FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2943 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Conservapedia -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

 
Closed TopicStart new topic
> Conservapedia
The Joy
post
Post #21


I am a millipede! I am amazing!
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,839
Joined:
From: The Moon
Member No.: 982



Has anyone seen this Conservapedia?

http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page

I'm no fan of Wikipedia's NPOV (my academic experience finds that such a concept cannot exist), but the bias on this new online "encyclopedia" is just terrible!

As someone with a degree in History, this is just sickening.

I think we all knew one day the Religious Right would one day make their own Wikipedia, but, oh boy, this one's a whopper (with cheese)!

(Note: I am not anti-religious or anti-Christian. I consider myself a Christian, before anyone starts ranting about me being an atheist or anything like that).

I wonder if anyone out there has started a Conservapedia Review yet (I know they will)?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Nathan
post
Post #22


Retired
******

Group: Inactive
Posts: 1,609
Joined:
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 17



I'd love to see one.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Joy
post
Post #23


I am a millipede! I am amazing!
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,839
Joined:
From: The Moon
Member No.: 982



JoshuaZ is there!

http://www.conservapedia.com/User:JoshuaZ

He was nearly blocked for 3 months for POV Pushing, though.

http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?tit...ge=User:JoshuaZ

This post has been edited by The Joy:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ashibaka
post
Post #24


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 118
Joined:
Member No.: 45



I guess all Conservapedia proves is that Republicans really do live in their own, separate reality-- one that requires its own Wikipedia, even. Stephen Colbert isn't funny anymore, he's just a sad reminder of how American politics works.

This post has been edited by Ashibaka:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alkivar
post
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 121
Joined:
Member No.: 211



Ashibaka as a Republican i take exception to that statement. Not all Republicans are loony right-wing christians, some of us are moderates who just want a smaller government. I find the democratic choices unacceptable, and the libertarian candidates a wasted vote.

The closest i've seen to someone with similar leanings would be Ron Paul... a Republican.

Even I see Conservapedia as a waste of time and space.

This post has been edited by Alkivar:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ashibaka
post
Post #26


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 118
Joined:
Member No.: 45



My apologies, by "Republican" I meant "Bush Republican" and not honest, intelligent politicians like Ron Paul.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post
Post #27


Can't actually moderate (or even post)
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,816
Joined:
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



It's typical of the neo-conservatives to assume they represent all conservatives and/or Republicans. (I'm neither, personally, but it's still typical...)

What gets me is that they started hyping the site to the media before they even came up with a logo for the top left corner. Neo-cons are supposed to be better at marketing than that, aren't they? Back in the Reagan days they would never have let themselves look as half-assed as that! (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JohnA
post
Post #28


Looking over Winston Smith's shoulder
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,171
Joined:
Member No.: 313



I already covered this on my blog. I do know one or two Republicans but they're just as far away from this Religious Right POS as I am.

It's quite easy to produce something a lot worse than Wikipedia but to produce something better than Wikipedia you have to stop imitating its flaws.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dudley
post
Post #29


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 50
Joined:
Member No.: 320



I almost died laughing when I read about Conservapedia. Wikipedia is blatantly biased in favor of the right. What do these people want? Do they want corporations to be able to write their own articles on their Conservawiki? There is enough of that already on Wiki as was discussed ad nauseum in another thread.

There should be a wiki that reflects the progressive position.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jonny Cache
post
Post #30


τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined:
Member No.: 398



QUOTE(Somey @ Mon 5th March 2007, 1:27am) *

What gets me is that they started hyping the site to the media before they even came up with a logo for the top left corner. Neo-cons are supposed to be better at marketing than that, aren't they? Back in the Reagan days they would never have let themselves look as half-assed as that! (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif)


Two observations:
  • Top left corner ??? Surely not !!!
  • Half-ass? I think I see their logo now.
Jonny (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/cool.gif)

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post
Post #31


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



I would like to know WTF is going on here with my account on Conservapedia!

Blocked until 2014 for having an "inappropriate or vulgar name"? Seriously? For "Thekohser"?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GlassBeadGame
post
Post #32


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined:
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981



QUOTE(thekohser @ Tue 2nd June 2009, 11:33am) *

I would like to know WTF is going on here with my account on Conservapedia!

Blocked until 2014 for having an "inappropriate or vulgar name"? Seriously? For "Thekohser"?


Well t least they have "editorial standards." Insular to the point of being indecipherable, but all the same standards I suppose.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sceptre
post
Post #33


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 318
Joined:
Member No.: 209



QUOTE(thekohser @ Tue 2nd June 2009, 6:33pm) *

I would like to know WTF is going on here with my account on Conservapedia!

Blocked until 2014 for having an "inappropriate or vulgar name"? Seriously? For "Thekohser"?


Or maybe you're too libruhl. And by that, I mean you have an ounce of sense: there are respectable people with every politcal ideology, but Conservapedia doesn't seem to be hitting that demographic at all.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Nerd
post
Post #34


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 672
Joined:
From: Cloud cuckoo land
Member No.: 11,945



Why would anyone want an account on Conservapedia anyway? It's more of a joke than Wikipedia is.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alison
post
Post #35


Skinny Cow!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,514
Joined:
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 1,806



QUOTE(Nerd @ Tue 2nd June 2009, 10:59am) *

Why would anyone want an account on Conservapedia anyway? It's more of a joke than Wikipedia is.

I think you just answered your own question there (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post
Post #36


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Nerd @ Tue 2nd June 2009, 1:59pm) *

Why would anyone want an account on Conservapedia anyway? It's more of a joke than Wikipedia is.


I wanted to "intervene" with a copy of the Wikipedia Art article, so that the conservative community's response to it could be observed.

Greg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Emperor
post
Post #37


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,871
Joined:
Member No.: 2,042



Parts of their WWII article are quite good, particularly the Far Easter Theater section. Much more informative than Wikipedia's article.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post
Post #38


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066



QUOTE(thekohser @ Tue 2nd June 2009, 11:39am) *
I wanted to "intervene" with a copy of the Wikipedia Art article, so that the conservative community's response to it could be observed.

Free advice: don't try it.

Did you really expect to receive equable treatment from Phyllis Schlafly's lunatic son??
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Viridae
post
Post #39


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,319
Joined:
Member No.: 1,498



This thing is hilarious! http://www.conservapedia.com/Wikipedia
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Viridae
post
Post #40


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,319
Joined:
Member No.: 1,498



Lol Godwin: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)