The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> 

This forum is populated by RSS feeds from various news sources. Members may start topics here and reply to them, but please limit new topics to links to actual news stories. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to the Wikipedia:Glossary.

For accurate information about the "Wikipedia vs. Britannica" study by Nature, please read this.

 
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
> The Supreme Court Spurns Wikipedia, But Federal Appeals Courts Cited It Nearly ... - ABA Journal
Newsfeed
post Tue 24th April 2012, 1:37pm
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm
Member No.: 2,885

<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />The Supreme Court Spurns [b]Wikipedia, But Federal Appeals Courts Cited It Nearly ...[/b]
ABA Journal
By Debra Cassens Weiss Federal appeals courts are increasingly citing the reader-edited encyclopedia Wikipedia, though the trend has not spread to the US Supreme Court. Federal appeals courts have cited Wikipedia about 95 times in the last five years, ...

and more »

View the article
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 5 13, 7:21am