The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Merridew
Ottava
post Wed 16th May 2012, 1:17am
Post #1


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,915
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



What does Merridew have on so many Arbs? We know that John Vandenberg and Risker bent over backwards to not only protect Jack but encourage his absolutely disruptive behavior. But looking over this is revolting. The user disrupts thousands of articles, has dozens of socks that harass people, and breaks every policy that would get anyone else banned. Jack has not only destroyed articles but chased off legitimate content editors or used his socks to help cheer on bans.

AGK, Floquenbean, etc., all say things that are worthy of banning there. They are justifying the worst behavior, and that is like saying we should let a pyromaniac have as much access to gasoline and matches as possible. It is really, really irresponsible.

AGK, what the fuck is wrong with you? You are here. You aren't able to defend yourself, so I don't expect a response. But don't you feel any shame? You have kept many good people banned, but you are absolutely defending some of the most disgusting, worst people there.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 5 13, 9:18pm