| |
|
  |
Can Jayjg be stopped?, Middle-aged management guy, or wacky teenager? |
|
|
| Jonny Cache |
Wed 28th March 2007, 4:38pm
|

τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
        
Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Somey @ Wed 28th March 2007, 12:30pm)  Right — the ArbCom is more like the Belaboured Party ... Anyway, it looks like Jayjg isn't really doing much that's interesting at the moment, at least since they locked down the "New Antisemitism" article for the what, 54th time? It seems to me they could end all the warring over that article with a simple page move. Instead of "New antisemitism", they should just call it "Allegations by high-ranking Wikipedians of liberal complicity in antisemitic activities", and then everyone could agree, right? As long as the phrase "by high-ranking Wikipedians" was in there, they wouldn't even need the word "Unfounded" at the beginning of the title. But that would violate WP:Avoid Source Responsibility. Besides, they already have Pallywood, Universities and Antisemitism, and, last alphabetically but far from least, Zombietime, an article created by the Single Purpose Account Manager of all time, Zombiefan ... Jonny This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Wed 28th March 2007, 5:21pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FNORD23 |
Sat 31st March 2007, 8:03am
|

Member
  
Group: Contributors
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun 5th Nov 2006, 5:18am
Member No.: 520
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Jonny Cache @ Wed 28th March 2007, 9:38am)  QUOTE(Somey @ Wed 28th March 2007, 12:30pm)  Right — the ArbCom is more like the Belaboured Party ... Anyway, it looks like Jayjg isn't really doing much that's interesting at the moment, at least since they locked down the "New Antisemitism" article for the what, 54th time? It seems to me they could end all the warring over that article with a simple page move. Instead of "New antisemitism", they should just call it "Allegations by high-ranking Wikipedians of liberal complicity in antisemitic activities", and then everyone could agree, right? As long as the phrase "by high-ranking Wikipedians" was in there, they wouldn't even need the word "Unfounded" at the beginning of the title. But that would violate WP:Avoid Source Responsibility. Besides, they already have Pallywood, Universities and Antisemitism, and, last alphabetically but far from least, Zombietime, an article created by the Single Purpose Account Manager of all time, Zombiefan ... Jonny  Well - at least I got a chance to tangle with Slim Virgin and JayJG and expose their blatant attempts to use OR and completely disregard WP - before I got banned for a year ! FaAfA
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FNORD23 |
Sat 31st March 2007, 5:17pm
|

Member
  
Group: Contributors
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun 5th Nov 2006, 5:18am
Member No.: 520
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Somey @ Sat 31st March 2007, 8:38am)  QUOTE(FNORD23 @ Sat 31st March 2007, 2:03am)  Well - at least I got a chance to tangle with Slim Virgin and JayJG and expose their blatant attempts to use OR and completely disregard WP - before I got banned for a year ! That was you? I was going to start a new thread on that, but we've been so busy around here lately with all the other examples of WP-related badness... In fact, we're really sort of back-logged at this point! Maybe you'd rather I didn't start one, though? There's a risk they might just extend the ban for 29 more years. Doesn't bother me if you do. I was the one following WP - SV and JG weren't. I almost couldn't believe it when SV suggested that somone contact the university to see if they used Zombie's photo, so her OR would be even more 'original' ! I tell 'ya. That really shocked me. To see an admin like SV and her cohort JG completely disregard rock-solid WP so they could keep a superfulous trvial reference was mindboggling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| anon1234 |
Sun 1st April 2007, 10:02pm
|

Senior Member
   
Group: Inactive
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat 8th Apr 2006, 2:40am
Member No.: 111

|
I've been thinking about Jayjg's claim to be in his mid-40s and in management. I doesn't seem to fit with the evidence we've collected on this guy, particularly the points below: - Jayjg is known to edit primarily from home (which is somewhere near Toronto, Canada the evidence indicates.) While some professionals can work from home, it is incredibly hard to engage in "management" from home.
- Jayjg is often childish in his edit warring. He seems much more immature than a 40 year old, let alone someone chosen for management (which requires well developed interpersonal skills.)
- Jayjg has a lot of free time on his hands (as indicated by his position on ArbCom, his frequent CheckUser work, his oversight work and his frequent admin policing work), which means he doesn't have a family to take care of (no need to take the kids to soccer games or other such things) and that his "job" is not very demanding.
We have already established that some of Jayjg's claims have been false, particularly his claim that he is based in NYC, he is clearly not based in NYC but rather Ontario, Canada as evidenced from multiple IP sightings. I think it is time to start to question Jayjg's other claims... The fact that Jayjg edits from home, that he displays a lot of immaturity in his "conflict resolution style" (if you want to call it that) and his "job" doesn't seem very demanding suggests to me that Jayjg doesn't have a real job nor is he in his 40's, this is just a set of convenient misrepresentations. Jayjg is probably more similar to Essjay, he's probably quite young and a student (or drop-out like Essay) who edits in his ample free time. In the wake of the Essjay scandal, I ask the foundation and Jayjg to publicly confirm that he is in fact over the age of 40 and that he works in NYC and to also explain away the significant and growing evidence to the contrary. It may be that Jayjg has lied to the foundation as well about who he is, this lie being just another component in Jayjg's online fantasy role playing game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Somey |
Mon 2nd April 2007, 7:18pm
|

Can't actually moderate
        
Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275

|
QUOTE(anon1234 @ Mon 2nd April 2007, 1:35pm)  Why clue what's up between Henrygb, Jayjg and the rest of the ArbCom? Lots of intrigue... Yikes! It looks like User:Henrygb did the unthinkable - he actually went through and analyzed, bit by bit, the ways in which SlimVirgin changed the RS, V, and NOR policies when "synthesizing" them into WP:ATT. And he wasn't impressed!He then had the temerity to question Slimmy's rewording of WP:RS, and even went to the extent of adding a question to the Attribution policy poll. So when that was removed, he got fed up with it and left an exasperated-sounding "I give up" message. So now, they're presumably going to accuse him of using a sock puppet or two in order to ban him, just in case he was thinking about changing his mind and returning to the discussion - or decides to post some sort of userspace essay about the situation that might cast aspersions on Slimmy's & Jayjg's motives. The last thing they want is to have someone around who's actually been paying attention to what they've been up to! I wonder who they're going to accuse him of being...? I mean, he's only been a WP user for 4 years, which isn't anywhere near enough time to warrant his being given more respect or courtesy than someone who's been there a whole nine weeks like User:DennyColt. Ol' Denny has essentially taken over the whole thing at this point, looks like! Pretty soon, they'll have to rename it "Dennypedia."
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Jonny Cache |
Mon 2nd April 2007, 8:36pm
|

τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
        
Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
I think it's pretty clear that most of them already know who DennyColt really is. And since when did lying about your identity, or anything else, remove a WikiPimp from good standing with Wikipedia? Like the Spartans — no, the original Spartans — they encourage lying, cheating, and stealing as essential skills of the expert combatant, and regard the purpose of punishment solely as a lesson on the evils of getting caught. Jonny This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Tue 3rd April 2007, 1:25pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
| gomi |
Tue 3rd April 2007, 6:11am
|
Member
       
Group: Members
Posts: 3,022
Joined: Fri 17th Nov 2006, 6:38pm
Member No.: 565

|
QUOTE(anon1234 @ Mon 2nd April 2007, 11:35am)  Any clue what's up between Henrygb, Jayjg and the rest of the ArbCom?
Henrygb is officially toast: he's been banned and told to ceremonially commit seppuku. He dared to oppose Slim and Jayjg, an offense for which he was investigated. Once you are investigated, they will find something, just like the Stasi in Eastern Germany. One suspects that User:ChrisO is next, despite the hasty deletion of this comment.As Jayjg is literally reading the ArbCom's mail, it is hard to know how anyone will get the upper hand on him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| taiwopanfob |
Tue 3rd April 2007, 12:40pm
|
Über Member
    
Group: Regulars
Posts: 643
Joined: Fri 26th May 2006, 12:21pm
Member No.: 214

|
QUOTE(gomi @ Tue 3rd April 2007, 6:11am)  Henrygb is officially toast Reading the lead-up to this, I get the impression Henrygb was forcing them to do it. If so, he may well be as amazed they didn't wait for the ATT poll stuff to blow over before the inevitable retaliation. Heck, all his shit-raising may have had no effect anyways! But the act is quite incredible nonetheless. The mindset that can claim it has "nothing to do with ATT" is about as sensible as an argument that the World Trade Center wasn't knocked flat to the ground by terrorists, but some sort of really bad building fire. A kind of officially mandated stupidity one expects of huge, monolithic, bureaucracies in government, not some kind of shoe-string database project. Also note that SlimVirgin wanted to talk to Audiovideo (see AV's talk-page) a day before. Is it known she in on the ArbCom loop as well? The poor woman is now reduced to damage control, pounding as hard as she can trying to further drive a Wedge of Idiocy between cause and effect. A more sympathetic viewpoint is that she may be pretty pissed though, acting as the cleaning lady for the ArbCom. Unpaid at that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
| everyking |
Tue 3rd April 2007, 3:10pm
|
Postmaster
      
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81

|
QUOTE(gomi @ Tue 3rd April 2007, 7:11am)  QUOTE(anon1234 @ Mon 2nd April 2007, 11:35am)  Any clue what's up between Henrygb, Jayjg and the rest of the ArbCom?
Henrygb is officially toast: he's been banned and told to ceremonially commit seppuku. He dared to oppose Slim and Jayjg, an offense for which he was investigated. Once you are investigated, they will find something, just like the Stasi in Eastern Germany. One suspects that User:ChrisO is next, despite the hasty deletion of this comment.As Jayjg is literally reading the ArbCom's mail, it is hard to know how anyone will get the upper hand on him. Leaving aside the question of whether the sockpuppet accusation is accurate, he hasn't been banned. He was merely asked to resign adminship. That's a lot more cordial than the way they removed my adminship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| anon1234 |
Tue 3rd April 2007, 6:02pm
|

Senior Member
   
Group: Inactive
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat 8th Apr 2006, 2:40am
Member No.: 111

|
QUOTE 1. It looks like Slim knew what was going on before anything was publicly posted. Does this mean Jayjg shared Checkuser info with her? Jayjg and SlimVirgin often operate together, piss one off and you have to deal with the other. QUOTE 2. How was this sockpuppetry uncovered? Was Jayjg arbitrarily going through the list of opposition voters at ATT to try to diminish the count? Did he do the same to "yes" voters? It is standard practice to find all the ways in which you can undermine those opposing you. Notice that no one is questioning the very suspicious User:DennyColt account (whom we suspect istemporarily believed might have been User:Terryeo) because he is onside with Jayjg and SlimVirgin on the big WP:ATT clusterf**k. QUOTE 3. Does Jayjg still enjoy the confidence of the community to the degree that he can be a virtual ex-officio on the ArbComm? Jayjg has been lying about his identity for years, but they won't investigate this because well... when it comes to professionalism and accuracy Wikipedia is a joke! And I for one prefer it to remain this way, which is why I contribute to investigations on WR where the findings by definition have to be denied whether true or not. Exposing problems on WR ensures that the problems remain and continue to fester on Wikipedia proper. Long live Citizendium!
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Uly |
Tue 3rd April 2007, 6:56pm
|
Junior Member
 
Group: Contributors
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed 7th Jun 2006, 8:01pm
Member No.: 250

|
QUOTE(anon1234 @ Tue 3rd April 2007, 6:02pm)  User:DennyColt account (whom we suspect is User:Terryeo) What supports that? Terryeo is one of those single purpose guys with an extremely one track mind. I find it very hard to believe he could spend all the time DennyColt does on random vandal fighting and policy wonking without finding a scientology-related fight to pick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| anon1234 |
Tue 3rd April 2007, 7:05pm
|

Senior Member
   
Group: Inactive
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat 8th Apr 2006, 2:40am
Member No.: 111

|
QUOTE(Uly @ Tue 3rd April 2007, 6:56pm)  QUOTE(anon1234 @ Tue 3rd April 2007, 6:02pm)  User:DennyColt account (whom we suspect is User:Terryeo) What supports that? Terryeo is one of those single purpose guys with an extremely one track mind. I find it very hard to believe he could spend all the time DennyColt does on random vandal fighting and policy wonking without finding a scientology-related fight to pick. Somey has long thought DennyColt is a sockpuppet of somebody. We put some evidence together recently that seemed to suggest that it may in fact be Terryeo, see this thread. I didn't think so at first, but then I started to notice that Terryeo had a great existing interest in ATT, RS, NOR and V as well as a lot of submissiveness towards SlimVirgin. Thus DennyColt's policy interests do have a clear precedent in Terryeo. There isn't any conclusive proof at this point though except for the similar spelling mistakes and similar interests and a few other relatively innocuous similarities. Further research is warranted. Was Terryeo ever subject to a checkuser? The individual who did that historical checkuser should still have the IP information and could compare it with the latest results from DennyColt's recent checkuser.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Somey |
Tue 3rd April 2007, 7:16pm
|

Can't actually moderate
        
Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275

|
QUOTE(anon1234 @ Tue 3rd April 2007, 2:05pm)  Further research is warranted. Further research actually suggests it's not him, I'm afraid... I'm probably going to have to move some of that stuff out of the public subforums. Over the last few weeks, User:AntaeusFeldspar and User:ChrisO have spotted Terryeo using an AnonIP to edit some Scientology stuff, specifically this one, and since it's pretty clearly him and that isn't consistent with the gunning-for-adminship behavior we're seeing from DennyColt, I'd have to say Denny's probably not Terryeo. (There's just too many of 'em, dammit!) Meanwhile, getting back to the original topic of this particular thread, this AN/I entry about Jayjg will probably get ChrisO booted out eventually, along with User:Timeshifter, another Wikipedian who's into Middle-East Affairs and (it would seem) largely opposed to the SlimVirgin folks...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |