| |
A SlimVirgin Close Encounter, ...of the first kind |
|
|
| TabulaRasa |
Tue 26th September 2006, 5:53am
|
Junior Member
 
Group: Contributors
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon 7th Aug 2006, 7:02am
Member No.: 321

|
QUOTE If you followed a link on O-Smear to get here, please be sure to read this topic for some more recent commentary on this whole situation. Thanks! UPDATE: We'd also like to apologize for the fact that the topic referenced earlier was the wrong one, and was, indeed, a dead link until just recently. The topics are referenced by number, and the admin adding this note (who has since been severely punished) originally typed "8623" instead of "8263." (The link was dead until the new number came up and was taken by an RSS-fed media topic.) OOPS! Normally we're more careful than that... sorry! Anyway, the purpose of linking to the other topic was simply to help keep people up-to-date on what we're discussing, and the gist of that was that Wordbomb is not "Joey," at least not according to our IP data, analysis of posting patterns, writing style, attitude, known history on Wikipedia, and just-plain common sense. Sorry about that too, but it's our story and we're sticking to it. Also, putting notes like this in threads that are linked to by other sites is hardly "unprecedented." Half the time we delete such threads completely, just to piss people off... we're just like that! In this case, we simply want to make it clear that while Wordbomb is generally well-tolerated here, and Gary Weiss is generally disliked, that doesn't mean we have any real desire to get in the middle of their little feud, or whatever it is. Most of us are only concerned with how it plays out on Wikipedia, not elsewhere. That's our "purview," you see. (The site is actually called "Wikipedia Review," not "The Gary and Judd Review"...) Anyway, thanks! We hope you enjoy the site! The Management, Apr. 17, 2007 Antisocialmedia.net has found the actual person who might be partly responsible for Linda Mack's slow descent into SlimVirginity. If the story weren't so unbelieveable I'd discount it, but trust me: you can't make this stuff up. The first half of the post is mostly a rehash of things we've read here, but the second half is where Slim comes in and that's what you really need to read. If it's all true, then SlimVirgin mythology has just taken a huge step forward. It's at http://www.antisocialmedia.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
Replies
| Revision |
Tue 9th October 2007, 1:13pm
|
Member
 
Group: Contributors
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat 6th Oct 2007, 8:11pm
Member No.: 3,414

|
I don't mean to stir up more controversy with Slimvirgin, but has anyone considered they're chasing the wrong tail? Those in the Intelligence community are well known to have different names, especially while in operation. The names floating around that are being attributed to Slimvirgin may not be her real name. They're well known to put up front biographies that will pass any scrutiny (especially by even news organizations -- it took CNN's Anderson Cooper to admit he interned for the CIA in college, for example). No one knows her before her Cambridge days. That the sleuthing stopped there, and SV is operating as usual, is a very good sign whatever her name that was "outted" now, is no concern for her -- it's a dead end. It's when they become unhinged is when you know you actually got your man/woman (remember the early fallout days of the Cambridge Five? The tipoff was when Phiby and Burgess flew the coop?). I also wonder why folks claim it's MI5 (FBI), when it sounds more like MI6 (CIA)? It's the MI6 guys that does the foreign intelligence, where the MI5 does the domestic scoops. And the MI6 recruits the weirdos. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Herschelkrustofsky |
Tue 9th October 2007, 2:04pm
|
Member
        
Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Revision @ Tue 9th October 2007, 6:13am)  Those in the Intelligence community are well known to have different names, especially while in operation. The names floating around that are being attributed to Slimvirgin may not be her real name. They're well known to put up front biographies that will pass any scrutiny (especially by even news organizations -- it took CNN's Anderson Cooper to admit he interned for the CIA in college, for example). ...I also wonder why folks claim it's MI5 (FBI), when it sounds more like MI6 (CIA)? It's the MI6 guys that does the foreign intelligence, where the MI5 does the domestic scoops. And the MI6 recruits the weirdos.  I would assume that Sarah McEwan was the fake name and "front biography" that you refer to, whereas the best evidence we have suggests the Linda Mack was the actual name. As far as the MI5 conclusion, we didn't draw it ourselves -- this comes from her former employer, Pierre Salinger, by way of Mr. Cooley. For a concise summary of all the evidence that has appeared on these pages, I recommend reading Chip Berlet, SlimVirgin, and Wikipedia.QUOTE(Revision @ Tue 9th October 2007, 6:45am)  But seriously, what piques my curiosity is how SV can turn on and off her British accent, to even fool natives.
We don't know that she could fool natives. As far as turning on and off a British accent, I've known a number of amateur thespians who did that to make an impression. Apparently Madonna does it. Nowadays, it might help you get a job doing voice-overs on American TV commercials or talent contests. Plus, one of Virginia Slim's parents was evidently British, so it would come naturally and not require a great deal of affectation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Revision |
Tue 9th October 2007, 3:06pm
|
Member
 
Group: Contributors
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat 6th Oct 2007, 8:11pm
Member No.: 3,414

|
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 9th October 2007, 10:04am)  I would assume that Sarah McEwan was the fake name and "front biography" that you refer to, whereas the best evidence we have suggests the Linda Mack was the actual name. As far as the MI5 conclusion, we didn't draw it ourselves -- this comes from her former employer, Pierre Salinger, by way of Mr. Cooley. For a concise summary of all the evidence that has appeared on these pages, I recommend reading Chip Berlet, SlimVirgin, and Wikipedia.Yeah, I read the web page, and I still don't think any of the names offered is her real one. Remember the Valerie Plume incident? Now that is how they react when their cover is blown (much like MI6's Philby, and Burgess exiting Britain upon disclosure of their identities). SV just moves to Canada, not even bothering to cover her tracks very well, even giving folks hints of her interests. She would've known eventually folks will pick up the breadcrumbs, as she left them there for anyone to pick up. Especially going anywhere near the Pan Am 103 topics. QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 9th October 2007, 10:34am)  I find it interesting that Linda Mack, the person asserted to be SV, never becomes engaged in this discussion in any of it's various manifestations. If she or a friend just googled "Linda Mack Canada" she would have ample reason to be concerned if she wasn't SV. As far as I know this never happens. This seems to argue for a correct identification. Just because someone doesn't attest that XYZ name isn't there's doesn't mean it is there's. Follow some Usenet stalkings, and you'll see very quickly how so many don't say a peep when they were incorrectly "outed".
|
|
|
|
|
|
| jorge |
Tue 9th October 2007, 4:09pm
|
Postmaster
      
Group: On Vacation
Posts: 1,910
Joined: Tue 28th Feb 2006, 11:54am
Member No.: 29

|
QUOTE(Revision @ Tue 9th October 2007, 4:06pm) 
Yeah, I read the web page, and I still don't think any of the names offered is her real one. Remember the Valerie Plume incident? Now that is how they react when their cover is blown (much like MI6's Philby, and Burgess exiting Britain upon disclosure of their identities).
SV just moves to Canada, not even bothering to cover her tracks very well, even giving folks hints of her interests. She would've known eventually folks will pick up the breadcrumbs, as she left them there for anyone to pick up. Especially going anywhere near the Pan Am 103 topics.
Just because someone doesn't attest that XYZ name isn't there's doesn't mean it is there's. Follow some Usenet stalkings, and you'll see very quickly how so many don't say a peep when they were incorrectly "outed".
You are making assumptions that intelligence operatives are somehow perfect human beings with no weaknesses. There has never really been something like Wikipedia before so people don't (or didn't) really think that anyone could work out who they were just by their topics of interest, especially using a made up name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Revision |
Tue 9th October 2007, 5:23pm
|
Member
 
Group: Contributors
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat 6th Oct 2007, 8:11pm
Member No.: 3,414

|
QUOTE(jorge @ Tue 9th October 2007, 12:09pm)  You are making assumptions that intelligence operatives are somehow perfect human beings with no weaknesses. There has never really been something like Wikipedia before so people don't (or didn't) really think that anyone could work out who they were just by their topics of interest, especially using a made up name.
It takes nothing to truly erase tracks. It takes something to make more tracks -- heck, even lead the horse to water!
|
|
|
|
|
|
| jorge |
Tue 9th October 2007, 6:07pm
|
Postmaster
      
Group: On Vacation
Posts: 1,910
Joined: Tue 28th Feb 2006, 11:54am
Member No.: 29

|
QUOTE(Revision @ Tue 9th October 2007, 6:23pm)  QUOTE(jorge @ Tue 9th October 2007, 12:09pm)  You are making assumptions that intelligence operatives are somehow perfect human beings with no weaknesses. There has never really been something like Wikipedia before so people don't (or didn't) really think that anyone could work out who they were just by their topics of interest, especially using a made up name.
It takes nothing to truly erase tracks. It takes something to make more tracks -- heck, even lead the horse to water! The thing is it's possible she didn't even give her email to Cambridge University, it could have been a friend of hers and she had no idea it was on there. Without the email on the Cambridge Alumni website noone would have ever worked out that SlimVirgin was Linda Mack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Revision |
Tue 9th October 2007, 6:29pm
|
Member
 
Group: Contributors
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat 6th Oct 2007, 8:11pm
Member No.: 3,414

|
QUOTE(jorge @ Tue 9th October 2007, 2:07pm)  The thing is it's possible she didn't even give her email to Cambridge University, it could have been a friend of hers and she had no idea it was on there. Without the email on the Cambridge Alumni website noone would have ever worked out that SlimVirgin was Linda Mack.
The question still remains is she Linda Mack? What evidence than an email addy and a web search says it is her? That SV will be the first to volunteer for difficult blocks at Wikipedia, despite this "outing", I doubt just over confidence of being some agent (real or imagined) is enough to make such a "fragile" person so confident.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Revision |
Tue 9th October 2007, 7:02pm
|
Member
 
Group: Contributors
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat 6th Oct 2007, 8:11pm
Member No.: 3,414

|
QUOTE(Kato @ Tue 9th October 2007, 2:34pm)  You're not following the timeline of this. Since the Linda Mack revelation, SV has been in a consistent state of fragility. Off wiki and on. Including protracted negotiations with the staff of the Review regarding the mentioning of her real name. She now barely contributes to wikipedia. Much of it is already detailed on these pages for right or for wrong.
Not fragile enough to quit her job, despite folks "knowing" her identity. Staying at Wikipedia is more important than having a kook over for dinner? Not like were she's reportingly lives has that many residents. If what that CEO stated was true, she couldn't handle an email from a kook -- one on her doorstep is enough to make her change her residence and name again. That didn't happen. She may have been more scared that the snooping would've continued, though. But the thing that I'm trying to state is -- if you guys are about facts and evidence, what's presented has more holes than Swiss cheese in it. There's nothing here as real evidence, other than some pieced together ideas. Wouldn't want a court to begin even a traffic case with this much "evidence". QUOTE(jorge @ Tue 9th October 2007, 2:48pm)  No, there is no doubt whatsoever that the editor SlimVirgin on Wikipedia is Linda Mack who studied philosophy at King's College, Cambridge in the late 1980s under Bernard Williams and who worked for Pierre Salinger and was subsequently fired by him. Her first ever edit to Wikipedia was to make derogatory edits to Pierre Salinger's biography just after he had died.
You're not getting it: "Linda Mack" may not be her real name. Someone suspected of working for MI5 isn't going to be an agent overnight. There's at least orientation and some other training to be done (look what was said about Anderson Cooper's stint in the CIA in college). That she got involved into the Pan Am 103 families as she did, despite not having a family member perish, says if she was a MI5 (or MI6) agent, she was one before it happened to be crafty enough to weasle in. It's the before part that can mean "Linda Mack" isn't her real name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GlassBeadGame |
Tue 9th October 2007, 7:22pm
|

Dharma Bum
        
Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981

|
QUOTE(Revision @ Tue 9th October 2007, 1:02pm)  QUOTE(Kato @ Tue 9th October 2007, 2:34pm)  You're not following the timeline of this. Since the Linda Mack revelation, SV has been in a consistent state of fragility. Off wiki and on. Including protracted negotiations with the staff of the Review regarding the mentioning of her real name. She now barely contributes to wikipedia. Much of it is already detailed on these pages for right or for wrong.
Not fragile enough to quit her job, despite folks "knowing" her identity. Staying at Wikipedia is more important than having a kook over for dinner? Not like were she's reportingly lives has that many residents. If what that CEO stated was true, she couldn't handle an email from a kook -- one on her doorstep is enough to make her change her residence and name again. That didn't happen. She may have been more scared that the snooping would've continued, though. But the thing that I'm trying to state is -- if you guys are about facts and evidence, what's presented has more holes than Swiss cheese in it. There's nothing here as real evidence, other than some pieced together ideas. Wouldn't want a court to begin even a traffic case with this much "evidence". QUOTE(jorge @ Tue 9th October 2007, 2:48pm)  No, there is no doubt whatsoever that the editor SlimVirgin on Wikipedia is Linda Mack who studied philosophy at King's College, Cambridge in the late 1980s under Bernard Williams and who worked for Pierre Salinger and was subsequently fired by him. Her first ever edit to Wikipedia was to make derogatory edits to Pierre Salinger's biography just after he had died.
You're not getting it: "Linda Mack" may not be her real name. Someone suspected of working for MI5 isn't going to be an agent overnight. There's at least orientation and some other training to be done (look what was said about Anderson Cooper's stint in the CIA in college). That she got involved into the Pan Am 103 families as she did, despite not having a family member perish, says if she was a MI5 (or MI6) agent, she was one before it happened to be crafty enough to weasle in. It's the before part that can mean "Linda Mack" isn't her real name. We have discussed this at length previously. The best view is that Linda Mack/Sarah/SV is not an actual career agent with the attendant professionalism. She is more likely a low level operative who is on occasion utilized by agents. She has a history that involves a presumably accidental connection to 103 which motivated some journalistic activities in the middle east. She also possess a set of social skill that permits her to gain influence in the survivor's group as well as WP social networking environment. According to P.S. she was engaged in at least one intelligence operation in the capacity of a journalist who snitched on her principals. Her WP activities might have been as an low level operative in a failed experiment by an intelligence agency or it might just be the sad obsession of a person living in the past. Don't make her out to be a more attractive character than what she is, or to rule her out because she lack super-spy skills.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
TabulaRasa A SlimVirgin Close Encounter Tue 26th September 2006, 5:53am Herschelkrustofsky I'd like to get Daniel's opinion on whethe... Tue 26th September 2006, 12:46pm EuroSceptic If true, very interesting..... Tue 26th September 2006, 1:41pm LamontStormstar Whoever runs that site is another bastard hiding b... Tue 26th September 2006, 2:39pm IronDuke Insofar as Slim's psycho-social background is ... Tue 26th September 2006, 6:20pm Somey Just so we're all clear, knda-sorta, WordBomb ... Wed 27th September 2006, 4:34am Daniel Brandt From larouchepub.com:
You bet he left it off his ... Wed 27th September 2006, 11:05pm Herschelkrustofsky
From [url=http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2001/2... Thu 28th September 2006, 7:09am TabulaRasa THIS JUST IN!
Hot off the RSS reader, it... Thu 28th September 2006, 1:51am Somey Fascinating!
Assuming this is all true (and B... Thu 28th September 2006, 2:48am Daniel Brandt This is amazing. I have to assume that it is legit... Thu 28th September 2006, 3:07am EuroSceptic Ask Patrick Byrne to send this directly to Jimmy W... Thu 28th September 2006, 3:36am IronDuke I don't know what to say other than un-fucking... Thu 28th September 2006, 6:15am Daniel Brandt About Jimbo: "He worked as Research Director ... Thu 28th September 2006, 7:05am Joey / Thu 28th September 2006, 1:45pm Herschelkrustofsky I'd like to offer some observations concerning... Fri 29th September 2006, 9:29pm Somey In the context presented, I am assuming that she u... Fri 29th September 2006, 10:04pm  Herschelkrustofsky
That still sounds (to me) much less realistic tha... Sat 30th September 2006, 12:29am   EuroSceptic
You may be right, of course, but could you elabor... Sat 30th September 2006, 4:17am   Somey ...Or are you arguing that the whole affair simpl... Sat 30th September 2006, 5:37am    Herschelkrustofsky
Ultimately, the people who took that idealized gu... Sat 30th September 2006, 6:39am     Somey I'm trying to see how this fits the vendetta a... Sat 30th September 2006, 7:15am      Joey / Sat 30th September 2006, 8:13am      Herschelkrustofsky
You're Australian, so in spite of your being ... Sat 30th September 2006, 2:50pm      Herschelkrustofsky
I'd suggest that she simply saw the anti-LaRo... Wed 4th October 2006, 10:09pm    Herschelkrustofsky
Ultimately, the people who took that idealized gu... Thu 5th October 2006, 6:41am Daniel Brandt I agree with Somey. Do a Google for "families... Fri 29th September 2006, 10:57pm Herschelkrustofsky
Does anyone live close to a local library that ha... Mon 2nd October 2006, 9:54pm Daniel Brandt Michael S. Morris, born Jan.1940, is a former BOSS... Sat 30th September 2006, 4:52am Daniel Brandt
A minor correction. As far as I know, her work fo... Sat 30th September 2006, 6:34pm Patrick Byrne Hello Wikipedia Review.
Respect to all. I am hono... Sat 30th September 2006, 9:05pm guy A very warm welcome to Patrick Byrne. Sat 30th September 2006, 9:48pm Patrick Byrne
A very warm welcome to Patrick Byrne.
Very warm... Sat 30th September 2006, 10:57pm EuroSceptic Dropping jaw. This gets more interesting every min... Sat 30th September 2006, 9:59pm Joey This points us toward a theory of personality that... Sat 30th September 2006, 10:22pm Daniel Brandt
Excellent post, Joey, and thanks again, Patrick. ... Sat 30th September 2006, 11:16pm Patrick Byrne Joey,
I commend you on the intelligence of your ... Sun 1st October 2006, 12:26am Herschelkrustofsky
My view is that we are on the edge of exposing th... Sun 1st October 2006, 12:39am Somey And on top of all that, now I learn that Sid Vicio... Sun 1st October 2006, 12:30am Surfer Just a quick note to wish Patrick Byrne: welcome, ... Sun 1st October 2006, 2:01am Jonny Cache Well, this is all very fascinating stuff, and of c... Sun 1st October 2006, 2:19am TabulaRasa
I wouldn't want Wikipedia Review to slide dow... Sun 1st October 2006, 2:38am  Somey I wouldn't want Wikipedia Review to slide down... Sun 1st October 2006, 3:22am Jonny Cache Myself, I swear by Maxwell's Razor:
[font=Gar... Sun 1st October 2006, 3:35am Somey Myself, I swear by Maxwell's Razor: [font=Gara... Sun 1st October 2006, 4:15am  guy
Myself, I swear by Maxwell's Razor: [font=Gar... Sun 1st October 2006, 1:13pm Daniel Brandt SlimVirgin started a stub on John K. Cooley in Dec... Sun 1st October 2006, 11:15pm Daniel Brandt Thanks, HK. That's one more thing that doesn... Mon 2nd October 2006, 11:23pm Somey Sorry, I just had to take note of this:
Tony, you... Tue 3rd October 2006, 5:35am EuroSceptic Indeed. Anyone noticed the relative low contributi... Tue 3rd October 2006, 1:34pm Somey Indeed. Anyone noticed the relative low contributi... Tue 3rd October 2006, 2:10pm IronDuke
Indeed. Anyone noticed the relative low contribut... Tue 3rd October 2006, 7:04pm  TabulaRasa
Indeed. Anyone noticed the relative low contribu... Tue 3rd October 2006, 7:17pm  guy
Indeed. Anyone noticed the relative low contribu... Tue 3rd October 2006, 9:40pm Daniel Brandt Bad news: I heard from Syracuse University, and th... Tue 3rd October 2006, 5:08pm Daniel Brandt The Kings College email discovery was the tipping ... Tue 3rd October 2006, 8:01pm IronDuke
Finally, her poodle looks very sad to have ended ... Wed 4th October 2006, 6:04am  Somey Nah, that's because she won't feed it meat... Wed 4th October 2006, 6:24am EuroSceptic She's back Tue 3rd October 2006, 9:52pm Somey Apparently Bhouston is still at it, too! Here,... Tue 3rd October 2006, 11:06pm Surfer I think you are a bit mistaken here? It was Bhous... Wed 4th October 2006, 2:03am Somey I think you are a bit mistaken here? It was Bhous... Wed 4th October 2006, 3:12am EuroSceptic SlimVirgin is now dismantling it as planned. Wed 4th October 2006, 2:13am Selina lolol vegetarian dog... how sad. Wed 4th October 2006, 10:32am TabulaRasa Everybody see the changes she's making to the ... Wed 4th October 2006, 4:11pm Somey Pardon me for suggesting this, but why are they ev... Wed 4th October 2006, 5:14pm Daniel Brandt My domains came off the Wikipedia spam blacklist y... Wed 4th October 2006, 5:36pm Selina
My domains came off the Wikipedia spam blacklist ... Tue 10th October 2006, 12:53am TabulaRasa I'm completely captivated by the discussion ar... Wed 4th October 2006, 11:39pm AV Roe It looks like another RFArbcomm complaint against ... Tue 10th October 2006, 3:48pm EuroSceptic Of course, she gets full protection as the uncrown... Tue 10th October 2006, 5:21pm Jonny Cache
And the MI6 recruits the weirdos. :ph34r:
Darn... Tue 9th October 2007, 1:22pm  Revision
Darn you !!! Now they'll just go... Tue 9th October 2007, 1:45pm   Eva Destruction But seriously, what piques my curiosity is how SV ... Tue 9th October 2007, 3:40pm    Revision
But seriously, what piques my curiosity is how SV... Tue 9th October 2007, 3:52pm Kato
and SV is operating as usual, is a very good sign... Tue 9th October 2007, 1:30pm  GlassBeadGame I find it interesting that Linda Mack, the person ... Tue 9th October 2007, 2:34pm         Kato
But the thing that I'm trying to state is -- ... Tue 9th October 2007, 7:11pm       jorge
The thing is it's possible she didn't ev... Tue 9th October 2007, 6:48pm Daniel Brandt How many times do we have to go through this for r... Tue 9th October 2007, 7:09pm Kato
I believe that Linda Mack may be an agent of infl... Tue 9th October 2007, 7:31pm Herschelkrustofsky
I believe that Linda Mack may be an agent of inf... Tue 9th October 2007, 9:24pm
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |