The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

 
Closed TopicStart new topic
> Jimbo Wales Calls WikiTruth.info a "Hoax"
Rating  1
ownage
post Tue 18th April 2006, 2:33am
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 196
Joined: Sun 12th Mar 2006, 7:21pm
From: Snorlax Paradise
Member No.: 65



http://www.itnews.com.au/newsstory.aspx?CIaNID=31674
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lir
post Tue 18th April 2006, 4:47am
Post #2


Communist
*****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 978
Joined: Sun 26th Feb 2006, 10:27pm
Member No.: 4



Its obviously not a "hoax"; even if the people are lying about being administrators, that doesn't make it a "hoax". All you have to do is read the article on Jimbo Wales and you can see why Jimbo doesn't like it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Blu Aardvark
post Tue 18th April 2006, 4:57am
Post #3


Gone
*****

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun 26th Feb 2006, 10:46pm
Member No.: 2

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



At least one user contributing there is an adminstrator, I can verify that much. "They're just a bunch of banned trolls" is getting to be a popular defense to legitimate criticism, however.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
blissyu2
post Tue 18th April 2006, 7:24am
Post #4


the wookie
*********

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 4,596
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 12:14am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



I think what Jimbo means is "As soon as we find out who they are, we are going to ban them, and label them forevermore as trolls".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sapp
post Tue 18th April 2006, 7:39am
Post #5


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue 11th Apr 2006, 5:05pm
Member No.: 117



Jimbo wrote "There's no evidence at all that there are any Wikipedia administrators associated with it."

I think that is the most public outright lie that Jimbo has ever been caught saying.

There is *considerable* evidence that administrators are associated with it. How the hell else are they rescuing the wikitext of deleting articles.

Hopefully some good will come from this. There are plenty of blind followers of Jimbo these days. But he makes mistakes and sometimes lies. Perhaps some people will wake up and think for themselves.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
blissyu2
post Tue 18th April 2006, 9:48am
Post #6


the wookie
*********

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 4,596
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 12:14am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Yes. Had Jimbo said something along the lines of, "These rouge admins will pay - what they are doing is against the very idea of Wikipedia, and is destroying it" then some people might have respected him for it, and supported it. But what he did was to lie about it. He said that it was a hoax. And because he said that so publicly, I doubt he will ever live it down.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 5 13, 7:28pm