gif

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lord%27s...A_on_the_net.3F

This post has been edited by Mister Die: Fri 9th March 2012, 11:33pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 5 13, 5:40am