The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> 

This forum is populated by RSS feeds from various news sources. Members may start topics here and reply to them, but please limit new topics to links to actual news stories. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to the Wikipedia:Glossary.

For accurate information about the "Wikipedia vs. Britannica" study by Nature, please read this.

 
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Purdue students, professors debate Wikipedia credibility - Purdue Exponent
Newsfeed
post Thu 8th March 2012, 3:11pm
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm
Member No.: 2,885

<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />Purdue students, professors debate [b]Wikipedia credibility[/b]
Purdue Exponent
In a January 2011 Time article, reporter Josh Sanburn reported on this study. The prestigious encyclopedia seemed to win the trophy of accuracy just by a margin. “The journal found eight serious errors in the articles,” Sanburn wrote.



View the article
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st 5 13, 8:23pm