The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> A SlimVirgin Close Encounter, ...of the first kind
TabulaRasa
post Tue 26th September 2006, 5:53am
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon 7th Aug 2006, 7:02am
Member No.: 321



QUOTE
If you followed a link on O-Smear to get here, please be sure to read this topic for some more recent commentary on this whole situation. Thanks!

UPDATE: We'd also like to apologize for the fact that the topic referenced earlier was the wrong one, and was, indeed, a dead link until just recently. The topics are referenced by number, and the admin adding this note (who has since been severely punished) originally typed "8623" instead of "8263." (The link was dead until the new number came up and was taken by an RSS-fed media topic.) OOPS! Normally we're more careful than that... sorry! Anyway, the purpose of linking to the other topic was simply to help keep people up-to-date on what we're discussing, and the gist of that was that Wordbomb is not "Joey," at least not according to our IP data, analysis of posting patterns, writing style, attitude, known history on Wikipedia, and just-plain common sense. Sorry about that too, but it's our story and we're sticking to it.

Also, putting notes like this in threads that are linked to by other sites is hardly "unprecedented." Half the time we delete such threads completely, just to piss people off... we're just like that! In this case, we simply want to make it clear that while Wordbomb is generally well-tolerated here, and Gary Weiss is generally disliked, that doesn't mean we have any real desire to get in the middle of their little feud, or whatever it is. Most of us are only concerned with how it plays out on Wikipedia, not elsewhere. That's our "purview," you see. (The site is actually called "Wikipedia Review," not "The Gary and Judd Review"...)

Anyway, thanks! We hope you enjoy the site!

The Management, Apr. 17, 2007


Antisocialmedia.net has found the actual person who might be partly responsible for Linda Mack's slow descent into SlimVirginity. If the story weren't so unbelieveable I'd discount it, but trust me: you can't make this stuff up.

The first half of the post is mostly a rehash of things we've read here, but the second half is where Slim comes in and that's what you really need to read. If it's all true, then SlimVirgin mythology has just taken a huge step forward. It's at http://www.antisocialmedia.net
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Closed TopicStart new topic
Replies
Revision
post Tue 9th October 2007, 1:13pm
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat 6th Oct 2007, 8:11pm
Member No.: 3,414



I don't mean to stir up more controversy with Slimvirgin, but has anyone considered they're chasing the wrong tail?

Those in the Intelligence community are well known to have different names, especially while in operation. The names floating around that are being attributed to Slimvirgin may not be her real name. They're well known to put up front biographies that will pass any scrutiny (especially by even news organizations -- it took CNN's Anderson Cooper to admit he interned for the CIA in college, for example).

No one knows her before her Cambridge days. That the sleuthing stopped there, and SV is operating as usual, is a very good sign whatever her name that was "outted" now, is no concern for her -- it's a dead end.

It's when they become unhinged is when you know you actually got your man/woman (remember the early fallout days of the Cambridge Five? The tipoff was when Phiby and Burgess flew the coop?).

I also wonder why folks claim it's MI5 (FBI), when it sounds more like MI6 (CIA)? It's the MI6 guys that does the foreign intelligence, where the MI5 does the domestic scoops. And the MI6 recruits the weirdos. ph34r.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Herschelkrustofsky
post Tue 9th October 2007, 2:04pm
Post #3


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Revision @ Tue 9th October 2007, 6:13am) *

Those in the Intelligence community are well known to have different names, especially while in operation. The names floating around that are being attributed to Slimvirgin may not be her real name. They're well known to put up front biographies that will pass any scrutiny (especially by even news organizations -- it took CNN's Anderson Cooper to admit he interned for the CIA in college, for example).

...I also wonder why folks claim it's MI5 (FBI), when it sounds more like MI6 (CIA)? It's the MI6 guys that does the foreign intelligence, where the MI5 does the domestic scoops. And the MI6 recruits the weirdos. ph34r.gif


I would assume that Sarah McEwan was the fake name and "front biography" that you refer to, whereas the best evidence we have suggests the Linda Mack was the actual name. As far as the MI5 conclusion, we didn't draw it ourselves -- this comes from her former employer, Pierre Salinger, by way of Mr. Cooley. For a concise summary of all the evidence that has appeared on these pages, I recommend reading Chip Berlet, SlimVirgin, and Wikipedia.


QUOTE(Revision @ Tue 9th October 2007, 6:45am) *

But seriously, what piques my curiosity is how SV can turn on and off her British accent, to even fool natives.


We don't know that she could fool natives. As far as turning on and off a British accent, I've known a number of amateur thespians who did that to make an impression. Apparently Madonna does it. Nowadays, it might help you get a job doing voice-overs on American TV commercials or talent contests. Plus, one of Virginia Slim's parents was evidently British, so it would come naturally and not require a great deal of affectation.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Revision
post Tue 9th October 2007, 3:06pm
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat 6th Oct 2007, 8:11pm
Member No.: 3,414



QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 9th October 2007, 10:04am) *

I would assume that Sarah McEwan was the fake name and "front biography" that you refer to, whereas the best evidence we have suggests the Linda Mack was the actual name. As far as the MI5 conclusion, we didn't draw it ourselves -- this comes from her former employer, Pierre Salinger, by way of Mr. Cooley. For a concise summary of all the evidence that has appeared on these pages, I recommend reading Chip Berlet, SlimVirgin, and Wikipedia.


Yeah, I read the web page, and I still don't think any of the names offered is her real one. Remember the Valerie Plume incident? Now that is how they react when their cover is blown (much like MI6's Philby, and Burgess exiting Britain upon disclosure of their identities).

SV just moves to Canada, not even bothering to cover her tracks very well, even giving folks hints of her interests. She would've known eventually folks will pick up the breadcrumbs, as she left them there for anyone to pick up. Especially going anywhere near the Pan Am 103 topics.

QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 9th October 2007, 10:34am) *

I find it interesting that Linda Mack, the person asserted to be SV, never becomes engaged in this discussion in any of it's various manifestations. If she or a friend just googled "Linda Mack Canada" she would have ample reason to be concerned if she wasn't SV. As far as I know this never happens.

This seems to argue for a correct identification.


Just because someone doesn't attest that XYZ name isn't there's doesn't mean it is there's. Follow some Usenet stalkings, and you'll see very quickly how so many don't say a peep when they were incorrectly "outed".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jorge
post Tue 9th October 2007, 4:09pm
Post #5


Postmaster
*******

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 1,910
Joined: Tue 28th Feb 2006, 11:54am
Member No.: 29



QUOTE(Revision @ Tue 9th October 2007, 4:06pm) *


Yeah, I read the web page, and I still don't think any of the names offered is her real one. Remember the Valerie Plume incident? Now that is how they react when their cover is blown (much like MI6's Philby, and Burgess exiting Britain upon disclosure of their identities).

SV just moves to Canada, not even bothering to cover her tracks very well, even giving folks hints of her interests. She would've known eventually folks will pick up the breadcrumbs, as she left them there for anyone to pick up. Especially going anywhere near the Pan Am 103 topics.

Just because someone doesn't attest that XYZ name isn't there's doesn't mean it is there's. Follow some Usenet stalkings, and you'll see very quickly how so many don't say a peep when they were incorrectly "outed".

You are making assumptions that intelligence operatives are somehow perfect human beings with no weaknesses. There has never really been something like Wikipedia before so people don't (or didn't) really think that anyone could work out who they were just by their topics of interest, especially using a made up name.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Revision
post Tue 9th October 2007, 5:23pm
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat 6th Oct 2007, 8:11pm
Member No.: 3,414



QUOTE(jorge @ Tue 9th October 2007, 12:09pm) *

You are making assumptions that intelligence operatives are somehow perfect human beings with no weaknesses. There has never really been something like Wikipedia before so people don't (or didn't) really think that anyone could work out who they were just by their topics of interest, especially using a made up name.


It takes nothing to truly erase tracks.

It takes something to make more tracks -- heck, even lead the horse to water!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jorge
post Tue 9th October 2007, 6:07pm
Post #7


Postmaster
*******

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 1,910
Joined: Tue 28th Feb 2006, 11:54am
Member No.: 29



QUOTE(Revision @ Tue 9th October 2007, 6:23pm) *

QUOTE(jorge @ Tue 9th October 2007, 12:09pm) *

You are making assumptions that intelligence operatives are somehow perfect human beings with no weaknesses. There has never really been something like Wikipedia before so people don't (or didn't) really think that anyone could work out who they were just by their topics of interest, especially using a made up name.


It takes nothing to truly erase tracks.

It takes something to make more tracks -- heck, even lead the horse to water!

The thing is it's possible she didn't even give her email to Cambridge University, it could have been a friend of hers and she had no idea it was on there. Without the email on the Cambridge Alumni website noone would have ever worked out that SlimVirgin was Linda Mack.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Revision
post Tue 9th October 2007, 6:29pm
Post #8


Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat 6th Oct 2007, 8:11pm
Member No.: 3,414



QUOTE(jorge @ Tue 9th October 2007, 2:07pm) *

The thing is it's possible she didn't even give her email to Cambridge University, it could have been a friend of hers and she had no idea it was on there. Without the email on the Cambridge Alumni website noone would have ever worked out that SlimVirgin was Linda Mack.


The question still remains is she Linda Mack? What evidence than an email addy and a web search says it is her?

That SV will be the first to volunteer for difficult blocks at Wikipedia, despite this "outing", I doubt just over confidence of being some agent (real or imagined) is enough to make such a "fragile" person so confident.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kato
post Tue 9th October 2007, 6:34pm
Post #9


dhd
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767



QUOTE(Revision @ Tue 9th October 2007, 7:29pm) *

QUOTE(jorge @ Tue 9th October 2007, 2:07pm) *

The thing is it's possible she didn't even give her email to Cambridge University, it could have been a friend of hers and she had no idea it was on there. Without the email on the Cambridge Alumni website noone would have ever worked out that SlimVirgin was Linda Mack.


The question still remains is she Linda Mack? What evidence than an email addy and a web search says it is her?

That SV will be the first to volunteer for difficult blocks at Wikipedia, despite this "outing", I doubt just over confidence of being some agent (real or imagined) is enough to make such a "fragile" person so confident.

You're not following the timeline of this. Since the Linda Mack revelation, SV has been in a consistent state of fragility. Off wiki and on. Including protracted negotiations with the staff of the Review regarding the mentioning of her real name. She now barely contributes to wikipedia. Much of it is already detailed on these pages for right or for wrong.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
TabulaRasa   A SlimVirgin Close Encounter   Tue 26th September 2006, 5:53am
Herschelkrustofsky   I'd like to get Daniel's opinion on whethe...   Tue 26th September 2006, 12:46pm
EuroSceptic   If true, very interesting.....   Tue 26th September 2006, 1:41pm
LamontStormstar   Whoever runs that site is another bastard hiding b...   Tue 26th September 2006, 2:39pm
IronDuke   Insofar as Slim's psycho-social background is ...   Tue 26th September 2006, 6:20pm
Somey   Just so we're all clear, knda-sorta, WordBomb ...   Wed 27th September 2006, 4:34am
Daniel Brandt   From larouchepub.com: You bet he left it off his ...   Wed 27th September 2006, 11:05pm
Herschelkrustofsky   From [url=http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2001/2...   Thu 28th September 2006, 7:09am
TabulaRasa   THIS JUST IN! Hot off the RSS reader, it...   Thu 28th September 2006, 1:51am
Somey   Fascinating! Assuming this is all true (and B...   Thu 28th September 2006, 2:48am
Daniel Brandt   This is amazing. I have to assume that it is legit...   Thu 28th September 2006, 3:07am
EuroSceptic   Ask Patrick Byrne to send this directly to Jimmy W...   Thu 28th September 2006, 3:36am
IronDuke   I don't know what to say other than un-fucking...   Thu 28th September 2006, 6:15am
Daniel Brandt   About Jimbo: "He worked as Research Director ...   Thu 28th September 2006, 7:05am
Joey   /   Thu 28th September 2006, 1:45pm
Herschelkrustofsky   I'd like to offer some observations concerning...   Fri 29th September 2006, 9:29pm
Somey   In the context presented, I am assuming that she u...   Fri 29th September 2006, 10:04pm
Herschelkrustofsky   That still sounds (to me) much less realistic tha...   Sat 30th September 2006, 12:29am
EuroSceptic   You may be right, of course, but could you elabor...   Sat 30th September 2006, 4:17am
Somey   ...Or are you arguing that the whole affair simpl...   Sat 30th September 2006, 5:37am
Herschelkrustofsky   Ultimately, the people who took that idealized gu...   Sat 30th September 2006, 6:39am
Somey   I'm trying to see how this fits the vendetta a...   Sat 30th September 2006, 7:15am
Joey   /   Sat 30th September 2006, 8:13am
Herschelkrustofsky   You're Australian, so in spite of your being ...   Sat 30th September 2006, 2:50pm
Herschelkrustofsky   I'd suggest that she simply saw the anti-LaRo...   Wed 4th October 2006, 10:09pm
Herschelkrustofsky   Ultimately, the people who took that idealized gu...   Thu 5th October 2006, 6:41am
Daniel Brandt   I agree with Somey. Do a Google for "families...   Fri 29th September 2006, 10:57pm
Herschelkrustofsky   Does anyone live close to a local library that ha...   Mon 2nd October 2006, 9:54pm
Daniel Brandt   Michael S. Morris, born Jan.1940, is a former BOSS...   Sat 30th September 2006, 4:52am
Daniel Brandt   A minor correction. As far as I know, her work fo...   Sat 30th September 2006, 6:34pm
Patrick Byrne   Hello Wikipedia Review. Respect to all. I am hono...   Sat 30th September 2006, 9:05pm
guy   A very warm welcome to Patrick Byrne.   Sat 30th September 2006, 9:48pm
Patrick Byrne   A very warm welcome to Patrick Byrne. Very warm...   Sat 30th September 2006, 10:57pm
EuroSceptic   Dropping jaw. This gets more interesting every min...   Sat 30th September 2006, 9:59pm
Joey   This points us toward a theory of personality that...   Sat 30th September 2006, 10:22pm
Daniel Brandt   Excellent post, Joey, and thanks again, Patrick. ...   Sat 30th September 2006, 11:16pm
Patrick Byrne   Joey, I commend you on the intelligence of your ...   Sun 1st October 2006, 12:26am
Herschelkrustofsky   My view is that we are on the edge of exposing th...   Sun 1st October 2006, 12:39am
Somey   And on top of all that, now I learn that Sid Vicio...   Sun 1st October 2006, 12:30am
Surfer   Just a quick note to wish Patrick Byrne: welcome, ...   Sun 1st October 2006, 2:01am
Jonny Cache   Well, this is all very fascinating stuff, and of c...   Sun 1st October 2006, 2:19am
TabulaRasa   I wouldn't want Wikipedia Review to slide dow...   Sun 1st October 2006, 2:38am
Somey   I wouldn't want Wikipedia Review to slide down...   Sun 1st October 2006, 3:22am
Jonny Cache   Myself, I swear by Maxwell's Razor: [font=Gar...   Sun 1st October 2006, 3:35am
Somey   Myself, I swear by Maxwell's Razor: [font=Gara...   Sun 1st October 2006, 4:15am
guy   Myself, I swear by Maxwell's Razor: [font=Gar...   Sun 1st October 2006, 1:13pm
Daniel Brandt   SlimVirgin started a stub on John K. Cooley in Dec...   Sun 1st October 2006, 11:15pm
Daniel Brandt   Thanks, HK. That's one more thing that doesn...   Mon 2nd October 2006, 11:23pm
Somey   Sorry, I just had to take note of this: Tony, you...   Tue 3rd October 2006, 5:35am
EuroSceptic   Indeed. Anyone noticed the relative low contributi...   Tue 3rd October 2006, 1:34pm
Somey   Indeed. Anyone noticed the relative low contributi...   Tue 3rd October 2006, 2:10pm
IronDuke   Indeed. Anyone noticed the relative low contribut...   Tue 3rd October 2006, 7:04pm
TabulaRasa   Indeed. Anyone noticed the relative low contribu...   Tue 3rd October 2006, 7:17pm
guy   Indeed. Anyone noticed the relative low contribu...   Tue 3rd October 2006, 9:40pm
Daniel Brandt   Bad news: I heard from Syracuse University, and th...   Tue 3rd October 2006, 5:08pm
Daniel Brandt   The Kings College email discovery was the tipping ...   Tue 3rd October 2006, 8:01pm
IronDuke   Finally, her poodle looks very sad to have ended ...   Wed 4th October 2006, 6:04am
Somey   Nah, that's because she won't feed it meat...   Wed 4th October 2006, 6:24am
EuroSceptic   She's back   Tue 3rd October 2006, 9:52pm
Somey   Apparently Bhouston is still at it, too! Here,...   Tue 3rd October 2006, 11:06pm
Surfer   I think you are a bit mistaken here? It was Bhous...   Wed 4th October 2006, 2:03am
Somey   I think you are a bit mistaken here? It was Bhous...   Wed 4th October 2006, 3:12am
EuroSceptic   SlimVirgin is now dismantling it as planned.   Wed 4th October 2006, 2:13am
Selina   lolol vegetarian dog... how sad.   Wed 4th October 2006, 10:32am
TabulaRasa   Everybody see the changes she's making to the ...   Wed 4th October 2006, 4:11pm
Somey   Pardon me for suggesting this, but why are they ev...   Wed 4th October 2006, 5:14pm
Daniel Brandt   My domains came off the Wikipedia spam blacklist y...   Wed 4th October 2006, 5:36pm
Selina   My domains came off the Wikipedia spam blacklist ...   Tue 10th October 2006, 12:53am
TabulaRasa   I'm completely captivated by the discussion ar...   Wed 4th October 2006, 11:39pm
AV Roe   It looks like another RFArbcomm complaint against ...   Tue 10th October 2006, 3:48pm
EuroSceptic   Of course, she gets full protection as the uncrown...   Tue 10th October 2006, 5:21pm
Jonny Cache   And the MI6 recruits the weirdos. :ph34r: Darn...   Tue 9th October 2007, 1:22pm
Revision   Darn you !!! Now they'll just go...   Tue 9th October 2007, 1:45pm
Eva Destruction   But seriously, what piques my curiosity is how SV ...   Tue 9th October 2007, 3:40pm
Revision   But seriously, what piques my curiosity is how SV...   Tue 9th October 2007, 3:52pm
Kato   and SV is operating as usual, is a very good sign...   Tue 9th October 2007, 1:30pm
GlassBeadGame   I find it interesting that Linda Mack, the person ...   Tue 9th October 2007, 2:34pm
jorge   Yeah, I read the web page, and I still don't...   Tue 9th October 2007, 4:09pm
Revision   The thing is it's possible she didn't eve...   Tue 9th October 2007, 6:29pm
Revision   You're not following the timeline of this. Si...   Tue 9th October 2007, 7:02pm
Kato   But the thing that I'm trying to state is -- ...   Tue 9th October 2007, 7:11pm
GlassBeadGame   You're not following the timeline of this. S...   Tue 9th October 2007, 7:22pm
jorge   The thing is it's possible she didn't ev...   Tue 9th October 2007, 6:48pm
Daniel Brandt   How many times do we have to go through this for r...   Tue 9th October 2007, 7:09pm
Kato   I believe that Linda Mack may be an agent of infl...   Tue 9th October 2007, 7:31pm
Herschelkrustofsky   I believe that Linda Mack may be an agent of inf...   Tue 9th October 2007, 9:24pm


Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 6 13, 3:55pm